Roman Britain Was More Ethnically Diverse Than Today:

>>3156876
Oh shit, I'm black?!
>tfw cornish and gaelic
B-but why don't I look b-black?

>>3156868
we don't need multiple threads on this made every day

>>3156880
You wrong peckawood you be the creation of Yakub, mastermind of Kemet mang

>>3156884
We really do.
Mainstream media is pumping this shit out, nearly every publication.
It isn't right to let attempts at corruption public knowledge of history to go unanswered.

>>3156888
OH SHEIT!

It was actually less diverse in that it was 99% sub saharan African.

>>3156895
See, I thought so.
BBC whitewashing again.

>>3156892
Is aight whitey I know it be a hard redpill to swallow but at least u #woke now. Now keep listening to da BBC (the channel and muh dik).

>>3156902
I better flagellate myself for allowing the harming of the master race!

I don't have the adjectives to describe what it's like to watch a people get Orwellianly written out of their own history and disinherited from their cultural heritage by their government before your very eyes. Uncanny? Awe inspiring? Terrifying? Absurd? They all fall short.

I wonder if this is what it was it felt like to live in the Soviet Union under Stalin.

>>3156908
Das righ mayne.

>>3156909
Probably similar, just without the overt gulags.

Its a shame this board is so infested because this is a legitimate point of what's going on in the world at the moment. This retroactive multiculturalism is insane. I don't know what its meant to be doing. I mean for fucks sake Tasmania was pretty homogeneous in the 80's even.

So I mean its an odd one. Anyone know what they're trying to achieve?

That being said its not as bad as every historical figure being portrayed as wearing bikers leathers

>>3156868
>Newspapers are writing articles about tweets about this subject
What the fuck is wrong the world.

>>3156943
The purpose I think is to make immigrants and non native people feel like they have a connection to the land's history like everyone else. It's another way to "include" minorities but by doing so it warps reality.

>>3156952
This.
I think this is fairly accurate, at least partly.

>>3156946
Multicultural globalism, which is unstoppable, for now.

>>3156952
I mean I guess that's a sweet idea. But why bullshit? I don't know if you've seen Lucky Man? That was done super well. A well integrated balanced Hindu girl portrayed extremely well. Why throw out your own culture for some nonsense? India was one of the lights of the world at the time of the Romans and Britain was some barbarous shithole

>>3156966
This.

>>3156946
That's how you can tell it matters, and no I don't mean that ironically.

The rewriting of English history and removal of all elements of "white supremacy" (meaning political obligation to prioritize the interests of indigenous britons over foreigners), is so high priority to the establishment that no challenge to it's legitimacy can go unanswered.

File: 1476505437531.jpg (331KB, 517x768px) Image search: [Google]

331KB, 517x768px

>/pol/ still assblasted to no limits

BBC confirmed for based. Keep it strong.

>>3156997
>Rewriting history is cool, because I dislike /pol/.
Get off of /his/ you fucking sophist piece of shart.

Someone post the screencap from the most recent video. The one with the black Celts.

>>3157011
Are you fucking serious?

File: black_celt.png (577KB, 865x647px) Image search: [Google]

577KB, 865x647px

>>3157011
Found it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wtPZhDH4QU8

Yeah the man actually responded to this bullshit, and make no mistake, i'm not a fan of his but it was better than anything posted here as of yet.

Liberals and Conservatives stop being revisionistic faggots please.

Before some faggot from 8/leftypol/ comes to call me a nazi, i'm an actual north african and i'm tired of this shit.

>>3157016
Serious as a heart attack. I can't seem to get to the video myself without a proxy because I get the "Uploader didn't make this available in your country" error.

File: 1286829940742.jpg (58KB, 251x251px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 251x251px

>>3157008
Not gonna explain for the 100th time how there's nothing wrong, culturally and historically in showing black people on roman empire. However, seeing you guys going full "REEEEEEEEE" creating a new thread about this every minute makes me want all historical movies from the next 10 years to be starred by black people only.

It's funny as hell and it amuses me.

File: another_one.png (365KB, 869x649px) Image search: [Google]

365KB, 869x649px

>>3157031

File: c.png (107KB, 401x223px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 401x223px

>>3156908
>>3157025
my sides !

>>3157035
1: You can't read.
2: I didn't say there was.
3: You're a literal sophist.
The video claims that it is a typical typical Roman family in Britain, it isn't.
Roman Britain, not Empire, you understand, dumb dumb?
Also, even in the Empire it wouldn't be 'typical'.
Get fucked.

File: 1407639936674.png (75KB, 3000x2400px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 3000x2400px

>>3157030
>so desperate that now a Youtube vlogger is his defense

It keeps getting better

>>3157051
>

The original thread was an argument against said vlogger

I'm just posting his response.

File: g.jpg (39KB, 1092x614px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 1092x614px

>>3156868

theres some cool African kingdoms , I don't understand why they need to pretend to be European

>>3157049
>"You dumb, dumb, dumb, dumb!"
>"y-y-you sophist"

The irony

>>3157057

Yeah like, if anything this shit is even more racist, it assumes africans had no accomplishments of their own which is false, there are kingdoms Like Mali, Songhai and Ethiopia and even the Kushites, why exactly do they have to do this when there's tons of rich african history to be had.

>>3157060
What irony?
I just wrecked you.
You made a straw man that I claimed there were no blacks in the EMPIRE, as a whole.
My claim was it wasn't typical, because it wasn't and certainly not in Roman Britain you dumb dumb sophist.

>>3157060

You know there's a reason the youth are turning to the right

It's because of faggots like you, cut this shit or we are gonna keep looking like retards.

>>3156868
>we wvz centvrians

>>3157057
>>3157063
This.
I'd like them to play with their own toys and let us keep ours, thanks.

>>3157057
Africans didn't have kingdoms stop trying to appease the liberals.

File: another_one_again.png (669KB, 868x654px) Image search: [Google]

669KB, 868x654px

>>3157031

File: black_baron.png (612KB, 862x648px) Image search: [Google]

612KB, 862x648px

I think the implication is that he is a Baron.

>>3157008

>rewriting history

Projecting too much, assblasted faggot?

If you /pol/ douches had a bit of an IQ and the will to go read a book and get actually educated maybe you would learn that pre-roman Britannia was very fucking scarcley populated, 1M at best, an thus proportionally, the arrival of Imperial soldiers, administrators, bureacrats and etc from all over the Roman provinces, even though very small in nominal numbers, was significative in relation to the total population, and specially in relation to the accountable population, as these guys and families constituted the urban, cultural, economical and political elites.

There's absolutely nothing fucking new over here, you /pol/morons...

>>3157130
Well, that's some pretty delusional supposition.
That will wouldn't make it typical you fucking moron.
And being outraged at history being incorrectly taught isn't /pol/, it is what a good historian, or even a lover of history should do.
So fuck right off.

>>3156909
>Orwellianly
>list of synonyms
my kind gentlesir, master of history, you are truly, indomitably correct and a beacon of light to the Western Civilization you so proud boyly protect by dropping out of college for NEEThood and never reading books after high school!

File: DEA5_o_W0AAs8s7[1].jpg (24KB, 346x524px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 346x524px

>>3157126
Is that CIA in the back?

>>3157179
I think it is!

