Why did he hate private property so much?

File: pepestirner.jpg (26KB, 331x334px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 331x334px

Someone kept taking it from him, cause he's too beta to defend his own.

God made the Earth for all of us to share.

also who wants to pay to get medical treatment and to live somewhere? that's like money having a monopoly on life, USELESS COTTON WADS

he wuz kangz

>>3206388
Because property is theft.

>>3206388
If he hated private property so much, why didn't he make his property public?

>the history of all hitherto existing societies is the history of class struggles

literally sentence 1 chapter 1 from the manifesto. and he didn't hate private property, he just thought it was inadequate for human dignity and knew that it would make its way off the historical stage in its turn

File: the hyde.gif (2MB, 202x360px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 202x360px

>>3206388
when the state takes your stuff consider it a favor
he was severely oppressed living in his house selling his family's cloths so he can write his poetry of how much he hates himself

>>3206451
>and knew that it would make its way off the historical stage in its turn
but it didn't

marx wasn't just a dude who didn't like things. he literally began his philosophy at feuerbachs destruction of german idealism. even today philosophy can't seem to come to terms with hegel, no one expects to understand deleuze without reading him and all you ignoramuses think you understand marx, i mean jesus you don't even understand hegel!

>>3206458
>capital will chase its way around the globe and remake everything in its image
>most of the world is still underdeveloped

mate. feudalism existed for a millennia and the majority of the worlds population was only recently still peasants. only in the last 30 years did china integrate into the world economy. we won't be alive in 100 years but even the brainlets will be able to see how right marx has been then

>>3206388

he was a pet philosopher, a step higher than a NEET

thus his reasoning revolve around his own experiences of inadequacy and helplessness

>>3206473

oh no the ebil capitalism giving us all food and smartphones oh lord if only we had listened to this wise marx!

>>3206559
>smartphones

useless shit, underage out

>>3206388
It leads to exclusivity and having things you can't have constantly and annoyingly flaunted in front of you. Socialism also despises the traditional family structures like extended family for all the nepotism and constant infighting and clan and tribal struggle it creates. Marx in the 1800's was only looking for a logical solution to such eternal problems.

>>3206559
Probably not much different from a lab rat being addicted to crack.

>>3206388
Because it lead to the clear divide of bourgeois and proletariat.

Because the kike never worked a day in his life and was angry that people can own things if they worked for it

>>3206473
Except marx thought that the revolutions in the 19th century were already proving him right.
Apparently he was off by several centuries.

>>3206388
Because he was a parasite and his understanding of economics is extremely dated.

>>3206599
>Seest thou a man prompt in his business? Before kings shall he stand, he shall not stand before men who are obscure.
Written centuries before the advent of industrious Christists.

>>3206388
>>3206444
Private property =/= personal property. What one man and his family own in terms of stuff that fits in his house doesn't matter. What matters is the means of production, which should not be privately owned, but publicly owned.

>>3206654
how do you differ between private and personal property?
If I use my kitchen to make cakes, and then i sell those, is my kitchen private or personal property?

>>3206654
And if the means of production are my personal property?

>>3206654
The private/personal property distinction is extremely malleable and subjected to whatever change the collective/vanguard/dictator decides to enact.

>>3206609
>and his understanding of economics is extremely dated.
Marx was probably the last time anyone attempted to form a cohesive understanding of economics as a whole. Present day economists are comparable to alchemists in that they merely exploit phenomena whose underlying processes they don't understand.

>>3206654
But comrade, that oven in your kitchen can be use how a mean of production, cheka is coming for (you) for reeducation.