Wars, Revolts Linked to Solar Cycles

>>3132219
That's interesting, I want to look into this.

I can't find any source on this that doesn't sound like pure conjecture or apophenia. It doesn't really make any biological sense either. Some animals have sensitivity to the magnetic poles, but that's generally due to adaptations involving migration patterns. Magnetic variation could cause a detrimental effect in human mood, but blaming solar activity for all violent conflicts wrought by mankind is akin to astrology.

>>3132219
>1915
>wars are linked to the sun!
>biggest war in history already started a year ago

>>3133736
>source
Just gather sun activity data and compare it with human unrest dates, asking for sources is religion dogma lazy cuck tier

>>3133770
>Just do the work to disprove this outlandish claim that has no proof or source provided
Sure.

>>3133778
>when you are so lazy that you lie to yourself

File: can-you-really-get-rich-online.jpg (23KB, 500x300px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 500x300px

>>3132219
The good news is that we are already the past the 2014 solar peak, which was the weakest one ever recorded, and it has an average of 11 years long cycle

>>3133770
>you don't need a peer reviewed article, just infer trends using incomplete data!

Fuck off psuedo-intellectual.

>>3132219
So when is WW3 happening? I can't wait for the world to end.

>>3133900
Fuck off you dumb shit

>>3133925
you are the one getting triggered by a request for evidence so clearly you are the dumb shit

t. impartial neutral observer

so when is the next solar cycle?

>>3133957
I expect it to be around 2025, we don't have a model of solar cycles yet so we just average from history. There is one every decade, the last one came too early and too weak.