Why did Spaniards have to destroy all this?

Because their sacrificing houses smelled worse than the slaughterhouses of castille.
Inside those temples boys were tortured, raped, ripped open, and their flesh consumed by pedophiles.
Were you a humble christian and you would do the same.
"Witches" were a joke compared to these sodomite jungleniggers.

>>3241740
Because its so shinny

File: 1497067776065.png (2MB, 822x1274px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 822x1274px

>>3241740
The Spanish did not destroy anything, they only created and brought civilization to the unenlightened and backwards peoples of the new world.

>euro apes literally wiped out an entire continent's worth of people by being unhygenic disease carriers
>for some reason brown people are seen as the dirty ones

really makes you think

>>3241740
>When you attack Indian empires for gold and it causes inflation so big your "Empire" becomes irrelevant.

>>3241793
Well after 300 years of being relevant i think it's a good deal

>>3241771
Why do you do this

>>3241771

You aren't deceiving anyone, stop spamming your ugly face, moor

>>3241771
This.

File: aztec_conquistador.jpg (251KB, 1200x1200px) Image search: [Google]

251KB, 1200x1200px

>>3241740
>ywn stand on top of Tenochtitlan's Great Pyramid and receive the submission of the multitudes
>ywn win eternal glory for God and country, scoring a decisive victory against the heathen and ensuring your name will live forever in the annals of history for ten thousand years

File: 1500164055033.png (853KB, 617x617px) Image search: [Google]

853KB, 617x617px

>spaniards have a whole continent filled with vast resources to exploit
>they still went and took land in asia anyway

>>3241850
>tfw we are revealing the facts of such "epic" adventure thanks to archeological findings
Good enough to me to be honest

>Why did white people have to destroy Anime and White girls dressed like Incas?

File: 3679744578997533.jpg (17KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 250x250px

>tfw Eurofags are so holier-than-thou that they can unleash a host of treachery and depravity and try to justify it by "Well, they bullied each other too, soo..."
>tfw this actually a convincing argument to them

File: 1490330231301.jpg (23KB, 447x400px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 447x400px

>>3241886
The real argument is that the Inca could have stopped it if they were stronger. In the end that's all that really matters.
Why did they do it? They were capable of doing so, and the Inca were incapable of doing anything against them.

Is that the answer you want? The Spaniards were no more savage than the Inca, they were just better equipped

>>3241740
am calling white washing on those cosplayers

>>3241896
Incas were a group of less than 90000 people rulling over 15 millions, before the spanish came.

The diseases killed at least 60% of the population and the ultra-dependant administrative system got ruined. Some recently conquered cultures and big enemies started attacking the Inca. All of this happened after Huayna Inca Capac died due to an european disease leavung no official sucessor and not-completing his plans; then the civil war started and several sides and interests appeared, and all of this happened when the war and hostility situation was happening at the time.

Spanish didn't fight the Incas till the last years. All battles were fought by natives.

File: 1500950133234.jpg (43KB, 600x401px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 600x401px

>>3241930
Guess what, Europe got decimated by foreign disease too, it was called the Plague. Shit happens.
You can whine about how unfair it is, but that doesn't matter in the end. Circumstance favored Spain.

>>3241943
>might makes right
>posts anime
Fuck off weeb

>>3241943
Those diseases are small fry compared to what natives dealt with.

File: 1497025413571.jpg (319KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

319KB, 1920x1080px

>>3241951
Right doesn't fucking matter, you dipshit. Right has never come into conquest. Nobody agreed that France was just going to be France; France had to defend itself from England to be France. It doesn't matter if they were sick or not.
Humanities faggots arguing about the morality of shit that happened 500 years ago in order to present a modern day victim narrative are the worst. There were no Noble Savages; no Beautiful, irreplaceable cultures.

Might may not make right, but it does make Nations. It's the only thing that does

>>3241886

>ripping people's hearts out then dancing around in their flayed skins, is bullying

>>3241958
It doesn't matter, it doesn't matter if their society got razed to the ground by Martians before Spain came. None of it changes the fact that they didn't stop the conquests, because they were incapable. You're not going to get a participation trophy, because you didn't feel good.

>>3241943
>eurangutans
>1/3 deaths
>invaded by nomads

>Inca divine blood
>60-80% of deaths for several years
>administrative system destroyed
>bigger population enemies still fucking around near your empire
>rebels all over your empire
>civil war destroying thr imperial army and diving them by sucesor interests
>lucky miracle happens as the spaniards met the civil war winner Inca when he was returning to the capital
>yet spaniards couldn't do shit till they brought their army from Spain
>invaded by "colonizers" who destroyed all culture, art and structures that were on all cities
Hmm...

>>3241885
>>3241905
Kek two of them are Asian.

>>3241981
The mighty spanish army of 200 soldiers

File: 1502062106880.jpg (59KB, 806x640px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 806x640px

>>3241984
I honestly thought two of them were digital paintings
>>3241981
What point are you trying to make? That if the Inca had a redo they'd win?
If you think the Inca were super rad and totally could have beat the Spaniards 1v1 with tourni rules, fine. Doesn't change the fact that they lost

>>3241981
The Byzantine Empire got fucked by a plague that ultimately stopped it from reclaiming Roman imperial lands. Suffered through multiple civil wars, succession conflicts, multi-front wars, the rise of their neighboring countries into great powers. They still ended up lasting all the way to 1453, almost 800 years later.
Byzantine culture barely exists now in the land it once ruled and is mainly read about in books.

People playing victim cards for nations and empires from history when they killed one another before the Euros came sounds so weak.

You should be happy the Chinese didn't find a way to the Americas. They'd have wiped everyone out and would have zero Chinese guilt afterwards.

>>3241966
It's not morality. It's literally comparing Leonardo Da Vinci with a maimed body with a mediocre person with a gun.

Literally the same as comparing mycenaean culture to dorian savages that just happened to use iron.

>>3241740
Why do I feel like those costumes really didn't exist for women back during that time period?

>>3242002
Probably because those bikinis look like modern bikinis?

>>3241996
Also, the Turks only took Constantinople because Germany sold them a Cannon Byzantium was too poor to buy. Had Enrico Dandolo not ruined Byzantium, they could still be here today.
See, none of that ultimately matters. The only reason anything happens is because the circumstances surrounding them, random or consequential, allow them too.
If the fall of the Inca makes you sad, go write a poem or something.

Anything to end this retarded dickmeasuring contest

>>3241998
Leonardo da Vinci was a faggot and a procrastinator. The man whom Leonardo wanted to be already existed, and his name was Filippo Brunelleschi

>>3241996
Except that natives beat the Inca. The administrative and absolutist system was weak at the moment. Incas were less than 1/100 of the population of their empire.

Spaniards didn't fight the Inca till they got their army to SA. The recent archrological remains demonstrates that all corpses had native weapon wounds.

Even most of the reported spanish battles that they supposedly fought against cavalry were actually fought by natives against Incas.

