What does /his/ know about the Boer wars?
>>3162638
The British were extremely cruel and Boers performed very well despite not really being a formal army
>>3162667
>Boers performed very well despite not really being a formal army
How were a bunch of farmers able to hold their own against one of the world's greatest military powers?
>>3162677
Same could be said of the American revolutionaries. Turns out the British were always thrown off guard when they didn't have a 1,000 year tech advantage against their enemies.
>>3162667
>>3162677
Dunno, ask the Americans kek
>>3162667
The camps were holiday camps
>>3162638
Brits are shit fighters that always rely on dirty tricks and atrocities against civilians in order to win.
>>3162677
Because they had modern military equipment and used the terrain to their advantage. The early clashes between the British and the Boers were something a prelude to WW1, with the Boers digging in around important river crossings and slaughtering thousands of British regulars charged with taking their positions.
It didn't take long however for the Boers to collapse as a organized force, unable to stand against the superior numbers, training and material of the British professional forces and disperse into small raiding groups. They were at a supreme disadvantage in artillery, losing most of what little they had in the early stages of the war at the few pitched encounters they took, which had a big effect on the positions they could even consider defending later on.
Why the fuck did Kruger even start the war in the first place?
>>3163195
Bitter Boerewors detected.
>>3163195
You cannot counter guerrilla warfare in a clean way.
I'm actually reading a book about the Boer wars
After the first, which the Boers won, they recieved a tonne of support from major European powers such as Germany, Russia and France. The Boers held several diplomatic missions towards these countries in an attempt to gain a globally recognized and defended neutrality, like Belgium had.
Whenever a country considered voting in favour of it at the next Hague/Geneva conference however, the British would start boasting about their navy and threatning to cut off the other nation's trade routes.
All in all: Eternal Anglo just being the eternal anglo.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPJXPp5TsQQ
From what I've read, something happened in which the Commanding Officers on the British side had went and fucked everything up. General Redvers Buller had lead a march up the mountain of Spion Kop at night to mount a surprise attack the following morning. Little did the British know they had not made their encampment at the peak but in a narrow gulley in between the peak and another high point. Naturally the Boers had a field day with the trapped British troops and Buller resigned immediately after that collosal fuck up.
the Boers had very sexy Mausers.
>>3162692
America literally lost a war against rice farmers.
>>3162677
British army wasnt strong. In fact, war was good for Boers, peace was obvious fail because of British propaganda toward signer - literally betrayer.
>>3162638
>Boers desperate for money
>Brits offer to give money in exchange for the Boers becoming British citizens
>Boers start foaming at the mouth and declare war
>Boers also push for harsher apartheid than what the British wanted them to have
British leadership was incompetent but the Boers were all round cunts