He was the best Tsar in Russian history. Prove me wrong.
>>3192142
Facts can't be proven wrong anon
He's a dirty backstabber who ruined everything. He could have helped make Europe great!
>>3192169
How?
>>3192284
Napoleon i assume
I was going to say pic related was the best, but then I remembered that he didn't prepare his son to rule.
>>3192169
He really was duplicitous. If the war hadn't happened they could have shared influence again like after Tsilt. Britain was on the eve of significant unrest due to the economy.
>>3192142
SPERANSKY DESERVED BETTER. ALEXANDER PRETENDED TO BE "LIBERAL" BUT TURNED "LE MYSTICAL AUTOCRAT" BECAUSE HE NEVER WAS SERIOUS ABOUT GIVING POWER. HE WAS TSAR NICHOLAS II "1.0"
>>3194615
Also, fuck arakcheev, that cunt
>>3192500
he turned back all the progressive reform of Alexander ii which means that a revolution was a ticking timebomb
>>3194633
but witte...
>>3192142
>Any Tsar
>Good
>>3192142
Ivan
>>3192169
The only backstabber of Europe (and the Americas) is Napoleon Bonaparte
>>3194960
Spot the Anglo
>>3194633
I'm not even sure continuing the liberalization of Russia would have even helped in the short term. Socialists still would have terrorized much like they did against Alexander II and a revolution would still have been inevitable, but I do think long-term the idea of a democratic Russia would have taken root leading to less corruption/authoritarianism after the USSR fell and the Russian Federation emerged
>>3195050
>I'm not even sure continuing the liberalization of Russia would have even helped in the short term
this. so-called "liberal" states were also wracked with terrorism.
>>3194984
This game is far too EZ
>>3192169
t. Frog
I unironically dislike him. He should have kept his word to mon tru empeurer.