>wiped
Wrong. Natives beat the Inca.

>>3241740
we wuz kangs

>>3242028
They were though.

>>3242020
What the fuck are you talking about? You're telling me the people who beat the Byzantines to shreds for a period of 1000 years weren't native to the region they lived in?

What kind of logic are you using? We're telling you that using a shitty defense like that means nothing. This isn't some kind of pride contest. Complaining about your country being wiped out by natives means diddly squat.

Carthage no longer exists. Mycenae no longer exists. Khwarezm no longer exists. Poland at one point in time stopped existing. A shitload of Chinese states and their ethnic tribes got wiped off the face of the planet several times in their history. What the fuck is even your point?

>>3241930
>rule over a large empire with a small population
>expect the large empire to not revolt sooner or later

>>3241740
Those breasts look quite exquisite. Is that a movie scene for a porn or something?

>>3242045
>revolt was controlled preventively all the time through a strong proto-socialist system of administration and spreading a commom sense of identity with the division of tribes and migration

>the death of the 60-80% won't affect the system

>>3242047
Most likely some cosplay, if it is porn then I demand source

>>3242039
>incapable of doing so
This point.

The fall of the Inca empire has two events purely based on luck, that decided main future circumstances.

The Inca was dividing the empire by two parts north-south. Before finishing his plans of the conquest of north SA, he dies leaving no official sucesor due to european diseases.

The civil war winner was returning to the capital to put some order to the nobles and finishing the tribes threat, just then the spanish met him when they were looking for Cusco, then they kidnapped him.

>>3241793
Inflation didn't make the Spanish empire irrelevant though

>>3242077
It doesn't matter why you can't do something. If you can't run the marathon because you accidentally broke your leg, you still can't run the marathon.
The reason why they can't doesn't matter.

>>3241766
>"Witches" were a joke compared to these sodomite jungleniggers.
This. That speak of the human sacrifices that the European pagans did, and yet they were nothing compared to what those disgusting beings did.
>Let's boil babies and eat them for the glory of Taloc. If they cry, we're going to have a good year of rain.

>>3242090
If you are fine claiming that a gorilla is superior to a human without weapons, I can agree with you.

File: 1490895521322.png (144KB, 305x315px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 305x315px

>>3242100
Can you imagine being this butthurt?

>>3242107
So you don't agree? Also stop using toon pictures. This is not your pedophile board.

File: 1502232471081.jpg (25KB, 572x720px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 572x720px

>>3242113
Anime belongs on all boards. Also, yes I don't agree to your overly reductive analogy. You're just a super butthurt anti-Europe retard, and your kind has no place in history.
History is about what happened, not if what happened was right.

>>3242146
>only matters the outcome
>overly reductive
Hehehe

So you disagree with yourself. Let me "redpill" you with this fact.

Incas were superior to europeans. History demonstrates it. Deal with it, pedophile monkey.

>>3242159
Yes, it only matters the outcome, and yes your analogy was reductive. The Europeans and the Inca were both advanced human cultures.

The notion that one is superior to the other is laughable, especially when the better one loses. If Euros are so shit, then the entire world lost to a bunch of losers. Maybe you're playing the wrong game.

>>3241930
where on earth did you get that 15 million estimate from, that's utter horseshit.

>>3241793
>your "Empire" becomes irrelevant
yeah after a few centuries LOL

>>3241886
the real argument is might makes right

>>3242170
>advanced human cultures
Europeans had 40000+ years of settlement on europe. Amerindians had 15000 years.

Yet amerindians reached the bronze age in less time than eurangutans.

>better one loses
That's why I compared a gorilla with an unarmed human. Who is superior between the human and the gorilla?

>Bunch of losers
The facts are there. Incas developed more technology than eurangutans in less time and amerindians even had some better technology than middle-ages eurangutanland.

If we compare amerindians with an european Chronological system of reference, amerindians reached the bronze age in 25000BC and europeans met them in 23500BC.

History demonstrates Inca superiority. Get over it, chimpo.

>>3241854
They even had a plan to take over Japan. While fighting in the med with the barbary pirates, the other European nations and starting the conquest of the Maya cities and still getting a grip of the philipines.

>>3242113
>complaining about Chinese cartoons on his Burmese basket weaving forum

File: Screenshot_2017-08-14-13-12-48.png (61KB, 480x800px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 480x800px

>>3242172
Several years after the diseases entered the continent and were wiping out the natives.

>>3242187
>Europeans had 40000+ years of settlement on europe


90% of the Europeans lives in Europe since 3000 AD (Corded Ware and Bell Beakers)

>>3242200
Literally all conquered and copied the greek-roman culture, skipping most of human progress, yet still more time spent developing compared to amerindians.

The most ancient culture that could influence south-amerindiana were just some decades earlier before the rest.

Incas were superior to europeans. History demonstrates it. Aaand here it comes the chimp-out...

>>3242208
The same did the incas with the moche and moche descendents or the Aztecs with the Toltecs.

>>3242212
*Nazca.

>>3242208
>Literally all conquered and copied the greek-roman culture

Dumbest post ever

Celts were famed for their iron smithing, and Vikings for their steel smithing

The very breastplates and swords of the Greeks and Roman are in fact Celtic btw

>>3242208
So you're saying that even if I've never played football, before I am better than a professional footbal player as long as I'm better than they were when they first started playing?

>>3242218
He is also ignoring all the bronze age cultures before the collapse and after it, but he is trying to troll after all. At least is better than another african thread.

File: Capture.png (240KB, 1718x781px) Image search: [Google]

240KB, 1718x781px

>>3242218
>smithing
i mean blacksmithing

>>3242212
>moche descendants
Moche didn't trade with the aztecs nor the mayas. They traded with with west mexican culturea and gave them metal-working.
Also the differenc of occupation between those two ethnic groups is less than 500 years.
>>3242218
So you tried to point out the knowledge they got from anatolain and middle-eastesners that settled before 40000BC?
>>3242223
Bronze age europe? When did it happen?
>>3242220
Nope. I'm comparing a gorilla with an unarmed human.

>>3242239
The Bronze Age societies of Europe, like 5200 year old agean one,when the trade networks from Skandinavia to Egypt started a f ew years later or the first true Euro cities of the balkans/central Europe before the bronze proper (using copper tools etc).

File: Incatard.jpg (248KB, 1200x1600px) Image search: [Google]

248KB, 1200x1600px

>People still feed the Incatard

>>3242266
Moor detected.

>>3242270
Say the mestizo withe inferiority complex.

They did it because they could, and because they wanted to. It was a necessary evil that provided Latin America with a higher standard of civilization.

>>3242275
>projecting
Here we are stating facts. Why is the moor so buttblasted about a single fact?

>>3242285
Its moops you idiot

>>3242259
What are the remains of the helladic bronze age phase?

>>3241771
>t. pablo doritos del la tacos, killer of babies and gold slut.

