How did Neoliberalism become the only successful modern ideology?
>neoliberalism
>successfulll
>>3209672
On the surface it seems successful
fuck you, That's Keynesian economics in play
>>3209700
there would be no bust, only boom if kensian was real
>>3209700
>Keynesian economics and Neoliberalism are mutually exclusive.
>>3209720
t. Krugman
>>3209721
Krugman is a NL
Krugman is keynesian
Keynesianism is also part of Neoliberalism
>>3209735
No it isn't, kike. Fuck off with your syncretism.
>>3209700
I tend to agree. I think the late 20th century shift from Keynesianism to neoliberal economic policy is a little overstated. The truth is, private sector activity is still heavily guided by the incentives which public policy creates. Take the defense industry for example - billions of dollars in capital invested and millions of private sector jobs supported by the market distortions which public spending creates. And I don't think this is an accident. Lots of governments bypass the so-called free market "consensus" by making little tweaks to their budget which inevitably have the effect of allocating private capital in ways they don't directly control.
I get all happy when I imagine the utopia the world would be if anarcho-capitalism was implemented. Literally the whole world would be first world. Neoliberalism is meh tier.
Successful ideologies define left and right on their own own terms.
Failed ideologies let themselves be defined by left and right.
>>3209670
what about Socialism with Chinese Characteristics?
>>3209861
Would only work if we slaughtered all the muds and expanded white lebensraum to cover the entire planet.
>>3209886
You mean National Socialism 2.0?
>>3209894
Nice picture. Feelsgoodman
>>3209903
sure
>>3209920
Get out of here with those commieblocks
>>3209886
It's baically just Neoliberalism just with SOE and indifference to IP controls. US has Military Inustrial Congressional comples, China has State Owned Enterprises
>>3209894
that pic is the result of your attempt
you want the top pic to happen again?
>>3209721
>implying
t. Bernanke
>socialist and fascist neckbeards will not defend this
>>3209700
This. Neoliberalism is squandering the success that Keyanianism had made since 1980s
>>3211944
>if you live with 3$ per day you aren't poor
Sure anon
The true power of neoliberalism
>>3211972
Absolute poverty
>thinking you are poor because you can't buy a new 4k television
>>3209672
How is it not successful?
>>3209670
Because you only need to convince a tiny circle of politicians and moneymen who make all the decisions. The masses are powerless to resist.
>how did (incredibly loaded question)?
Its a simple shitpost formula, but lets see how it does.
>>3209670
Capitalism is genocide
>>3211944
It fell because of industrialization, anon. For the first time in history the average shlub could get a better paying job as a wage-cuck in a factory instead of slaving away on a farm barely hovering above the point of starvation. This was true everywhere, even in places that adopted a command economy such as the Soviet Union.
>>3212010
>>thinking you are poor because you can't buy a new 4k television
false equivalence, it's more like
>thinking you are poor because you're thousands of dollars in undischargeable dept to the government thanks to student loans, you're facing crippling medical costs, your house is underwater, which you are having to pay the mortgage with a wage which hasn't budged since the early 1970's, and you will not enjoy as good of a quality of life enjoyed by your parents and grandparents, who will probably live a few years longer than you did.
But hey, at least you have a nice tv...