>>3157178
Literally not an argument, just faggotry.

relax, everyone knows they weren't black, it is just creative license

>>3157196
>Being taught to children, who don't understand the creative license.
Whoa, that's sure okay!
No, as a father, I'd prefer if my children weren't indoctrinated, thanks.

>>3157141

What supposition you faggot?

The 1M figure?

Tbh, I pulled that figure out of my ass. But considering England's popultation in the central middle ages, before the black plague, peaked at around 3M -and that's a fact-, the 1M figure is actually a VERY fucking optimistic estimation I pulled out of my ass.

Did someone post the video to /r/badhistory yet? They'll love it.

>>3157214
>literally allying with Reddit

>>3157212
That still wouldn't make an African mixed family the typical family.
So, are we going full blown denialist now?

>>3157214
I don't post on Reddit, but you're welcome to.

>>3157205
Seeing a few blackamoors is going to totally eradicate their capacity for reason? Sounds more like you neglected to embue them with that capacity to begin with.

>>3157205
>white people never complain when history is whitewashed
>white people go completely apeshit because of a youtube video
really makes me think

File: go trump.jpg (57KB, 874x960px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 874x960px

>>3157217
> allying
The joke here is to make a post critical of leftist shenanigans on reddit of all places.

>>3157223
>Seeing a few.
Are you this delusional?
You see nothing but race mixing propaganda, even in adverts now.
Most families in adverts are either Muslim, or mixed race.
This doesn't represent the nation you're trying to represent and persuade.

>>3157225
>Implying this is the only example.
Robin Hood, Muslim women in his band.
Or maybe, nearly everything pushed on the mainstram media nowadays, fuckhead.

>>3157218

It would make a Roman, or a Roman-Briton mixed family the typical family among the elite part of society.

And most of those Romans would be natives of somewhere in the Med.

>>3157243
No it wouldn't.
Blacks weren't a majority in the Roman Empire.
You're literally delusional.

File: maxresdefault.jpg (180KB, 1920x1076px) Image search: [Google]

180KB, 1920x1076px

>>3157236
hahahahaahahahaahha, and whitewashed movies and history have NOT been mainstream all this time? is that what you're saying?

File: smug.jpg (95KB, 654x720px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 654x720px

>>3157231
>watching adverts
>2017
An ubermensch should be untroubled by such things. I bet you won't even make your first million before 30.

>>3157251
>Whitewashing justifes white genocide.
No it doesn't.
I never condoned that.

>>3157255
I stopped watching TV because of them.
So, nice try.

>>3157255
>I fast forward through commercials
>therefore I am legion

>>3157258
>a youtube video depicting a black soldier is white genocide
>implying i even mentioned white genocide in my post
>>>/pol/

>>3157269
Once more:
>Implying this is the only example.
Keep trying, Sven.

File: white-genocide-is-no-laughing-matter-our-way-of-life-10081729.png (89KB, 500x312px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 500x312px

>>3157269
ok, then, buddy. explain how white genocide is happening.

>>3157289
meant to reply to >>3157275

>>3157289
>White birth rate falls.
>Increase in practically free immigration from non-white countries.
>Constant virtue signalling and special proscriptions favouring non-whites.
>Whites told they're evil on TV, sometimes in an unobfuscated manner.
>Special freedoms given to non-whites, including preferential hiring.
>Population percentage of whites keeps going down and down.
Oooooh, I wonder how this ends...

>>3157308
>Whites told they're evil on TV, sometimes in an unobfuscated manner.
Meaning mainstream media.

>>3157308
none of these are true, though. post acutal evidence, not a greentext.

>>3157035
Dude they show black Ancient Britons.

The scariest thing about this is the rehabilitation of the image of the Roman Empire.

There was once a time when Boudicca, like the Anglo-Saxons and the Magna Carte, was considered a symbol of English liberty. Now historians celebrate a militarist and authoritarian empire because it brought diversity to Britain.

>>3157035
>It's a leftypol drasatically over-estimates the extent of Roman meritocracy and social mobility episode

I've just spent the last hour trying to plot out the fantastical family history and career path that would allow a West African man to rise to the rank of Legate or at a minimum Tribune in the Roman army and given up because it's so ridiculously implausible.

Well guys i think I've decided what my dissertation topic in my history major will be.

To what extent was the Roman Empire Black?

I'll report back in 3 fucking years with a definitive answer.

>>3157324
Actually its funny to see how much Boudica screws up and causes conflict in the minds of the left.

>BUT, STRONG WOMYN, FIGHTING, = GOOD, BUT DIVERSE EMPIRE, = GOOD, WHAT

>>3157314
as always, the racist comes up with nothing when asked for actual sources.

>>3157314
Fertility rate by country:
>https://www.indexmundi.com/g/r.aspx?v=25
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_sovereign_states_and_dependencies_by_total_fertility_rate
Racial fertility rate:
>http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2012/05/17/explaining-why-minority-births-now-outnumber-white-births/
>https://hailtoyou.wordpress.com/2015/12/21/total-fertility-rates-by-race-in-the-usa-1980-2013/
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Total_fertility_rate
Immigration rate:
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_net_migration_rate
>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3849646/Mature-years-fears-real-age-child-migrants-arriving-Calais.html
Antiwhite:
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bv25bPGoxw4
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7mqfmZS5xM
>https://www.youtube.com/v/PAm72W-_Lq0

>>3157342
Get fucked.
I found these after a few minutes of Googling, I could find much more and much worse if I tried hard.

>>3157327
We await with bated breath.

>>3157269
>a black soldier
That's not a soldier, that's someone who appears to be in command of a Roman legion, presumably a Legate or a Tribune.

You literally could not get there unless you have attained the rank of an Equestrian, which is something you gain by being rich not by meritocracy.

File: 1500677125247.jpg (8KB, 256x256px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 256x256px

Why are they so interested in meme Roman Britain all of a sudden?

>>3157035
How aboit you take a look at tve post below yours for a greater insight into this maliciousness, villain. Making up charachters for the sake of inclusion is an arbitrary means to a dark end.

>>3157327
>goes on 4chan to find stupid ass thesis topic
I await your languishing in the academic job market with your PhD from University of Phoenix

>>3157370
I've been on 4chan for over 10 years. I'm at the second best UK uni for history.
I was originally going to write about why everyone hates the Jews so much.

>>3157314
>>3157342
Real footage:
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZV315xqbRK8
What they want to you believe:
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lxbdvo2vFwc

>>3157376
Rabbi Yosef Tzvi ben Porat explains Why Hitler hated the Jews:
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XtbHEMODKwE

>>3156868
3 seconds in google
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2851777/Teacher-banned-using-word-banter-class-excuse-bullying-leaves-job.html

File: CAPTCHA_2.png (38KB, 317x278px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 317x278px

>>3157415
He sounds like such a fun person.

File: uvUsX2W.gif (26KB, 262x300px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 262x300px

>>3157070
>the youth are turning to the right

If you call populist clowns like Trump and Le Pen "right", maybe. Those were always popular, going for the lowest common denominator, that being in our era le ebin memes.

If you are referring to the classical meaning of right wing politics, you must be dreaming. No one in youth today would gave up global information in their smartphones for censorship and nationalism. Same way that except for some inexpressive fedoras, no one is really interested in traditionalism, religion and military ideals anymore.

File: 1500577759915.png (283KB, 546x470px) Image search: [Google]

283KB, 546x470px

>>3157369
>OH NO, BLACK PEOPLE
>HOW VILE!