File: dendra armour.jpg (4MB, 2592x3888px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 2592x3888px

>>3242295
>helladic bronze age phase
In Greece and the agean? There are diggin sites everywhere.

>>3242352
Shieet. Why did they stop using that?

How was the copper extraction? Was it imposed by the state, or did the artisans managed to get it through trade.

>>3242387
Trade. They stopped using it, because they learnt Iron during the Dark Age

>>3242388
Hmm... Did they get influenced mainly by egyptians or is there another culture that gave them such armour ideas?

Also, are there hints of what exactly happened on the dark ages? I heard that the population abandoned the old hierarchy systems and cities and adopted another one. How did that happen?

File: Bronze Age dudes577753_554055177962407_1239514005_n.jpg (276KB, 960x869px) Image search: [Google]

276KB, 960x869px

>>3242387
Trade, and the real problem was Tin, very hard to find, only a few places like Wales had it, so an Atlantic-Med trade web was formed. You can find Egyptians bronze swords in Skandinavia sites for example (and even loltastic flint swords imitating them) but something happened than not even historian agree and all those societies collapsed, specially the med ones like the hitties than rivaled Egypt ,got rekt hard.
Some larpers with bronze armors, at those times they had some wild desings.

File: Bronze Age blades P1020231.jpg (212KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

212KB, 1600x1200px

>>3242400
Egypt was big, but there were a lot of other civilizations, so it's hard to pin down the influences, and after the collapse of the URSS a lot of archeological sites opened and shed some light in those times (Before or after the collapse), there is plenty of literature if it interest you a determined place and time, the problem it's finding it in a language you understand.
Minoans or Miceneans, even being a stone throw of Egypt had a very diferentiate culture for example.

>>3242077
All of history boils down to luck. Better to be lucky than good.

Pizarro and 12 random dudes conquered the entire Inca empire alone. Imagine how pathetic they were irl for that to happen

>>3242239
I honestly hope you that your house catches on fire tonight while you're sleeping and you can't escape. You're so fucking annoying and uneducated and you post this shit in every thread about any pre Columbian civilization and it details and ruins the thread. Stop WE WUZing you disgusting piece of trash. I hope you die of smallpox like all the natives.

>>3241740
Better Spaniards then Arabs
Incas would have been Halal slaughtered lol

>>3242449
I think he isn't even peruvian, it's only stirring shit.

>>3242445
Wrong. Natives beat the Inca. Eurangutans just kept backstabbing each other, even their own kind hehehe

>>3242449
>100 failed attempts of goalshifting
>still cannot prove Inca superiority wrong
I'm here just to clarify a single fact. Why can't eurangutans into deduction?

>>3242460
This is my first post in this thread, I haven't tried to prove anything. I'm not even European. I just actually hate you. You derail and ruin threads that actually have potential. You're a tumor on the board. I hope that you get in a car crash, and then your seatbelt locks up with your gas tank on fire.

>>3242460
>Wrong. Natives beat the Inca
No lmao. Natives were stomped by an army composed by Pizarro and his pub buddies. Then Pizarro played the Incas against each other until they collapsed. Truly the most pathetic way to be conquered to be honest

>>3242096
you ever wondered what started it all?

>>3242475
Wrong. Literally all archeological findings demonstrate that all batlles except the last ones were between natives and several 'spanish' chroniclers that affirmed that the the spanish fought with gunpowder and horses were mostly made up. Spanish fought when their reinfocements and main aid came from Spain.

Incas were still fighting againd superior numbers all the time.

Try again, monkey.

>>3242486
The empire must not have been that great if it took two seconds for every other tribe in the empire to chimp out and betray you.

>>3242492
>60-80% deaths in a huge administrative system of official-dependent regime
>civil war decimating the imperial guard and dividing the nobles
>huge population tribes still threatening the empire
>spanish getting to the inca by luck just before he returns to the capital to solve the rebel problems
Incas were superior to europeans. History demonstrates it. Deal with it, subhuman.

>>3242486
>their reinfocements and main aid came from Spain.
200 men? Yeah Incas were a meme that got cucked to death by a bunch of pig feeders

>>3242498
>solve the rebel problems
But that wouldn't happen. If you violently put down a rebellion it only tends to make the subjugated people angrier. A good example is the Easter uprising. Or ask the Assyrians how it went for them.

File: 1484546136759.jpg (307KB, 610x872px) Image search: [Google]

307KB, 610x872px

this is what your average yuropean """Person""" looks like. Incans should have won

>>3242505
Wrong. The skirmishes only consisted on kidnapping the Inca before returning to the capital and killing unarmed civilians.
After the reorganization of the nobility with the neo Inca state the reinforcements already came alongside the settlers and the numerous tribes fought against the decimated Incas.
>>3242511
Rebellions were prevented with the loss of identity from each village and city through the migration of families and the rupture of tribe relations. The massive deaths and the lack of officials controlling the empire in war times several recently conquered cultures rebelled. Also the main threat was the Chancas and the tribes that the spanish allied with.

>>3242541
So you guys were douchebags to your neighbors and stripped them of their identities. You guys were assholes and now you bitch because they didn't want to be in your shitty empire.

>>3242544
Cultures were preserved and never imposed except they had to learn quechua and send some artisans to the capital to exchange knowledge and methods of metal-working, ceramic, architecture...etc. That's why today we know a lot from the cultures the Inca conquered, yet the spanish obliterated all remains of Inca culture, except the foundations of some structures and artifacts they ddin't find yet.

The "rebellion" problem origin is the sense of nationalism that is different against the one you want to rebel,

Incas were superior to europeans. History demonstrates it. Get over it, monkey.

>>3242565
I'm Japanese, not European. You're posting bullshit and you know it's bullshit. You're a troll that's only here to piss off white people.

>>3242581
Are you retarded or you haven't read a single thing about what you are talking about?

The loss of tribal identity to replace a 'national' one was the goal of the Incas due to the constant exchange of artisans each year. If there was a threat of rebellion or disobedience, some families had to migrate to another recently conquered tribe.
It's not a secret that the Inca structures were destroyed so the spanish could build their "buildings" that couldn't even endure the several earthquakes the zone has. Th gold from the cities and capital was all melted and sent to the metropoli. The textil art, quipus and some other ceramics were burnt because they thought it was satanic. The people were imposed to stop producing these objects, the textil symbols morphed due to the restrictions, if there was someone who could still create them.

Incas were superior to europeans. History demonstrates it. Deal with it, monkeys.

File: eternally_cucked.png (2MB, 1500x1059px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1500x1059px

>>3241740
>>3241981
>>3242020
>>3242266
>>3242275
>>3242517
>>3242565

>Just for a bunch of stupid brown bitches?*

Stay mad Incatard, natives girls are thirsty for moor's dick.

>>3242599
You aren't even a moor. Probably a sharter.

>>3242598
Whatever you say troll. It's sad that you ruin other people's threads because no one will respond to yours anymore.

>>3242619
Just stating one fact ruins a thread?

