So who has the stronger claim?

File: IMG_0006.gif (45KB, 480x319px)

45KB, 480x319px

Neither. That's Roman land

>>3271632

why would mizrahi have a stronger claim then sephardi or ashkenazi?

>>3272041
Mizrahi are Yemeni traders who converted in like 600-800 AD????.
There's supposedly evidence of a few semi permanent settlements in the area but it's too hard to tell. Even if they speak Hebrew they still build like Bedouins and Arabs

>>3271632
Jews

>>3271632
Palestine was already there, Britain and France carved out Israel because they felt bad for what Hitler did. Now we've been fighting everyone who is pissed off about this still since 1946, leading to a partial reason for us being labeled the baddies in the ME.

Gaza and west bank should belong to palestinians, the rest stays with the jews. Shame neither side is willing to do anything to break the status quo.

>>3272084

so wouldnt sephardi have stronger claim since israel is mediterranean? yemen is further from israel then spain, italy and greece isn't it?

>>3272041
>>3272084
Mizrahi Jews include Jews from places like Lebanon, Syria, Egypt, Libya...

And they're also a part of the sephardim.

>>3272041

Mizrahi aren't as mixed with Europeans.

>>3272130
I think the best solution is to abandon the two states entirely and have a multi-enthinc selucar nation. as long as there's two states there's going to be terretorial disputes.