>>3157465
It is when they're teaching history, which should be historically accurate.
Seriously, leave /his/tory, you don't belong here.

>>3156868
>Someone was so mad about a literally who on twitter disagreeing with the video they wrote a whole article about it

>>3157481
Several articles and one on the "historians" website:
>http://mike-stuchbery.org/index.php/2017/07/27/a-response-to-prisonplanet/

File: 1372617692633.png (506KB, 1192x953px) Image search: [Google]

506KB, 1192x953px

>>3157475
People on the thread showed already that black people on Rome was not only possible but part of several historical accounts, but your /pol/ple still moving the goal post every time

If it does not fit your SSA autistic classification, the world could not care less. We are in 2017 and being a "Negroid" does not mean a thing anymore.

You are the one ignoring history, calling modern views on old subjects (race) nothing but bias or politically agenda, forgetting that in all history it was always the case.

>classifying people by the nose is the way to go, not the DNA, you evil lefties!

File: worried.png (133KB, 1200x1397px) Image search: [Google]

133KB, 1200x1397px

>>3157534
No, look at the OP.
>typical family
That's been the whole argument, by the OP (me) throughout the entire thread.
It isn't representative of a TYPICAL family in Roman Britain.
So no, you're the one ignoring and twisting history.
Get your facts straight before you face me.

>>3157534
Oh and DNA is displayed by your phenotype.
Maybe stick to history, biology clearly isn't your forte.

>>3156868
Pure historical revisionist garbage from the BBC. This doesn't change the fact that Paul Joseph Watson is a whiny faggot.

>>3157555
Agreed.

>>3157534
>there are some blacks existing in the Roman Empire
>that means that the typical family in Roman BRITON was black

This kind of shit is entirely pushed by liberals (in a broad sense, capitalists), people on the traditional right, and the left (discounting anarcho-retards) would be completely against this pointless pandering.

If you really wanted to depict blacks in media to make your market size/viewship increase how about you teach about their history instead of shoehorning them into history that isn't theirs.

Do a BBC short about the Ethiopia, Mali, Nubia, Luba, Zulu, Kush, etc.

Why are liberals so lazy they can't even politically pander to their viewership in a tasteful manner.

File: YangzhouKatarinaVilioniTomb1342.jpg (454KB, 1102x1412px) Image search: [Google]

454KB, 1102x1412px

>>3157534
>People on the thread showed already that black people on Rome was not only possible but part of several historical accounts
Not once has anyone done this.

>b-but muh meme wealthy North African woman
Is not justification for a West African man commanding a Roman legion anymore than this14th century Italian gravestone is justification to claim that there were Swedish generals serving in China.

>>3157561
>>3157562
This.

>>3157557
Not to get into /pol/ territory here but, Islam is a religion. Its full of crazies and savages but there are plenty of chill muzzies such as the alawites and Shias, etc. And its fine if people want to criticize Islam that's fine. But Paul just will not shut the fuck up about Islam.

But still I have to agree with PJW that this is BBC rubbish.

>>3157562
and to be clear, what I mean by Italian gravestone is this gravestone of a presumably wealthy Italian woman that died in 14th century China and was rediscovered in Yangzhou in the 1950s.

>>3157568
The thing that annoys me the most about Paul, is the 'acting' he does and that faux-aggressive tone he uses when 'ripping' into people.
It just makes him sound really working class, in the unflattering stereotypical way

>>3157579
I didn't realize that he was 'acting', I thought he was that monotone in real life. He's just like Sargon in a way.

>>3156943
I think it helps to consider Multiculturalism as an Orwellian doublespeak term for Imperialism. In that it distorts/disguises the "sameness" of living under (for example) certain unquestionable economic, political, and social rules by masquerading as a celebration of difference in essentially frivolous domains (food, clothing, dance, etc).

But Empires are genuinely made up of many different cultures and peoples. So the routine lip service to multiculturalism can also be understood as a kind of maintenance of the overall social fabric of an imperial structure in spite of the different/competing peoples and cultures within.

It is definitely this >>3156952 as well. It's about giving everyone a "stake" in the host country and keeping order. Because you can be sure that a witch hunt against groups within societies are going to cause a lot of problems if hatreds ossify (see: muslims in recent times, but many other groups historically).

>>3157586
I suppose it could be his natural cadence.

>>3157597
I have a feeling we're seeing a move away from liberal ideals.

>>3157063
Liberals are the real racists, news at eleven.

>>3157597
I also recall reading about tactics used by the British Empire. If they wanted to control some particular asset (e.g. a strategic port or town) but were facing resistance from the native peoples, they would from time to time dump foreign people from the colonies (of various different ethnic groups) in that location.

The effect was to create dependence on the British Empire for security, by generating tension and distrust between the native and foreign ethnic groups.

So in that sense, one of the best ways to destroy resistance is perhaps not to fight it and conquer it "head on" (and create hostility toward you as an "invader") but to "grow" or "change" your target until it is completely different and easier to manipulate.

The same general thing could be said of sacred texts. When other texts came into mass production during the industrial revolution, sacred texts gradually lost their sanctity via the growth of text in general.

So there's a tactic for you if you want to destroy something. Don't bother fighting it. Instead, just grow it into something unrecognizable, grow it until it is lost in a sea of other choices.

>>3157618
Well I'm on the same boat as you that he's annoying and his whole "altright" shit is just plain trendy bullshit for people like Paul. The real hardcore /pol/fags think of Paul with contempt because Paul isn't a Neo-Nazi.

>>3157627
It sounds to me like 'decolonisation' is just colonisation in reverse.

>>3157629
I think the "alt-right" is nothing more than a contradiction in terms and an erosion of political discourse.

>>3156892
>We really do.
We really don't. /his/ is not for your juvenile crusades.

>>3157648
>Promoting historical realism is childish.
The utter state of /his/, according to you.
Sad times.
Or maybe, considering the thread consensus, you're alone in this.

>>3157308
>that's white peoples choice.
>that's just cheaper labor not really to do with race
>???
>whites are also always the protagonists on TV.
>whites are also more likely to be hired, it depends on the job. And the only reason they'd prefer a nonwhite would be to fill a quota and not seem discriminatory which is not fair to the nonwhite either since tthey are just viewed as tokens.
>again white peoples choices.

What I'm getting is that white people made this system the way it is, and made these decisions themselves. Or do you deny white peoples agencies? Take some responsibility and stop pretending to be victimized to build some heroic narrative.

>>3157661 see >>3157356 and >>3157381.
I don't remember making any democratic decisions for flooding European countries with refugees, or passing specialised 'hate speech' laws for Islam, but you're free to criticise other Abrahamic sects.
Mhm, funny that.

>>3157661
>What is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affirmative_action?

>>3157666
Blame your leaders then who are white and who you people elected into power. Stop shifting the blame and grow up.

is this sort of historical revisionism, cultural genocide?

>>3157677
Who do you think I was blaming, manchild?
I blame our leaders.

>>3157679
Exactly.

>>3157681
Why would "white" leaders conspire to actually genocide their own, "white race"? You want to see a real genocide? Take a look at Guatemala in the 80s. You're acting like a baby who wants to play the victim instead of helping yourself. I'm telling you this for your own good. Maybe you'll mature one day, but until then I'll pray for you.

>>3157699
>What are classes?
Take a look at >>3157627.

