Red Pill me on Fomenko and New Chronology

I don't know, but i think he tried to claim that there was a giant Slav-Turkish empire called the "Russian Horde" that had a huge influence on history but was erased in the history books from westerners

isn't this the guy that said Jesus was born in 1200 ad?

>>3227082
what?

File: 4 posts 2 posters.jpg (2KB, 112x57px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 112x57px

>>3227082
2 posts, 1 poster

this means that

>>3226514
>>3226535
>>3227077
>>3227222
are all the same person

File: 461ab3ed3d7b.jpg (305KB, 850x626px) Image search: [Google]

305KB, 850x626px

>>3226535
This, that is pretty much the claim. He and Nosovsky started off with "the current chronology is wrong, because math" but then ended up with claiming there was a huge Russo-Horde Empire spanning the globe but then the butthurt Westerners managed to rebel and undertook a faking of history spanning a century.

Guy's a legit mathematician and also a very good illustrator (pic related), but the New Chronology while interesting, makes some incredibly wild claims and ignores a lot of methodology of history and linguistics.

>>3226514
He is just a STEMfag trolling historians

>>3227928
is he actually a celebrated mathematician?

>>3230001
It seems so. He has been a member of the Russian Academy of Science for decades, has more than a hundred published works and wrote 10 math textbooks, many of which were translated into other languages. The wiki mentions him as a "a specialist in geometry and topology, variational calculus, symplectic topology, Hamiltonian geometry and mechanics, and computational geometry." He's also an editor of scientific journals in mathematics and received a state prize for excellence in his field. I don't know if he can be considered celebrated, but he seems pretty well-known and doesn't appear to be a fraud when it comes to mathematics.

>>3227401
EMBARRASSING!

>>3226514
Browsed through the first four books of the New Chronology. Even if 90% of it is bullshit, the remaining 10% throws serious doubts on the Scaligerian chronology and "world history". Remember, contradictions dont exist in nature. They are either an error or a lie. Fomenko's work presents enough glaring contradictions with the popular narrative to question much of history.

>>3226514
>>3230632
Check his books and methods out for yourself on archive . org. Even if his new chronology is nonsense, his mathematical methods and astronomical dating of history deserve recognition and should be employed by historians who seek to honestly expand our understanding of history.

>>3226514
didn't he say the Roman Empire never existed?

>>3233340
I'm not sure, but he recognizes there have been three Romes throughout history: Rome in Italy, Constantinople as Rome, and Moscow as (New) Rome.

File: Middle-Ages Chronological_shift_362.jpg (163KB, 624x815px) Image search: [Google]

163KB, 624x815px

>>3233340
Not exactly. He claimed the classical Roman empire of Antiquity never existed. But a succession of "Roman" empires did exist after the IX century AD, with some hypothetical "Rome" in Medieval Egypt, the second in Byzantium and the third Moscow.

He also claimed the HRE before the 1600s was an extension of the Russian Empire and those Habsburg were some sort of governors of the Western provinces of this empire.

>>3233368
Those dynastic parallels throughout the new chronology are fascinating.

>>3226514
Fomenko documents and examines some of Isaac Newtons chronological work which was interesting. Newton believed the histories and chronologies of classical Greece and Egypt were inaccurate and distorted. Newton spent many decades working on chronology.