Is this guy a good historian?

He is a bad historian, he gets a lot of stuff wrong

>>3230006
He's all right.

But Niall Ferguson isn't right about things as much as Nial Fergunson thinks.

>>3230015
just cause he doesn't suck left wing dick doesn't make him a bad historian

>>3230039
did you read his post, you insecure brainlet? He said HE GOT STUFF WRONG. He said nothing about leftism. You're post is hardcore projection

File: article-0-082D0D40000005DC-606_468x630[1].jpg (58KB, 468x630px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 468x630px

He's the chad among historians. Probably makes more money shilling for Wall Street than all the leftwings guy put together, plus he gets to bang this qt.

>“Hey Faggots, My name is Niall, and I hate every single one of you.

>>3230006
If you want economic history, he's fantastic. I'm less clear on some of his other stuff, particularly his talk about how Britain got into WWI.

>>3230015
What does he get wrong?

>>3230006
He documented the history of the House de Rothschild which I am keen to check out, anyone read it? How is he "right-wing"? Is that left-wing speak for "someone who understands economics"?

He's a Jewish stooge.

>>3233250
Lindybeige wankery with citations.

With a side of "the British empire was great so it's up to America to keep the empire going."