>>3157699
>Why would "white" leaders conspire to actually genocide their own, "white race"?

Asking "why" doesn't make it go away.
X is happening.
X is being enacted by our leaders.
X is destructive to traditional conceptions of European identity.
You may irrationally object to calling X genocide but that doesn't invalidate the reality of X.

>You're acting like a baby who wants to play the victim instead of helping yourself.
What does this mean in the context of X?

>>3157035
>>3156997
>/leftypol/ shitter in charge of history

This is why your movement is dying, people can see right thru your LIES.

File: 1278557084297.jpg (38KB, 562x437px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 562x437px

>le white genocide meme
>le pure white briton meme
>le pure white Yurope meme
>2017

BBC is doing God's work, that much is clear.

File: 1492316539947.png (542KB, 594x580px) Image search: [Google]

542KB, 594x580px

>>3157715
>lying about history is OK when we do it, take THAT racist misogynist CIS scum!

>>3157715
>le white genocide meme
See: >>3157356 and >>3157381.
>le pure white briton meme
>Admits that were was a small African population, due to Rome. But that it wasn't significant enough to be called 'typical'.
BTFO again.
>le pure white Yurope meme
How is that a meme?
>2017
Current year.
Hello, Trudeau.

>>3157721
What struggle? Geez and they say that I need to lose some weight at least I don't hold up a sign drinking Coke and talking about a struggle. The only struggle I can see is her losing weight or at least trying to lose weight.

>>3157732
>What struggle?
Getting up the stairs.

>>3157732

The struggle of LITERALLY geting PTSD over le evil racist opinions posted on a mandarin woodcarving forum.

File: mmmmfuhrer.jpg (163KB, 700x609px) Image search: [Google]

163KB, 700x609px

>>3157721
>my lies, in another hand, must keep centuries strong!

Not anymore, Mein Fuhrer. You concept of pure race is dated and busted for a long time by now. People are telling that on public schools and you are triggered by it. Does not change that every major scientific discovery of anthropology, sociology, archaeology and biology are in sync with those (not-so-new) views on race. Naming it DA JOOS CONSPIRACY does no make it any less true.

>>3157722
All the babbling about WHITE PEOPLE GENOCIDE NOW revolves around the concept of gene pool as a cup of milk, that in contact with 1% of cocoa will suddenly turn into chocolate milk to the point of no return
Needless to say that concept was already silly in 1940, and even more so after the Genome Project mapping.

>>3157030


PJW Wrecked that guys shit tho.

>>3157130
>the Second and Third Centuries AD were a time of general prosperity and the population of Roman Britain reached about 3.5 million by 400 AD.
>its estimated at most 117,000 legionares and Roman beaurocrats were used on occupying Britain
>a majority of those would have come from Italy, or other "white" parts of Europe
>of the few auxillaries drawn from the African provinces very few would have been sub-saharan black as depicted by the BBC


And yet the BBC said the black family was a TYPICAL family to be found in Roman Britian.

Fuck off back to /leftypol/ with your delusions.
You are as bad as /pol/ with shitting up this board.

>>3157699
Liberals are among the dumbest, hopelessly brainwashed and naive people on the planet. It's gonna be a hell of a wake up call when they aren't in the majority anymore and realise it's literally only white people (ignoring Eastern Europe) who give a fuck about racism.
I mean, the behaviour of Muslims is already fucking with their constructed reality, so they bawl and scream racist, or tell us it's our fault for not being accepting enough.
They are pure gutter scum and I hate them.

>>3157767
>Not addressing reality.
Disregarded.
I post facts, you post strawmen backed up with nothingness.

>>3157711
That's assuming it's happening. What is being enacted? What european identity? The continent is pretty big to lump into one monolith. And what do you mean by traditional conceptions of identity? It's not irrational, if you're calling elites flooding in cheap labor and whites chosing to have less kids a genocide then you are exaggerating and being melodramatic not to mention risk cheapening he word and turning it into a buzzword. What does it have to do ? Only babies with infantile views would subscribe to such a out of touch mentality.

>>3157777 see >>3157356 and >>3157381.
Go on, now try and push your denialism.

File: trigglypuff tantrum.gif (738KB, 202x244px) Image search: [Google]

738KB, 202x244px

>>3157767
>GENETICS AND BIOLOGY ARE RACIST CONSTRUCTS OF THE GAMERGATE CISARCHY!

>>3157770
>>3157771
This.

File: 1291673822366.jpg (12KB, 215x211px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 215x211px

>>3157774
>Genome Project does not count as source against my theory on pure race

Let me guess, evil joos did it?

>>3157786
I'm not talking about purity, you fucking moron.
A few drops is nothing, agreed.
But a drastic change in genetic majority and culture, from the objectively better, to the objectively worse, isn't okay.
It might be for you, because then you can virtue signal some more, but it isn't for sane Europeans.

>>3157771
It sounds like you need a hug.

>>3157767
>DA JOOS CONSPIRACY
I don't blame the Jews. They're the canary in the coal mine and they're already leaving Europe in droves.
No, it's the brainwashed liberal cultist who believe diversity is a good thing, Islam is a religion of peace and multiculturalism hasn't been a miserable failure. It's not a concerted effort, just the result of this self-destructive ideology and their useful idiot supporters working to fuck it up.
Jews are the ones being hardest hit (right now) by these collective delusions.

>>3157791
I'm butthurt rn, I won't deny it.

File: 1489806132830.jpg (152KB, 700x775px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 700x775px

>>3157792
>not blaming the jews who keep poisoning the well of science

>>3157796
Femanon here I'll hug you.

>>3157783
On contrary, genetics proved that SSA divisions were bullshit for once, something highly speculated a long time ago

Every time, however, scientists bring this fairly obvious fact, retards like you go on for the WE WUZZZZ tantrum, disregarding everything is being said in the researches. Cherry picking "My favorite 102% truth sources" as the only valid ones, mostly being from 140 to 1970. When I say SSA has been debunked several times I really mean it.
From every modern standing point (sociology, anthropology, biology, etc) it's nothing but a crackpot .

>>3157810
>Genetic difference between race.
>Some races are obviously more advanced than others.
Yeaaaah bro, totally crackpot, maaaaaaan.
*Smokes the dooby*

>>3157777
>What european identity?
That statement in itself is an example of X in action.

Honestly I'm afraid there's no point even discussing that
If a huge media outlet can publish that with no repercussions there is no backstepping

I don't give a shit about /pol/ but it just saddens me to see blatant history rewritting.

if you want to promote sub-saharan blacks (why not?) by using history (why not?), then talk about sub saharan africa. About Mali, about Songhai, about the kingdoms built on slavery (woops, too racist), about the Kongo struggling to stay in one piece after the portuguese came by (it's accurate and DOES fit the narrative of colonialism being bad if you spin it well), about the indian ocean trade in east africa, about whatever.

We have less documentation about sub saharan African history than we'd like to have, but we have enough.

>>3157791
It sounds to me like he needs a gun.

>>3157821
This.

>>3157821
>If a huge media outlet can publish that with no repercussions there is no backstepping
Back-stepping is ALWAYS an option if you have the nerve to actually do it.

>>3157761
And trying to lose weight as well. Unless trying to lose weight is now a racist social construct by the cisgender scum.

>>3157789
My point is the "drastic change" happened way too many time to count, and the world did not imploded because of it. Or do you think the "typical american" from 1776, 1849 and 2017 are exactly the same?

