If a robot looks like a human, acts like a human, and suffers

>>3182575
No, fucking destroy it before it replaces us.

>>3182714
so, treat it like other humans

>>3182739
No, if we treated it like other humans we'd rape it first

>>3182575
Such an abomination should never be created in the first place, for it's own good.

>Let's create a homunculus people will naturally resent and abuse so it can serve as our slave.
Fucking vile idea.
>We won't treat it bad or force it to work!
So then what's the point? Just have a kid like a normal person.

>>3182760
>morals will beat technology
get real grandma

>>3182760
>Putting feelings in the way of technology

>>3182760
>just have a kid like a normal person
CS is full of trannies for a reason...

>>3182767
>>3182848
>morals will beat technology
It will when there is literally no reason to create something.

>>3182983
Creation is the reason unto itself, fgt.

>>3182575
Not unless it actually is one.

File: frankenstein.jpg (21KB, 339x271px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 339x271px

>>3182575
ITT, we Frankenstein.

Bonus points if you can pronounce Karel Čapek correctly, and know why that's relevant without looking it up.

>>3182575
Should we treat a man that looks, smells, sounds, and acts like a woman like hey are one? The answers are the same.

File: le smug replicant man.jpg (70KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 900x900px

Yes

File: 0uro_caza024.jpg (154KB, 620x736px) Image search: [Google]

154KB, 620x736px

guess who would give them rights?

>>3182575
Yes.

>>3182740

Is it like terminator with living tissue or is it just rubber?

Though if I had some lube, I'd be ok with the rubber.

>>3182575
If those are all the case then it IS a human.