These eurangutans...

>>3242629
One again I'm Japanese. Learn to read faggot. You ruin threads by shitposting like a faggot. I want you to go to Peru, find the tallest Inca pyramid, and jump off.

>>3241984
Amerindians are kinda asian anyway both have weird eyes

>>3242028
ñuqanchik wuz inti and aca

>>3241970
>they did horrible shit to each other
>it makes it okay to do horrible shit to them in the pursuit of greedy, selfish endeavors
>This passes as morally righteous to the """christian""" eurofag
Really makes me think.

>>3242266
Ricuna mama I posted again

>>3241996
>You should be happy the Chinese didn't find a way to the Americas. They'd have wiped everyone out and would have zero Chinese guilt afterwards.
Considering how the chinese expanded in Asia it's more likely that they would've incorporated the local royalty into their vassal system and annexed deserted/less populates areas. Then probably some war would happen between them and the peoples who would resist the vassal system, getting conquered and sinicized or submitted under vassal states control. The others would probably ally with the chinks after seeing their power and remain as loyal vassals controling the lands not annexed by the chinks

>>3242599
>you will never conquer an empire just to make wives out of their cuties

File: white civilization accomplishment.jpg (44KB, 550x366px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 550x366px

>>3242218
>Celts were famed for their iron smithing, and Vikings for their steel smithing while still living literally like today's primitive african tribes while the incans had huge palaces with geometrics and architecture so complex not even today their conquerors have figured how they did it


kek at the alt-right stormfaggot

File: 1453610271823.jpg (53KB, 474x595px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 474x595px

>>3242460
>>100 failed attempts of goalshifting
>>still cannot prove Inca superiority wrong

mfw OP is creating the biggest butthurt on his's eurocentrist stormweenies

Because the Spaniards are horny 24/7 and wanted some of that native poon

>>3243325
Cortes and Pizzaro just wanted some Amerindian waifus
Same reason why the mongols invaded Persia and the Rus'

>>3242648
>buaah why did spaniards destroyed x!
>should have genocided all desu
>Incas were superior to europeans though
Choose the most cancerous option. Protip: It's not the third one. Hehe

>>3242629
I've read your whole argument and it seems like you keep showing examples of them being weaker lol through nothing but analogies and stories of them losing.

I'm just a by stander, but from my pov its like you're justifying loses

>>3243703
It's pretty simple. If there is one ethnic based civilization better than the other between eurangutans and Incas, it would be obvious it was the Incas.

Amerindians have had a higher development rate compared to eurangutans even though they reached America 15000 years after eurangutans settled on eurangutanland.

Thus, as History demonstrates, Incas were superior to europeans. Deal with it, chimpo.

File: th.jpg (9KB, 239x260px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 239x260px

>>3241740
>white and chinese chicks wearing aztec gear
>not mudshit cholo bitches that look like pic related

>>3243825
That looks disgusting. I don't know why you mongrels like that puke-inducing garbage.

>>3241850
>forever
>ten thousand years

>>3242002
Because that outfit is ripped straight from Quake 3 Arena

File: 1486879435563.png (188KB, 492x440px) Image search: [Google]

188KB, 492x440px

>>3241886
>real morality doesn't exist guys
>ritual child sacrifice is part of their CULTURE and it's just a valid as any other


fucking kill yourself mate

All these people feeding some nigger troll that defends incas when mapuches were the real deal. Never defeated nigguh.

>>3241740
sauce on the left girl? thx

>>3241740
Kill yourself please

>>3244275
Yeah, thank god that now the kids are only raped by catholic priests and american tourists

>>3244275
>literally less barbarous than eurangutan early bronze age
Hmm...

>>3244310
>literally impaled by the ass, since the inca empire their alias were the "broken ass"
Nowadays, the nickname still remains, roto.

>>3242170
I really admire inca architecture and monuments and i think it's amazing they had the logistics to manage an empire through dense jungle and high mountain ranges.

That said it's undeniable that inca civilization was much less urbanized and "developped" than mesoamerican civs.

You can't compare cuzco to farreaching hegemonic and tradecenters like teotihuacan wich as an urban center still challenges our idea of city development today or tenochtitlan wich was in itself one of the most impressive and carefully planned urban realizations in history.

The inca empire was impressive, but still suffered from its location and isolation compared tot other centers of civilization

>>3244768
It suffered yet developed at a higher technological advancement rate than europeans though.

>>3244768 was meant for -
>>3243720

>>3244364
at least they are getting paid/something in return

>>3244805
See>>3244418

>>3244809
I am sorry but my ancestors weren't barbarians

>>3244811
>Human sacrifice in germanic peoples, being resorted to in exceptional situations arising from crises of an environmental (crop failure, drought, famine) or social (war) nature, often thought to derive at least in part from the failure of the king to establish and/or maintain prosperity and peace (árs ok friðar) in the lands entrusted to him. In later Scandinavian practice, human sacrifice appears to have become more institutionalised, and was repeated as part of a larger sacrifice on a periodic basis (according to Adam of Bremen every nine years).
>Three thousand bones of young children, with evidence of sacrificial rituals, have been found in Sardinia. Pelasgians offered a sacrifice of every tenth child during difficult times. Syrians sacrificed children to Jupiter and Juno. Many remains of children have been found in Gezer excavations with signs of sacrifice. Child skeletons with the marks of sacrifice have been found also in Egypt dating 950-720 BCE. In Carthage "child sacrifice in the ancient world reached its infamous zenith." Besides the Carthaginians, other Phoenicians, and the Canaanites, Moabites and Sepharvites offered their first-born as a sacrifice to their gods.
Hmm...

>>3244821
>germanics
>sardinia
>Syrians
>Egypt
>Carthage
well looks like I am in the safe then

>>3244830
Are you an eurangutan? Shouldn't you be praying to your lake gods and sacrifice some kids before they get mad?

>>3244801
How is that in any way true, Inca and Europeans developed agriculture around the same time, the only big difference being the absence of load bearing animals wich is visible as Inca buildings and monuments are often smaller and their agriculture was less intensive than european wheat agriculture,

urban centers where smaller and a huge part of the empire wasn't centralised as was proven by pizzaro's conquest, a great part of the empire still lived in tribal conditions, meanwhile europe had enlightened despots with centralized proto- nation states.

I'm not by any means saying europeans are inherrently or genetically superior , I'm Just saying that stating that an isolated empire with heavy enviromental restraints had the same rate of development as a major player on the eurasian landmass is autistic and an insult to a historians intelligence, fuck you

>>3244856
/thread

Incatard btfo

>>3244837
#NotAllEurangutans

>>3241740
Growing up in mexico city we were told to hate Cortes, the Spaniards, and Europeans in general for ruining the glorious aztec empire.

It did not matter that the aztecs were murdering 80,000 people a year during their various religious festivals. It was of no concern that people were treated like farm animals and could be killed on the streets of Tenochtitlan as food for the elites. No matter how brutal or savage the aztecs were, it was all glossed over and we were told than the conquistadors were the truly evil ones. Because they stopped barbaric human sacrifice and ended a reign of tyranny that had lasted for 300 years.