Some tards can argue that for this day they are truly 201% Anglo pure-breed, while a simple DNA scan can prove them wrong, that's why I mentioned Genome as the nail in the coffin for pure-race butthurt

Pretending there's a HABBEDING, or calling a MAJOR GENOCIDE is ridiculous, and is (more or less) nothing but supremacist bullshit . In times of war (ISIS and the immigrant crisis), expecting every country on the area to look, sound and behave as the same is just foolish

We are in a /his/ board, you should know better. World is changing and so are the countries, going for "MY PURE RACE" is the obvious agenda, not the inverse.

>>3157815

This. Also:
>significant genetic differences uncovered, like the warrior gene
>still being a shitlib who believes in the magic fairy of equality

We are like omg, one race the human race! *rips boong*

>>3157806
C-can I have a hug

File: 1442054355249.jpg (88KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 800x600px

>>3157815
>>3157838
dope strawman, bro

you sure told me

>>3157837
>My point is the "drastic change" happened way too many time to count, and the world did not imploded because of it.
lol
Tell that to the Romans.

>>3157831
I'd rather goose-step desu

>>3157842
You have lot of nerve to complain about strawmen Mr. "muh pure race".

File: 1488783662832.jpg (106KB, 649x366px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 649x366px

>>3157842
>gets utterly BTFO by facts and logic
>"I-I-I'm not owned!"

Sasuga, /leftypoz/!

>>3157846
That's the spirit.

>>3157837
Oh yeah, sorry, I forgot the other times in history when the world was as advanced as it is now.
Lucky they didn't use the nuclear weapons back then, eh? calle BUILDING

>>3157842
>Uses strawmen
>Complains about strawmen
Projecting?
Hypocrisy?
Both?

>>3157840
Sure *hug*

>>3157858
T-thanks

File: 1347578080792.png (55KB, 233x229px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 233x229px

>>3157849
>le lefty libtard weedman XdD
>facts
>samefagging

I have a smug /a/nime girl too, /pal/

>>3157862
You have yet to bring a relevant fact to the discussion Mr. "Muh Pure Race".

File: 1495560390793.jpg (376KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

376KB, 1280x720px

>>3157862
>spout arguments that a lefty REDDIT weedman would make
>get mad about getting called one

>>3157837
>let me just rewrite history of an area that didn't experience major population migrations until the 5th century (those coming from modern day Germany) because world's a-changing!
>let's play pretend that a TYPICAL BRITON FAMILY had a blackest nig legate as the head of the household even though Italian, Greek and other Mediterranean peoples, from which the peacekeeping legions were recruited, were not black, only because world is changing!

>>3157866
This.

>>3157842
>Everything I say is right
Yeah, and rejecting every accusations and "blackwash" every mistakes they made. That's basically the common mentality of libercucks and their accomplices nowadays.

Pretty accurate.

File: JuliusCaesar2012Posterig.jpg (104KB, 375x600px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 375x600px

>>3156868
THEY CAN'T KEEP GETTING AWAY WITH IT

>>3158092
What the fuck...

>>3158092
>>3158138
It's fine because its a stage play, in plays, men play women, women play men, adults play children, and blacks play whites, it doesnt matter and never has on stage.

But in a video meant to be educational it's just pure propaganda.

>>3158154
Certainly when aimed at children.

I highly doubt Bantus served in the Roman army. North Africans and perhaps a few afro-Asiatics yes. But not Bantus which is what most black English are and it looks ridiculous.

>>3158164
I'd actually be confident saying that a bantu african 100% never served in the Roman legions, and perhaps only a handful in the auxilia, and only in asia or africa.

File: 1463452413314.jpg (89KB, 700x700px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 700x700px

>>3157196
HAHAHA, they aren't teaching anyone history anymore in the US and many adults don't know shit thanks to the propaganda taught to parents or the common theme of people being "Well they are just dead people, who cares." These dumbasses will believe this shit and drives me insane. Especially if they wanted to help endorse black people, just talk about jazz/rock and roll/ zulu/ and bbq.

>lol who cares about historical accuracy /pol/ boogeymen btfo xD

>>3157543

>it's a typical romantic family

Is it? They're clearly very wealthy.

>>3158212
listen, I'm sick of you stormfags thinking you can just come in here and revision history as you see fit
also the inclusion of other peoples in our society is a vital task that we must encourage if they are to every assimilate fully and help run our societies

File: 1497767717653.png (345KB, 439x498px) Image search: [Google]

345KB, 439x498px

>>3158212
>These people will allow the west and it's values to die just because it makes people they don't like angry

>>3156868
He's not a historian ffs, he has a BA in History and English Literature and is a primary school teacher by trade.

>>3157092
Why don't they brag about mansa munsa instead of claiming they were Romans, Celts and Egyptians?

>>3158286
American public education doesn't teach West African history.

MODS PLS DELETE THIS BELONGS ON /pol/

File: 1494477656177.png (7KB, 112x112px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 112x112px

>>3158295
>Legit discussion of a historical political with some shit flinging
Stay mad bitch boy, maybe a literal hugbox is more to your taste.

>>3158307
*population, not politcal

File: 1497861983158.jpg (39KB, 720x575px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 720x575px

>>3157039
>BLACKsmith

https://youtu.be/Uxs7k5DtnYw?t=775
>complain about afrocentrist revisionism
>promote nordicist revisionism

>>3157205
You will never have children

File: 1501308108730.jpg (68KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 960x960px

Who gives a fuck u shit lords like how does this effect ur daily life in the slightest? Fuck they can say napoleon was a black dude for all I care. Truth is 90 percent of people dont give a fuck. To be honest its entertaining to see this sort of thing

>>3159015
Why are you on a history board if you are annoyed that people care about history?

>>3157415
>dailymail

>>3159015
This, it's fun watching stormweenies lose their shit over this, top level trolling

>>3159015
You must be one of those /b/tards who wander here occasionally to shitpost once in a thread before leaving forever.

>>3158092
Eddie George is based, I love the genderbends and shit like it in stageplays

>>3156943
>This retroactive multiculturalism is insane

There's no such thing, 'multiculturalism' was always the case.

Take Great Britain in this case. For example, English took a while to oust Celtic languages in Britain, especially outside England. The Normans weren't a huge population element but they brought a new high culture that significantly influenced the UK (French was more important than English in some functions for a decent period) and so on.

And Celtic itself in Britain was intrusive in an area where other languages had already been spoken (there might have actually been an earlier Indo-European layer that itself was superimposed on a pre-Indo-European one) and that might have left substrata or even some living languages in the Iron Age that weren't well-attested. Pictish itself was uncertain in its classification but it's usually considered Celtic these days and even that language was eventually replaced by a different Celtic language.

It's actually the attempted monoculturalism of the nation-state that's a recent thing. And there's no need to confuse the existence of multiculturalism with different macro-'races' either.

Also this chimping out over some tan figures of uncertain racial affiliations is thoroughly retarded, especially when we have NON-CARTOON movies of WASPs playing ancient Egyptians and Jews. Of course other people complain in that case and it's just as stupid but a lot of those hypocrites stay silent in either case.

Also, untypical as they were, near easterners and north africans have been found in Britain, confirmed via direct DNA analysis and there's also something that pulls the English towards the southern part of the continent as opposed to the Welsh, Scots and Irish, whether that thing is Norman or Roman or whatever. So yes, Britain isn't exactly some genetically-sealed land either.

