>consistently underperforming armies, bad doctrine and armaments design for almost the entire war
>only saving grace is a lopsided supply situation all but guaranteeing an allied victory
>xDDD the allied generals were so good... because, because they won!
Why do redditors say this?
>>3208600
but it's true though. I've listened to people who genuinely think monty was a great general because he beat a ragtag army half his size, even while they're unwilling to admit that this was an achievement because the germans were kicking the brits ass all over africa up until then
etc
>>3208521
Have you ever been as far even as decided to want to go do look more like an individuals in context of wanting to go do look more than half like the premise?
>>3208521
Because supply situations don't just come out of nowhere, but are themselves products of planning, both on the civilian side and the military side, in things like arranging your war production and what you bring to the battlefield and where you attack
.>>3208707
And rommel's army at El Alamein was ragtag and packing less than a third of the Axis forces in North Africa precisely be caused he decided it would be a good idea to move over 1,500 km away from his primary port when he had no real means of moving his shit from Tripoli to the frontline.
Logistics wins wars. Stay mad stormnigger.
>>3208918
>Logistics wins wars.
lel
>>3208930
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vifYelSTlMo
>>3208600
you, I like you
>>3208999
Why le thank ye, m'good sir, m'brave sir, true gentleman and scholar.
>>3208600
bugs..
Yeah man outrunning your horse-drawn supply lines is a good idea. Fucking 10/10 doctrine.
>>3209158
dat battle of france