>>3244903
See
>>3244821

>>3244907
Nobody here is defending germannic peoples the have nothing to do with this thread

>>3244856
Kinda funny how the inca autist is remarkably silent about this post

File: inca chronicles.png (208KB, 1226x1126px) Image search: [Google]

208KB, 1226x1126px

>>3244856
Simple.
Europeans settle on europe: 40000BC
Amerindians reached Canada: 25000BC; then after the deglaciation (10000 years later) populated the rest of the continent in 15000BC

European crops date from 10000BC.
Amerindian crops date from 6000BC.

Europeans getting the bronze from other culture in 3200BC.
Amerindians reached the bronze age in 500BC approximately.

Also as a great factor:
Horse domesticated in 3000BC approximately.

Knowing that the rests of all amerindian populations of 14000BC to 10000BC were pretty much paleolithical-tier and all lived as nomads, practiced some artistic manifestations as european paleo-populations. It's safe to assume they started again in the paleolithic and had to morph the environment of woods, jungles and coasts to their convenience, the same the europeans did with their environment for thousands of years before the Neolithic.

Then let's compare:
Europeans lurking around as nomads: 30000 years.
Amerindians lurking around as nomads: 9000 years.

Europeans reaching the bronze age from other cultures after the Neolithic stage: 6800 years.
Amerindians reaching the bronze age by themselves without the influence of a culture thousands of years ahead of development: 5500 years.

Let's check also how many years have humans modifyed the horse population and environment: 37000 years.
Let's check how many years have amerindians affected the camelids of South-America, when the spaniards came: 16500 years. They had less than half the time, yet they already domesticated diverse species for food and whool. Llamas can carry up to 50 Kg.

So, it's safe to affirm. Incas were superior to europeans. Their higher development rate was excellent compare to europeans.

And I didn't mention the disadvantages such as continental isolation (north-south and east-west), Niño fenomena that destroys coastal villages, less cultures to trade with, and no naval technology, iron, horses, wheel, and writting from north-african nor anatolian cultures.

>>3244926
So the mongrel doesn't know how to read. Hmm... Maybe it's the eurangutan genes...

>>3244934
Man you gotta be some kind of assblasted Peruvian to draw this type of conclusion. Don't worry, your women flocked to the BSC.

>>3244932
>>3244865
>>3244951
>103 failed attempts of goalshifting
>still cannot prove Inca superiority wrong
It's time to pray to your lake gods, eurangutan. They'll get mad if you don't do it in time.

>>3244934
Aside from you totaly ignoring My post and Just starting to fling shit I'm gonna try to correct your autism

Wow you really don't know that the advent of agriculture was made possible by crops that mutated to survive the glacial period, and that these crops became manageble around 10000 bc wich made agriculture possible. Humans went 250000 years without agriculture and Discovery's it all around the same time how do you think that came

Also comparing the european bronze age with the Inca bronze age is laughable, incas where only coldsmithing copper while the european bronze age involved the actual melting of copper and tin wich where gained through intricate tradenetworks

it's embarrassing that euros think
>muh dik
is an argument

why don't you go steal some arguments from middle easterners like you stole their agriculture and metallurgy?

>>3244934
>suddenly start talking about isolation

You Just gave him more shitposting weapons man

>>3244975
Wonder what mental gymnastics he'll do to refute this

File: inca melting.png (261KB, 638x434px) Image search: [Google]

261KB, 638x434px

>>3244975
>muh deglaciation
10000BC first crops on europe
8000BC end of the glaciation
>tradenetworks with the one of the most ancient of civilizations
Hmm...
>european bronze age
>melting of copper and tin
Incas did it.
Also, when did europeans managed to melt both of them completely? hehehe
>>3245006
All wrong.

Incas were superior to europeans. History demonstrates it. Get over it, chimpo.

>>3245018
But the Incas are gone now so it doesn't really matter, and most of their descendants live in shitholes. If they were so superior than surely their descendants could form a functioning nation? I mean, they have the same technology now. Why is Peru not half as good as most of Europe?

>>3245018
Oh My god you are stupid

>>3245059
>60-80% death
>elites and middle-high class executed, the rest assimilated by eurangutans
>literally all males were thrown to the mines until they died due to toxic mercury or mental diseases for centuries
>the social selection radically morphed for 300-400 years
Hmm...So you agree Incas were superior to europeans. Then let's put eurangutans under the same conditions... they aren't inferior, right? This will be nothing for eurangutans, don't you think?

>Sociopolitics
So you want to discuss Peru history, or you want to trivialize all conditions to some factors? Choose, monkey.

>>3245067
ikr

>>3245098
I know exactly why Peru is a dump, and it's not because of any genetic inferiority. But if they were a superior race like you're claiming then surely they should've overcome these problems by now right? You can't blame it on colonialism like the Africans, you've remnant independent since 1821.

>>3245112
hey /his/torians remember that chile is cool and peru drools
they be chinky indian shitstain on the face of iberoamerica ok goodbye

>>3245112
Wrong.
All the history mentioned here >>3244934 already demonstrated Inca superiority.

>60-80% death
>elites and middle-high class executed, the rest assimilated by eurangutans
>literally all males were thrown to the mines until they died due to toxic mercury or mental diseases for centuries
>the social selection radically morphed for 300-400 years
The social casts and discrimination was almost the same till 1900.

So if you want to compare both ethnic groups then shouldn't we put both on the same conditions?

File: 5DD5FD40-2ED3-4FC3-A3C2-A295DFAA68B4-1661-00000140AAE12F2F.jpg (4KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 225x225px

Daily reminder that Moctezuma bathed at least twice a day, mean while bathing was considered "dangerous" in Europe at the time.

>>3245299
>bathing was considered "dangerous"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bathing#Medieval_.26_early-modern_Europe

>>3241740
>gold
>rock

Is there any alternate history fiction where Amerindians Afro-Eurasia were the technologically inhibited ones and Amerindians came to dominate the Earth?

>>3245313
https://youtu.be/XI4fex06rc4

>>3242266
>Incatard
>The message in the screen is in portuguese

So american from your part.

>>3245337
He is a moor. Their brain cannot differentiate beween jungles and mountains.

File: Inca_man_battle_station.jpg (154KB, 780x746px) Image search: [Google]

154KB, 780x746px

>>3245337
This. use this better.

>>3241850
>Today in history that never happened

>>3241784
T. Dumbass who doesn't ubderstand how and why plagues work

>>3241784

To be fair, Smallpox was brought to the Americas by a black slave the Spanish brought to help move all of the golden artifacts they would be melting down.

>>3245018
Wow you really think the snow dissapeared over the whole world in Just one year?

You're not really proving your Inca superiority with your handicapped aswers

>>3246593
Explain.

