Stirner and Right-Wing philosophy and theory

Why would anyone try to attach Stirner to a 'wing'? To attach a thinker who advocates complete individualism, to a collective.

What a ridiculous premise

>>3217725
Because our brains are pattern seeking organs that compartmentalize reality and dont just judge every single occurence individually, if we did, we would be second guessing every single moment of our existence.

>OH WELL I CANT ASSUME THAT LION OVER THERE IS JUST LIKE THE OTHERS AND WILL MAUL ME IF I GET TOO CLOSE, WERE ALL INDIVIDUALS AFTER ALL
^^^"Individuals" who die off quickly

>>3217773
This has to be a facetious interpretation or, most likely, you just haven't read a single page of Stirner.

I'll leave you to it.

File: Leftycancer3.png (514KB, 760x482px)

514KB, 760x482px

>>3217725
Tell them

>>3217835
I'm taking Stirner's logic to it's conclusion, his individual fetishizing illustrates a lack of understanding of what collectives are.

>>3217714
>Stirner's egoism
>a philosophy about ruthlessly bettering your station
>a philosophy about taking things by force, regardless of current "laws"
Only brainlets can't see the connection.

The only difference between a far-right egoist and a far-left egoist is that the far-right egoist drastically overestimates his abilities and the fairness of the capitalist system, and swears fealty to it despite a high chance that he will be its slave for life. A far-left egoist realizes that the capitalist system is bent in a thousand different ways to protect the already rich, and to attain that status has little to do with intelligence or dedication but instead luck. So he fights to level the playing field, free himself from his wage masters, and create a system where he actually can improve his station. That everyone else's lives are made better at the expense of a few porkies' fortunes is just a side effect of him pursuing his own interests.