Were slow walk into MG fire tactics still used in the RU Civil War?

>>3148907
>Is this Korean portrayal of a battle in a movie historical accurate?
Really activates my almonds.

File: 376.png (135KB, 904x944px) Image search: [Google]

135KB, 904x944px

>>3148907
not at all

>>3148938
>Korean portayal
It's just Korean subs numbnuts. They're speaking Russian and it's made by Russians.

>>3148907
Nobody gave orders to walk slowly into MG fire, you idiot. That meme comes from ONE episode at the Somme where British forces following a creeping barrage were caught on the advance by MG nests which had not been adequately suppressed due to shortages of shells.

People in WW1 weren't suicidal and officers weren't clinically retarded. Even in the early battles they knew you had to advance *rapidly* into defensive fire, preferably masking your approach for as long as possible and hammering the defenders with direct fire, in order to arrive with enough mass to break the defense.

Still, in the Russian Civil War tactics were generally more fluid than on the Western Front. The Western Front 1914-18 is really a historical aberration which could only have happened there. Russia was too large and open to have unflankable trench works extending across the entire country, so maneuver warfare never died. Cavalry and armored trains were a HUGE part of the Russian Civil War because of this.

File: Screenshot (6).png (29KB, 281x449px)

29KB, 281x449px

>>3149201
Hi Ivan.

>>3149227
>white army
that explains everything
i bet all 30 dead are americans who didn't do shit
>>3148941