>>3246612
Ice was already retreating in 11000 bc, agriculture developped in subtropical areas

>>3241771
Fuck off Pablo.
I hate generic western "civilization". I rather have incan or Aztec

>>3246813
I read that the first crop was lentils on europe. Which population made it possible? I mean, what kind of culture did it?

>>3244903
>>3241766
>Archaeologists have found the remains of 42 children sacrificed to Tlaloc (and a few to Ehecátl Quetzalcóatl) in the offerings of the Great Pyramid of Tenochtitlan.
>While Hernán Cortés was in Tenochtitlan, he heard about other Spaniards arriving on the coast – Pánfilo de Narváez had come from Cuba with orders to arrest him – and Cortés was forced to leave the city to fight them. During his absence, Moctezuma asked deputy governor Pedro de Alvarado for permission to celebrate Toxcatl. But after the festivities had started, Alvarado interrupted the celebration, killing almost everyone present at the festival, men, women, and children alike. Unarmed and trapped within the walls of the Sacred Precinct, an estimated 8,000–10,000 Aztec nobles were killed.

>At this time, when everyone was enjoying the celebration, when everyone was already dancing, when everyone was already singing, they came to close the exits, the steps, the entrances [to the patio]: They attacked the man who was drumming and cut off both his arms. Then they cut off his head [with such a force] that it flew off, falling far away. At that moment, they then attacked all the people, stabbing them, spearing them, wounding them with their swords. They struck some from behind, who fell instantly to the ground with their entrails hanging out [of their bodies]. They cut off the heads of some and smashed the heads of others into little pieces. They struck others in the shoulders and tore their arms from their bodies. They struck some in the thighs and some in the calves. They slashed others in the abdomen and their entrails fell to the earth. There were some who even ran in vain, but their bowels spilled as they ran; they seemed to get their feet entangled with their own entrails.

tldr; The Aztecs sacrificed 42 children in 200 years. On the same spot the Spanish killed 8000 nobles with their children in a couple of hours and started the hostilities with the Aztecs

>>3244926
True but everyone goes on and on about human sacrifice in the americas. You have a eurocentric bias

>>3246593
>handicapped answer
>"this probably happened"
These eurangutans are so funny. Even though their delsuions reject the period before the Neolithic, amerindians achieved more technological feats in less time reaching the bronze age by themselves and developing writing quicker, despite the disadvantages and no north african nor anatolian cultures to give them the wheel, bronze, iron, horses, writting, naval technology, yet amerindians developed some of these by themselves.

Inca superiority remains unrefuted, monkeys. I wonder how many times these chimps tried to change the topic...

>>3244431
Pffffth like someone cares about what the guys who lost to 20 good spaniards thinks. Meanwhile all efforts south of the bio bio river were stopped by not so gullible indians during centuries.

>>3247554
Here take some ointment for your impaled ass.

>>3247265
>tldr; The Aztecs sacrificed 42 children in 200 years

How exactly are you making this claim?

File: The Bioarchaeology of Space and Place Ideology, Power and Meaning in Maya Mortuary Contexts by Gabriel D Wrobel.png (176KB, 745x290px) Image search: [Google]

176KB, 745x290px

>>3247585
>inb4 they sacrificed more in other places
and spaniards slaughtered more in other places

This massacre did not only start the war between the Aztecs and the Spanish, but also happened in the same place where the sacrificed children were been found. Again 8 000 - 10 000 unarmed and innocent people killed, including children. If we consider that only 1% of the people were children that's still twice the amount the Aztec fiends killed in 200 years, not a couple of hours.

>inb4 the Aztecs were literally Hitler for slicing the throats of children
I don't see how is this is better:
>They struck others in the shoulders and tore their arms from their bodies. They struck some in the thighs and some in the calves. They slashed others in the abdomen and their entrails fell to the earth. There were some who even ran in vain, but their bowels spilled as they ran; they seemed to get their feet entangled with their own entrails.

>>3247265

aztecs din'du nuffin

Moctezuma was a good boi

>>3247836
>We killed your kids and we will tell everyone that you did it.

>>3241771
>Rapes, enslaves, and kills everyone while plundering the land of anything valuable
>"""""""civilization"""""""

>>3242187
>He doesn't realise that the discovery of basic metallurgy is basically luck

File: Inca_empire.jpg (106KB, 638x654px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 638x654px

>>3250224
Stay mad

>>3245018
The Wheel.

Coz dey fear the ass tek warriuh coz he was black das rite lmao whitey btfo

>>3250357
Incatard BTFO once again

>>3245308
>Physicians of the period believed that odors, or miasma, such as that which would be found in soiled linens, caused disease. A person could therefore change one's shirt every few days, but avoid baths – which might let the 'bad air' into the body through the pores.

literally from the source u gave

>>3250302
Hehehe eurangutan *goalshifting*
>>3250357
Precolumbian cultures already had the wheel.

Incas were superior to europeans. History demonstrates it. Deal with it, bonobos.

>spics and spic diaspora circlejerk
god I hate spics so goddamn much.

>>3251210
I'd fuck a moor, euros most have so much body hair i bet they wouldnt even notice mine

>>3247537
>developing writing

>>3241771
You forgot the word of the Lord!

>>3251238
I am pretty sure they forgot it too

>>3251234
See>>3251205

Why were pre-Columbian empires so small?

>>3251262
The Inca empire was the biggest nation at that time though.

>>3251287
But pretty small compared to Afro-Eurasian empires of similar technological advancement.

>>3251302
whats an afro-eurasian coutry

>>3251302
Well they got cataclysm'd when they were expanding to the north.

>>3251287
Nope, China.

File: 040814.1400260777661.jpg (459KB, 990x618px) Image search: [Google]

459KB, 990x618px

>>3241958
>outbreak that shrunk the global world population which took 3 centuries to full recover
>small fry

File: 1462050813816.jpg (29KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 500x500px

>>3241930
>Inca Empire
>ultra-dependant administrative system
Where the hell did you get this. While Cusco was the most central city in the empire, there were at least a few others (Quito) and the manner how they ruled was through submission of allegiance to the emperor and by providing what materials were asked of them annually, not by being centrally controlled. Areas outside of Cusco were very autonomous and the Inca Empire was in fact very decentralized when it came to administration and law enforcement. The only "dependancy" the locals had for the Incas were in terms of lawful contracts; if you had a baby with your would-be-wife/husband, the resulting offspring was unlawful in terms of inheritance rights and social status. Only the Inca and their appointed officials (who directly administered their respective areas only once or twice annually) and that was the only dependancy they had. Did you know the areas they "conquered" openly rebelled every time the incumbent emperor deceased?

>>3242045
Do NOT use contemporary terms and suppositions when inspecting past events and conversing the nature of social relations in former polities. Levying workforce and replacing them elsewhere to complete building projects and build a village is NOT socialist in any way. Even if you used Stalinism as a startpoint for what you think of as a "socialist system", the terms you're looking for are "god-king" and "autocracy". Groups of people being utilized for whatever 'greater purpose' the man in charge has in mind for them is in no way socialist; it is simply one powerful figure exerting his authority over many smaller figures to suit his own ends. This is nothing new in a monarchy; this is nothing new in an empire.