>>3159053
So there's no wrong in adding in white civil rights leaders?

What I don't understand, liberals are celebrating the fact that Roman Britain was ''ethnically diverse'' but are ignoring the fact they were an occupying force in a land not theirs

>>3159132
Also if you look at recent DNA evidence, you might be a bit shocked about how different populations in Europe lived next to each other for hundreds and even thousands of years. Their genetic differences weren't as big as say a Briton and a West African but they were still pretty big.

So you could argue that the past wasn't just multicultural but also multiracial (race = genetically distinct population).

>>3156868
It means that the long millennia of western civilization is falling

>>3159146
>Also if you look at recent DNA evidence, you might be a bit shocked about how different populations in Europe

They're different relative to one another but all very close when compared to a cluster of ethnicities from another continent. Look at Africa, has the most distinct ethnicities and languages in the world.

I wouldn't say that mass European settlement in Africa was justified simply for that fact though.

The weirdest thing about all of this is how some people say "Hadrian sent some Syrian soldiers to Britain". Have they ever seen a Syrian before? Take a map. Now look at Syria.

>>3156952
The next thing we're gonna hear is that Europeans are black too

>>3156966
It's because they are trying to assimilate into the country. Using their own culture in Europe doesn't work>>3156966

>>3159200
You misunderstood what I said. I wasn't talking about modern Europe. Europe from the Iron Age or so until today is a very tight genetic sluster indeed.

But Europe before that included populations that were very genetically distant to one another. Let's take an extreme example. In Chalcolithic Romania you had some people that were genetically almost like the Mesolithic population of Europe (outside the range of modern Europeans), some that were like the Neolithic population of Europe (genetically like Sardinians) and some that were like a mix of the first two and a third population that resembled modern North Russians the most.

That's as multiracial as you got in Europe before modern immigration. The pre-nationalist past is overall very multiethnic and even multiracial even if at various points in time people end up mixing with each other and homogenizing.

>>3156868
Stop posting this over and over again, every fucking day. Okay, we got it the first time. now please stop

This is great news. This means the english colonisation of africa wasnt racist, since the english were actually africans all along.

>>3158171
holy fuck I thought this Mercyful Fate album was just random colours didn't realise it was a skull before now

>>3157534
And the black celt, you pathetic cuck?

>>3159134
Wait till you're a minority.

>>3159132
>Also, untypical as they were, near easterners and north africans have been found in Britain,

Why do you nihilistic scum refuse to address this >>3157562 or >>3157360?

You ALWAYS pivot back to the North African talking point and never address the fact that character is not depicted as North Africa, and
you never address the fact that the character in question holds a rank that it is profoundly unlikely for a non-Roman to hold at that time.

It's like you're operating from a script.

>>3156943

Go back to POL you fucking retard

>>3156966

Because they don't want Indians in India

They want them in Europe

Why would they make movies about india

>>3156997

>Literally erasing our history/traditions/culture will annoy some people who said they disagreed with me on the internet
>Let's do it

>>3157030

Go back to pol

And take your paranoid delusions of grandeur with you, white boy

>>3157057

African "kingdoms"

A patch of dirt with some guy in charge may technically be a kingdom, but it isn't the same as the ones that matter

>>3157070

>Don't argue with Nazis or everyone will be a Nazi

Go back to fucking Pol you Nazi bitch

>>3159015
>t. libercuck degenerate
Then why are you here if you don't care about history and truth? You fucking ignorant, clueless faggot.

“Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.”
― George Orwell

>>3159707
/pol/tards sure love quoting socialists

>>3156868
It's so ironic this place also gave birth two of greatest dystopian fiction writers in the world. Almost everything they wrote in their novels become real in the end.

>>3159757
I'm posting in /his/ and you're replying in /his/ as well. Fucking moron.

What's the point in making this thread everyday? What is there to discuss?

See, the problem is that /pol/tards are like a sect trying to shove their beliefs down my throat. It's not that you aren't right about blacks in britain, it's that I don't give a fuck and you keep posting /pol/ threads in /his/, and your whole reason to post them is to further a retarded agenda unrelated to history. It's like jehovah's witnesses annoying me a saturday morning about a non-issue related to their sect, stop pestering me.

File: spurdo anglo-saxons.png (104KB, 1033x600px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 1033x600px

>>3156868
so another reason why the Anglo-Saxons are the masterace?

>>3159765
Which doesn't mean you aren't a /pol/tard.

>/leftypol/ isn't infesting this board
the amount of historical revisionism these people support is astounding
>muh /pol/ boogeyman hurr flurrrbllluurrppppfff
you have to go back

>>3159783
Then don't reply and hide this, bury your head in the sand, simple.

Everyone is anonymous here. You're the one who keep shouting /pol/.

>>3159792
You're the only who shouts /pol/. I did mention anything relates to /pol/ or their ideology.

>>3159818
*didn't

>>3159810
Yes, because you retards are sperging outside of /pol/ as always. And don't worry, I'm saging.

>>3159818
>t. libercuck degenerate
It truly is a mistery what board the person posting this may belong to.

>>3159823
Sorry, I don't go to /pol/. You're the one who keep labeling random anonymous posters who you don't even know if it's same person you're replying as /pol/. You sound more like a typical /pol/tard to me. Go back to /pol/, faggot.

>>3159853
Did you hit your head or something? In the original post you quoted I wasn't quoting anyone.

>>3159827
Oh, I didn't know "libercuck degenerate" is a title only belongs to /pol/? Looks like you visit their shitty board more than me, why don't you just stay there and don't come back.

>>3159783
>It's not that you aren't right about blacks in britain, it's that I don't give a fuck and you keep posting /pol/ threads in /his/,
If you don't care about history why are you browsing and posting on /his/?

File: 1271215906888.jpg (54KB, 350x392px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 350x392px

>>3159015
this

/pol/ getting assblasted, about black celtics in a literal Adobe flash cartoon is priceless

No one cares. In fact, mostly people don't give a shit about MUH GENES either, since a big part of the world now is nothing but WW2 immigrant mixing. Only some tards try to go on about how they still pure white roman blood those days. No one cares, really.

>>3159783
if historical accuracy is what passes for /pol/, consider that maybe /pol/ is /his/'s friend in this case
>/pol/ will never be my friend!
alright, then you can go sit with the commies at /leftypol/ who want historical revisionism

>>3159868
I have no idea wtf are you rambling about now, looks like you have nothing meaningful to say other than emotional insults. You're acting more like the /poltards you hate so much.

>>3159919
you see, the problem is not just that they happened to be black, but that someone had to purposefully create an altered depiction of the past because of modern political influences
this is not getting upset over nothing, they had to draw and produce this shit and you know damn well why they did it.
it was not passing mistake.

>>3159919
>It's a leftypol comes to /his/ and lectures people for caring about history episode.
Why don't you tell us more about how much you just don't care, Mr. Cool Dude.

File: 1432080890664.png (307KB, 403x403px) Image search: [Google]

307KB, 403x403px

>>3159884
>recursive fallacy

>>>/pol/

But if by a miracle you are not just another /pol/tard, be sure to follow the rule who says that pol/ shit belongs only there anyway. Which includes slurs, racism, misogyny and all other kinds of edge retardation that you used in your "arguments"

>>3159907
What history is there to discuss or is being discussed? I do care about history. I do not care about /pol/ spamming the same threads for days because they want to push the white genocide narrative.

