Is this shit any good? I have an upcoming history exam thats

cmon you fags

>>3274182
Threads about literature belong on /lit/.
And now I sage your post so devilishly

>>3274239
HISTORY you retard

figured people who care about history would also read books about history

>>3274182
You won't learn anything exam-wise from this book. It's a good read, but it certainly doesn't cover most standard curriculum themes and facts.

>>3274182
White supremacist propaganda

>>3274182
Back to >>/pol/

>>3274252

You want to discuss the history of your book? Too bad, 25 year rule, enjoy your ban.

>>3274182
>upcoming history exam
>Is this shit any good?
Good God, didn't they tell you what book you need for the exam? Email your professor.
>but its in norway, so its probably gonna be euro-centric, particularly concerning scandinavia
And just how is this relevant to the discussion? Every history book will focus on what's relevant to the geographic location.

>>3274182
Yeah it's super good

I used it all through University as a starting point. His writing is easy to read but quite dense. Lots of little details in there that might be missed by other accounts.

He's also massively anti-communist, although he has a ridiculous boner for the Poles (he married one)

Enjoy