What are the flaws of a single-party system?

>>3188207
Narrow minded

Complacency

they aren't getting challenged so they circlejerk

You will have less competition because the state will be more inclined to nepotism.

The reason is that the member of the party will give favours to family member and etc.

File: 1500944272323.jpg (37KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 600x600px

>>3188207
Nobody will ever find out because there is no opposition platform to hold the party to account.

>>3188207
Corruption. Flagrant institutionalized corruption.

>>3188677
Corruption is endemic to any government

>>3188689
It's more apparent and persistent in a single-party system because there's no real incentive for reform. In a multi-party system the opposition can champion reform to get elected, but without an alternative most people just accept the level of corruption and pray it doesn't get too flagrant.

>>3188689
>Corruption is endemic to any government

>He says while comfortably posting on his computer, the only connection he has ever had with the police or government his tax return every year for his life

Uh huh.

File: bo.jpg (22KB, 660x371px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 660x371px

>>3188635
Bullshit. There is plenty of competition in a single party state - within the party. Factionalism is a helluva drug.

The way Xi Jinping destroyed Bo Xilai is beautiful, simply beautiful.

>>3188207
There is no flaw if there are no alternatives.

File: 2333338.png (749KB, 949x729px) Image search: [Google]

749KB, 949x729px

>>3188207
Instead of multiple parties you just get a single party that's split on the issues that would be addressed by separate parties.

It's just not as transparent as multi-party.

No way to ensure genuine loyalty to the party ideology after the first generation, so you wind up with rule by sycophants and social climbers, who often undo the work of the revolutionaries who founded the one-party state.

This is why ML states fell to counter-revolution.