>>3159945
"keep /pol/ in /pol/" refers to discussing politics there
it doesn't mean "stop being a racist bigot misogynist transphobe hrhrhrhfppppfffttt"
this is 4Chan, it happens fucking everywhere

>>3159946
>push the white genocide narrative.
is calling out historical inaccuracy "pushing the white genocide narrative"?

>>3159945
not your safespace, feminist cuck

>>>/leftypol/

File: 0lBXFeW.png (108KB, 400x381px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 400x381px

I'd be a lot more sympathetic to /leftypol/'s cries of /pol/ invasion if they knew when to fight their battles.
letting historical revisionism slide is not a good way to get the fence-sitters of a history board on your side

File: 1288911455556.jpg (6KB, 204x258px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 204x258px

>>3156868

>mfw leftist are actually defending this orwellian retardation

>>3159981
No no I think that day /leftypol/ spammed BLACKED probably brought some people over to their side.

>>3159945
This is not your personal safeplace and not only made to suit your own libercuk ideology, libercuck.

>>3159965
No, but I've been around enough time that I know this is the purpose of spamming this daily.
But you don't need to believe me, you can read the threads that pop up and you'll explicitly read /pol/tards whining about white genocide and liberal and joo conspiracies constantly.

>>3159945
Yeah, keep telling anyone you disagree back to /pol/. Looks like you really are obsessed with them.

>>3159994
so pick your battles you stupid pinkos

when the historical revisionism shows up say "yeah that's fucked" and when the political bias rears it's head go "yeah you're fucked"

you'd be loved on this board, but when these SJWs start defending the BBC's bullshit the centrists hate you.

>>3159992
prolly

File: 1490238188570.jpg (95KB, 600x540px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 600x540px

>>3159981

Its a good time to remind everyone that /leftypols/ mascot was a tranny furry communist, and then the board went into a civil war because they said it was sexist because people were fapping to this shitty cartoon character

>>3160013
>when the historical revisionism shows up say "yeah that's fucked" and when the political bias rears it's head go "yeah you're fucked"
I can post that the bbc is wrong and tell /pol/tards to stop their religious jihad at the same time. And I do. Although after days of spamming I only feel like telling them to fuck off already.

>>3160019
as much as i would like both /pol/ and /leftypol/ to fuck off, i find myself naturally siding with /pol/ because it's /leftypol/ that's fucking with history

isn't there some screenshot of some leftist subreddit talking about how they wanted to infiltrate /his/ floating around here?

>>3160029
>stop their religious jihad
is that "religious jihad" pointing out the BBC's bullshit?
if your concern is more about fighting /pol/ than defending history, you need to leave this board

>>3159932
Hollywood has being "artistic" about History for a long, long time and no one ever says a thing about it. People just accepts it's only a movie, with staff trying their best to get the empathy of the public, making historical figures looks more like their own kind. It happens since the Greek tragedies, to the Renascence, Baroque and again and again through the course of History, specially when it comes to visual arts and theater/opera . No one, however, flips out about how people got "brainwashed" to believe Jesus Christ was a Italian dude, or how Cleopatra was suspiciously European in the "Caesar & Cleopatra" play.
So why the double standards? The only difference here is black dudes, and that's seems to be the only reason people are flipping out ; "BLACK PEOPLE IN HISTORY REEEE".
Blowing out the retarded notion that black people (SSA or not) never did a thing but "bundle and sticks" seems to always trigger this kind of reception, but when asked why, people go back to the alibi about how they are "butchering" real history. Besides, of course, being nothing but a flash cartoon with black people on it, having no real repercussions in mind collective compared to other more famous ( and wrong) historical depictions.

But those are harmless as long it's white.

All in all, double standards, slippery slope and lots and lots of cherry picking

>>3160052
I already answered this, anon.

File: 1501258597510.jpg (154KB, 1440x1540px) Image search: [Google]

154KB, 1440x1540px

>>3157269
>>a youtube video depicting a black soldier is white genocide

I want you to explain to me how a fictional movie depicting ancient egyptians with white actors is a horrible crime and injustice while an educational video, meant for children ,depicting ancient britons as blacks and middle easterners is totally fine

>>3159958
>>3159975
>>3159993

>Discussions about politics and current events should be posted on /pol/. Global Rule #3 is in effect: blatantly racist posts may result in a ban.

inb4
>MUH BOARD CULTURE

File: 14712130498468416544.jpg (68KB, 500x465px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 500x465px

>>3160048
well /pol/ fucks with history in the form of holocaust denial, but the thing is, this is already a crackpot shit and no one really takes it seriously.

The BBC and powerful forces are actually forcing this multicultural revisionism, specifically to kids, which is what bothers me. I HATE the idea of someone fucking with history for the express purpose of shilling some modern political point. It makes me sick

>>3160062
>No one, however, flips out about how people got "brainwashed" to believe Jesus Christ was a Italian dude
False. Jesus has been depicted that way from Byzantine's earliest icons. You fell for a meme, depictions of him weren't never based on cesare.

>how Cleopatra was suspiciously European in the "Caesar & Cleopatra" play.
Cleopatra was ethnically macedonian which is European.

>>3160062
>or how Cleopatra was suspiciously European
wasn't she fucking Greek?

and when they start revising history, you get to get mad about it, as will i, and as will every fence-sitter on /his/

but don't defend the BBC's bullshit, and don't defend /leftypol/ defending the BBC's bullshit/

File: free shrugs.jpg (55KB, 447x604px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 447x604px

>>3156868
wouldn't all of this be a lot more permissible if there weren't black people?

legions being ethnically diverse is fairly legit, but only a tiny amount of their troops would have somehow come from sub-saharan africa

File: 1251203194537.jpg (9KB, 247x252px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 247x252px

>>3159981
>You are not TRIGGERED by a flash cartoon?
>You actually hates LE KEK meme?
>You are not a racist fuck and could care less about pure genes bullshit?

>YOU MUST BE A LEFTY!

>>3160062
This. When you have sources that are supposed to be good sources of information airing shit like Ancient Aliens, The Curse of Oak Island, and Pawn Stars, there's a lot more to worry about than actors and drawings. It's not that big a deal. If you actually want people to learn about history, pretty much the first thing you tell them is that movies and TV get a lot of things wrong and the past looked nothing like how media portrays it.

>>3160062
>or how Cleopatra was suspiciously European in the "Caesar & Cleopatra" play.

Cleopatra was european. Get the fuck off of /his/ right now you dumb piece of shit if you honestly dont know this and are shilling for multicultural revisionist history shit

>>3160067
>someone say something somewhere
>that proves my theory, everyone thinks the same!

Yes, and Alex Jones reflects the American common sense

>>3160116

>a reality tv show about a pawn shop exist, therefore, there is nothing wrong with brainwashing children with multicultural revisionist history!

its hilarious watching leftypol pathetically trying to defend this while also showing how little they know of history in the first place.

>>3160112
I'll make it simpler for you

>you don't like historical revisionism?
>fucking /pol/! racist get off my board

notice how i had to jump less far to describe what happening in this thread right now?
none of the fencesitters are happy with this, or with y'all.
you have to go back.