>>3242063
They revolted every time the Big Man In Charge changed. The allegiance the conquered regions gave to their conquerors was personal; they were allied only with the emperor, not his bloodline or any backwards notion of an 'Inca nation'.

>>3251402
What was their territory area?

>>3241958
kek.

t. i have no clue what im talking about.

>>3251502
What books did you read? That's interesting. I've read some about Maria rostworowski and some basics precolumbian Peru basics with chronicles.

File: descarga.jpg (12KB, 291x173px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 291x173px

>>3251534
I'll be honest, I've not read a lot on the subject. What I have read, however, I considered quite thorough and convincing.

Here's my source:
"Tawantinsuyu: the Inca state and its political organization" by Martti Pärssinen (1992). It's not very recent by a long shot but then again the nature of new research on a not very popular subject whose evidence has been largely lost to time... there might not even be new research that would invalidate the one I provided.

Also my understanding is that if you're reading the Chronicles you might as well be reading fairytales.

I very much recommend reading Tawantinsuyu if you're interested in the subject.

>>3251575
>Also my understanding is that if you're reading the Chronicles you might as well be reading fairytales.
Actually I've seen quite some unsupported claims bashing the Inca or praising them, yet I didn't post such fantasies here.

I've trivialized the political structure but the main points of the arguments aren't these. I've like to read about the recent findings of the Huaman Poma copies that got lost and were recently found by some dutch people. The Maria Rostworowski books refutes past consensus claims and verifies the history of such events. I remember that her books are academic material used by students on the uni.

Also, I'd like to read the recent research of Gail Silverman's findings about tocapus and Inca symbology.

There are lots of stuff unknow due to the intentional cultural destruction.

Wow people are still replying to this thread?

File: ntHQT71.jpg (30KB, 615x385px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 615x385px

>>3251502
I just realized I mistyped something very badly.

>The only "dependancy" the locals had for the Incas were in terms of lawful contracts; if you had a baby with your would-be-wife/husband, the resulting offspring was unlawful in terms of inheritance rights and social status.
--->
>...had a baby with your would-be-wife/husband WITHOUT BEING DECLARED MARRIED BY THE INCA OFFICIAL DURING HIS ANNUAL VISIT, the resulting offspring...

I'd also like to add that besides having this kind of population control over the social fabric of the populace, the Inca also took heirs from prominent local families to Cusco to "help with the diplomacy", which is to say to keep as hostages. Besides of course the intermarrying the Emperor's family and relatives to local leaders and vice versa.

My feeling right now for fucking up so bad.

>>3251623
Well, I haven't read Maria Rostworowski's works (though I think Pärssinen did mention her in the book as far back as 1992?), the central idea in Tawantinsuyu is that the Inca Empire expanded very rapidly and to refute past concensuses. Maybe take a look because that sounds very similiar to how you described her work?

>>3251645
Did you hear about the mitimaes?

>>3247265
>42 found
>must be all of them

>>3251684
Yeah she mentions also that the Incas weren't a monarchy with one "monarch" or head of the state. She mentions that there were two Incas; i don't remember if she refered to the separation of regions or the administrative and population control labour to the militar projects and army control.

>>3251690
>no iron found on the Inca empire
>there was no iron

>>3242159
More like, incas were inferior to europeans and history demonstrated that.

>>3251690
learn to fucking read you piece of shit >>3247836

>>3251705
Wrong. Amerindians accomplished more civic and technological advancements than eurangutan "civilizations".

Incas were superior to europeans. History demonstrates it. Get over it, subhuman.

>>3242187
Holy shit man. Do you think people who travel to the Americas went empty handed? Cultural evolution has happened while people have moved across continents and if you don't recall, there was an ice age that covered the majority of europe? The Incas had inferior technology and inferior armies. They had inferior medicine nad inferior infrastructure. Fascinating cultures existed throughout the Americas but trying to compare how "superior" they were to European cultures just makes you look retarded.

>>3241966
>There were no Noble Savages; no Beautiful, irreplaceable cultures.
Every culture is irreplaceable and the study of history loses something when lost cultures can't be properly studied or understood anymore.

>>3251717
Wrong. They started again in the paleolithic and had to morph the environment of woods, jungles and coasts to their convenience, the same the europeans did with their environment for thousands of years before the Neolithic.

All archeological evidence shows that all populations back then were nomads with paleolithic "technology" and had to develop their own civilizations before their neolithic phase.

Thus, history demonstrates Inca superiority. Deal with it, eurangutan subhuman.

>>3251689
Yes. What about them?

>>3251698
That sounds a lot like what I read on Tawantinsuyu. Pärssinen claimed that the Incan "rule of three" extended to their manner of kingship as well, perhaps as to as many as three main players. IIRC he didn't elaborate how their responsibilities were divided and he underlined that he didn't have enough evidence to prove his theory.

>>3251715
Would you please stop saying that. Even if that were the case, no-one is going to accept it if you present it thus.

>>3251737
Not me. I think there are three shitposters. I've replied to you because I want to know about the Incas without spergs throwing shit at each other.
Yeah the rule three is interesting. Have she explained something about the mitimaes on the book yourl read?

If the Inca tocapus were a kind of writing it would be a new window towards ancient history. We know nothing about the Tiwanaku and the supposed lack of rains before the Incas. We also don't know about the Batan Grande archeological site.

File: pizarro.jpg (177KB, 590x387px) Image search: [Google]

177KB, 590x387px

>>3250335
my nigga pizarro. I don't know shit about the conquistadors but when I came to this thread I thought
>"Who was that dope ass dude who has statues all over spain and raped his way across South America?"

ITS THAT NIGGA PIZARRO

>>3242460
>Wrong. Natives beat the Inca. Eurangutans just kept backstabbing each other, even their own kind hehehe
I know you're a troll by this point. But who were back stabbing whom again? If the Spaniards used natives to defeat other natives until they eventually all defeated themselves, who were the back stabbers?

>>3251770
>Who was that dope ass dude who has statues all over spain
Sadly that is not true

>>3251787
>some celts used the romans to defeat their enemy
>backstab
Simple. Check the assasination of pizarro. Check the assasination of the kidnapped Inca. Truly an eurangutan tradition to backstab everyone. Even then Incas weren't defeated against the huge threats of the other natives and the rebellions. Eurangutans had to bring their reinforcements to do anything of importance against the remnants of the Inca army.

Incas were superior to europeans. How many times are eurangutans gonna pathetically change the topic? Hehehe

>>3251807
I thought he has statues in Trujillo, Madrid and malaga?

Jesus this is the worst thread I have ever read, congratulations.

>Inca anon has told /his/ the thread
Why is this allowed?

