Was he a bad general overall?

>>3259104

There is no such thing as a "good" general. A general is a man who has whored himself over the state in exchange for the privilege of compelling other men to murder each other in service of the state.

>>3259112
Damn... Stay woke, brother!

>>3259112
p-p-p-p-p-p-profound thoughts anon

>>3259104
No. He didn't do a bad job at all. The encirclement at Stalingrad happened because of issues way higher than his ability to decide .

>>3260280
t. retard

>>3259104

No, he was just too beta to follow his own judgement instead of Hitler's until it was too late. He did a good job taking the city, he just wasn't allowed to break out of the city for a withdrawal when he asked to.