>>3160081
If you really can't stand with it, and you're the "minority" about it here. Maybe it's (you) should go, not others. Posting retarded greentext bubbling doesn't change that.

>>3160144

your response is a nonsensical emotional outburt and literally not an argument. You are so utterly clueless that you unironcially bitched about european cleopatra in a play to defend multicultural revisionism being used to brainwash children.

>>3160133
>post LE EVIL BLACK CARTOON all day
>If deleted, post again
>Finally gets responses
>People don't give a shit
>YOU MUST BE SHILLING!

Who's shilling here?. No one cares about " WHITE GENOCIDE NOW!MAKE IT STOP!" retardation. it's just a cartoon. Or else you prove to us how black Romans in cartoons are the seventh seal of Apocalypse, without committing any slippery slope, of course

Alternatively
>Asterix ruined Gaul history, France is finished!

File: 1422656975361.jpg (39KB, 348x333px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 348x333px

>Babbles all day about Holocaust never happening
>BBC IS A HISTORICAL REVISIONIST .IT'S LI-TE-RALLY 1984!

>>3160172

>WHO CARES?!
>continues to endlessly shill for it

wow, really made me think. Everyone on the history board hates it because its revisionist lies. You also exposed yourself as a retard who was actually bitching about european cleopatra because youre so clueless about history, making your opionon on this worthless since your political shilling is apparent. But please keep posting to showcase to everyone just how shitty /leftypol/ is.


notice how all you can do is strawman me in these childish emotional outburt?

>>3160192
>my historical revision is ok, because they do it too
anyone who is an actual /his/torian despises both, and you are part of the cancer killing this board

>>3160081
>Romans history revisionism
>"politics and current events"

Yeah, It's OK when libercucks do it and we can never talk about it nor oppose it, amiright?

File: commie shit.jpg (683KB, 2008x1338px) Image search: [Google]

683KB, 2008x1338px

>>3160192

no, youre both stupid faggots. fuck off with your revisionism

File: thumbs up kid.jpg (22KB, 398x500px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 398x500px

I am glad /leftypol/'s bullshit is getting called out, it means this board still has some hope

>>3160214

/thread

Just sage and report these shitty threads

>>3160214
somewhere along the line, it became /leftypol/'s colonization effort which encountered combined resistance from both /pol/ and regular /his/.
So you see /pol/ and /leftypol/ both playing the dumb political narrative game.

IMO I've found /leftypol/ to be more guilty of this than the other, but it's cancer on both ends.

>>3160192
Those who babbles all day about "Holocaust never happening" such as Neo Nazi or white supremacists usually don't have any real power and influences, they're nothing but a bunch of vocal minority edgelords.

MSM such as BBC, on the other hand, is completely different level.

>>3160226

>its a "leftypol desperately tries to defend revisionist history lies, gets called out, exposes themselves to the entire board as being stupid faggots, then claims the issue isnt important in the first place and just begs everyone to delete the threads in the hopes it washes away the utter humiliation they have just experienced" post

>>3160192
Are you forced to pay your taxes to the media who say the holocaust never happened?

>>3160245
Kys

This leftypol boogyman crap isn't real, get a life loser

>>3160192
But the holocaust as we know it never happened.

File: 1501351439950.png (115KB, 1281x562px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 1281x562px

>>3160288
>This leftypol boogyman crap isn't real, get a life loser

see

>>3160208

>>3160299
Yes it did, stop showing of to your internet friends

>>3160307
No, i dont want to see it. Kys

Is everyone being a massive faggot over the skin color of a bunch of cartoon characters in a very basic history video? Or is there more to it?

>>3160482
the BBC produced it

>>3160485
Yeah, no I get that bit. But is everyone flipping out over the skin color of a bunch of cartoon characters? Or is some of the stuff they say about typical Roman families also wrong?

>>3160490
Well typical Roman families weren't mulattoes from my knowledge and there weren't any blacks in Pictish tribes.

>>3156868
We wuz ROMANZ N SHIEEET

>>3160490
Typical Roman families were not black

>>3160216
We have to call out bothsides though, but yeah I will admit that /leftypol/ is getting tiresome. What happened to nuance?

>>3156868
THERE ARE THREE FUCKING THREADS ABOUT THIS IN THE CATALOGUE

PLEASE CONTAIN YOUR FUCKING AUTISM TO THIS THREAD AND STOP MAKING THREADS ABOUT THE SAME 5 MINUTE VIDEO

>>3160522
that's racist

>>3157130
Jesus christ. What a bunch of nonsense devoid of actual meaning or fact you just posted.

>Uhm accctschually roman soldiers were from all around the empire so uh roman britain was diverse and multicultural just like today!

Not really.

>>3160062
>People just accepts it's only a movie

This was aimed at kids, to educate them on history.

>>3156868
The Roman empire did extend into Egypt, and Egypt was already diverse. It makes sense this would be true but it's not the game changer some would imply.

File: 1500118137996.jpg (313KB, 819x566px) Image search: [Google]

313KB, 819x566px

>>3156868
ive been think about this and other writers who do this to history like Doctor Who writer Steven Moffat.

Their main argument is that they know its not true but by presenting it like this they can make a better more inclusive society or as Moffat states "we can bring it fourth".

so if a black kid from London calls them out and says that wasnt true and he came originally from African slaves ,Moffat and others who do this essantal response is "well i was hoping youd be too thick to know the truth.."

Their essentially banking and presuming that minoritys and the youth are thick and gullible.

Its like yeah i know its a lie but could you please have the curtsy to be less intelligent than me and as thick as your peers please, my minority friend.

>>3157073
Your ancestors played with their toys. There are no refunds in history.

>>3160311

Dude seriously where do I join the influence teams? I want to make bucks by shitposting as well, can you link me to a site or a discord group?

>>3157205
Homeschool

>>3160650

It's illegal in some cunts tho

Mine for example isn't illegal but they make it nearly impossible and is a very bureaucratic process.

>>3157561
Opposed to any new information aren't you? Blacks were not a commanding force in Rome. Your history is still intact. They're just shedding light on another aspect.

>>3159015
They need converts to further their cause.

>>3157534
I checked the sources quoted concerning the video, the first one ('Museum of London Report on the DNA Analyses of Four Roman Individuals – Supplementary Information'), and you'll excuse my pretty poor knowledge in biology, has one corpse whose haplotype has also been found in Germany and Denmark, one whose type has also been found in Russia Slovakia and Iran, one which has been found in "western europe", and the final one, H2a2a1 I couldn't decipher with a simple google search ( the source for the locations is eupedia.com, I hope that's reliable). The corpses are found in graves ranging between 50 AD-400AD at most, 70AD-300AD at the least

The other one ('Strontium and stable isotope evidence for diet and mobility in Roman Gloucester, UK’) simply concludes that 7 of the 21 people in the grave come from areas that are warmer than the British Isles.

I don't think anyone disputes that there was a significant influx of people from around the empire, but the genetic record seems pretty slim. There probably weren't a lot.

>>3159144
The land is always owned by the occupying force.

>>3160630
Fiction has no responsibility to truth.

>>3160655
Would I be correct if I guessed the bureaucratic process means sticking to their agenda?

>>3160906
but this is bbc teach...

>>3157621
Incidentally racists.

>>3157761
Mandarin wood carving forum? I wish!

>>3157858
Faith in humanity temporarily restored.

>>3158243
The video posits them as typical.
Read the bottom.