Fuck Europeans my nigga

>>3241850
>ten thousand years
>500 years later and only history buffs really know your name

>>3242188
There were also plans to invade China with Japanese help, although the state ultimately didn't approve them. And some absolute madmen actually attacked Cambodia.

>>3242459
He's probably the same guy who shitposts about turkey and wh*ites. He's probably not peruvian or turkish but some butthurt american nigger.

>>3242843
Not each other, it was one sided. Nahuas and incas were, respectively, the germanigs of their cultural areas. The spaniards did a favour to Mesoamerica and the Andes.

>>3243693
It literally is, Mr. Orangutan.

>>3247265
More like the "small" percentage found of children boiled alive goes up to the astounding number of 42. Archeological findings are always a small part of what actually was there.

And all that without counting the others, killed and tortured but not in the name if Tlaloc.

>>3251841
>three fucking cities, two completely irrelevant

File: 62acfd31a6b84bec21b769fdc3437af68fb460be8f8c5966e011b7ecacaabe79.png (272KB, 817x669px) Image search: [Google]

272KB, 817x669px

>>3251770
>mfw I literally live in Pizarro Street

>this thread is still alive
spics are truly subhumans.

>>3255206
Moor detected.

>>3255237
No evidence of such things.

>>3241740
I7ll be honest with you anon, it was a surprise to the whole of Europe that the Spaintards could get up for a few seconds from their drug addled siesta to ride a boat.

So when they managed to get to South America we just kept watching to see what would happen.

>>3247265
BASED

>>3241740
Believeing that shit was real. And cosplay wasn't around you sad nigger you can jerk off to cosplay whores dressed as mesoamericans still get out

>>3251690
>muh 6 billion sacrifices aztecs be evil n shit

>>3241740
meshica women were never this white, and never dressed this way, obv, gtfo w this anime online ad bullshit

>>3241766
>tfw i'm i'll read about this and have never heard of nezahuacoyotl and the reformation of the meshica state religion

>>3246851
This. at least we still have the Mapuche.

>>3244275
>TFW NEVER HEARD OF NEZAHUACOYOTL AND THE REFORM OF THE MEXICA STATE RELIGION

how r u ppl this DENSE. research something before you act like you know all about it!

>>3257037
They are not people. They are "eurangutans".

You have to speak purely with facts so these chimps can have a chance to understand at least one word they "read".

File: (You).jpg (71KB, 1024x512px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 1024x512px

>>3241850
>ywn stand on top of Tenochtitlan's Great Pyramid and receive the submission of the multitudes
you'd certainly be the first since that never actually happened

>>3242012
1. Dude was Hungarian
2. Many historical sources talk about how the cannon took so long to reload and fire that the defenders were able to fix the damage it caused by the time it was able to fire again.
3. Constantiople fell because the Genoan commander who was keeping the Turks away died and Constantinople fell soon after.

File: 66139035de3514c2f0945068e7bdb3ef.jpg (107KB, 736x1211px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 736x1211px

>Be young hotblooded Poortuguese sailor
>Spend countless days in filthy ship surrounded by hairy Moorish men
>suddenly discovers a new land
>explores the jungle
> see this
what do?

File: Hispanized.jpg (253KB, 600x748px) Image search: [Google]

253KB, 600x748px

>>3258648

>>3258676
Lewd

File: RG 42.gif (2MB, 396x304px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 396x304px

>>3247265
>That fucking KDR

File: isaac newton.jpg (413KB, 780x1074px) Image search: [Google]

413KB, 780x1074px

This man single handily shits on the entire history of Incan science

>>3258726
>anything after amerindian pestilence genocide
Nope. Incas were superior to europeans. Get over it, chimpo.

>>3258736
but if they were superior, they should of been able to beat the europeans


also Newton single handily shits on the entire collective thought of Incan scientists

>>3258742
They did numerous times, yet the superior numbers against them from bigger cultures and the later reinforcements of the spanish army, couldn't make them recover from the 90% deaths from the pestilence.
When did newton lived?

Inca superiority is a historical fact. Deal with it.

>>3242408
sauce on those Egyptian swords in Scandinavia? I studied Egyptology in college and don't remember reading about that. I'm genuinely interested.

>>3258648
The odds of someone that voluptuous in the jungle would be very rare. But accuracy aside, I would turn into a Nacho Videl so fast.

Spanish empire was built on silver, not gold

File: i happen to be an expert in this subject.jpg (158KB, 850x1162px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 850x1162px

>>3241984
Asians are white.

>>3247265
>warfare is equal to killing for fun
Retard. Aztecs got what was coming to them, hence why the Tlaxcalans joined the Spanish.

>>3259866
>warfare
>killing unarmed men and children in the middle of a celebration
Nope.

>>3259882

>Implying

>>3259884
Another united statian that can't read what he is criticizing. How am I not surprised?

>>3259904

>Implying

>>3259915
Hmm?

>>3259918
Your right, I was wrong and I promise I won't do it again. I'm having some problems at home at the moment.

>>3259922

I won.

>>3259922
>>3259923
Do eurangutans behave like this when they realize their mistakes?

>>3259927

Double win.

>>3259931
Hey chill, boy. Are you okay? Those are just words.

File: rorby Swords Denmark.jpg (14KB, 525x266px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 525x266px

>>3258766
First I found, those could be made in denmark but they have a style than reminds Eastern Med/Egypt.

File: Flint Swords.jpg (57KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 800x600px

>>3259986
And the flint ones.

I seriously am amazed by eurochimps' level of denial concerning Inca superiority

>>3260860
Low quality imitation.

whatever you think about these facts, being one of those conquistadores and getting to explore an entire new and majestic civilization, while being considered literal gods, must have been something that few people experienced in human history

>>3260860
> eurochimps

IS EURANGUTAN YOU FUCKING COPYCAT!!!!!

File: 1280px-Krumsvärd._Early_Scandinavian_Bronze_Age_sword.jpg (91KB, 1280x514px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 1280x514px

>>3259986
>they have a style than reminds Eastern Med/Egypt.

What? No they don't, they look quintessentially Scandinavian Bronze Age.

>>3242387

Bronze is extremely heavy, that armor would have been worn by a charioteer not by a footman, and with the end of the Bronze Age, chariot use died out in favor of horseback riding. Cavalry have a number of advantages over chariots, but one drawback they have is that you can't armor a cavalryman as heavily as you can a charioteer, at least not before the development of plate steel armor.

I heard somewhere that the Aztecs never had a lot of gold. Whatever they used to make their roofs shined like gold and Cortez thought they just had a bunch of it somewhere.

Is that true?

>>3261680

They didn't have anything like as much as the Inca, but they had much more than Spain (or any European country).

>>3241740
If the Nahuas won, could we have seen Western values die off like Aztec values have?

Or are our system of ethics inherently better, and that is why they, and we, survive.

>>3244275
>real morality doesn't exist guys
That entire post shunned immorality set in the guise of self-righteousness. Could you strawman any harder?