In the bottom left, who would dress like that in 1963? Time travel exists
Old NYC looks so fuckin comfy
>>3271082
The guy in jeans?
>>3271082
>who would dress like that in 1963?
I dunno, literally fucking everyone?
>omg a guy in JEANS with a SATCHEL and wearing a HOODIE in the 1960's, it looks vaguely like what people wear NOW
>TIME TRAVEL LOL
>>3271082
time travel backwards is impossible idiot. Is not like there's a giant VCR recording everything and you just rewind to a certain point.
What happened already has passed and it cannot be viewed or experienced again.
also, go back to /x/ you filthy scumbag
>>3271082
>kid to his left is wearing the same thing
wow impressive work OP
>>3273434
Wrong, Time is just a dimension, like a big block. Time is an illusion. You're just looking at one frame at a time, but it's all there
If you wait long enough, you will "go back" to the "past".
Jeans have been around since the 19th century, do some research before making stupid threads idiot.
>>3274860
>time
>dimension
Pick one
Thats a hat doofus
>>3271082
your mother
>>3271082
Photoshop
>>3275361
Not that moronic faggot but time is literally a dimension. Your problem is that you don't know what "dimension" means. Also, you're a retard.
>>3275503
So this is the high level of discourse that /his/ is famous for huh?
Woah.
>>3273434
>he thinks his relative present is the objective present for all of space-time
Copernican principle, brainlet. Everyone in every time gets the impression their present is the real present. This is as bad a mistake as thinking Earth is the center of the universe on the basis of everything appearing to revolve around it the same way everything appears to revolve around any planet you use as a vantage point.
>>3271082
Why was life so much better before ?
You know jeans existed in the 60s, anon?