So does /his/ think Austria-Hungary was justified in declaring war on Serbia? Why or why not?
>>3194719
>"Rogue" head of military intelligence organizes the assassination of the heir to the Austro-Hungarian throne.
Serbia had it coming.
>>3194719
>Be monarchy
>Shit people assassinate your heir.
Yeah, a lot.
morally? yes, assassination isn't a good thing anon
rationally? nah you shouldn't bat a beehive unless you have the power
Technically it was an internal matter, Princip was an Austrian citizen as were all Young Bosnians
Then again they got their weapons from Serbia and Black Hand's meddling is obvious
>>3194719
>Harbouring terrorist who kills the crown prince
What do you expect?
>>3194719
Serbia did almost all of the demands
The only one they missed was telling them that they completed the list
>>3194719
I'm pretty sure the Austrians had been meaning to expand and destroy Serbia anyway, like when they sent the demands to the Serbian government after the assassination (I don't remember what exactly) but it was really outrageous, and the Serbs were forced to refuse so it sparked WWI.
>>3195540
They wanted to hold trials in Den Haag, instead of letting the Austrians occupy Serbia and took control of 'only' the investigations there. The Austrians refused and then declared war.