Suffrage

>>3120154
>false equivalence
>strawman
>loaded question

2/10

File: Screenshot_20170721-214333.jpg (103KB, 800x205px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 800x205px

>>3120179

3/10. Has elements of a decent argument, but it's constructed poorly.

Better to complain about the initial suffragists being upper-class white women who argued that their vote would help keep the poor and coloreds down, that British suffragettes engaged in domestic terrorism, and that suffragettes would go around and harass {in some cases, assault} every able-bodied man in Britain to go sign up for the army to the point where the government had to print special ID cards for people who worked in key factory positions.

File: what should have happened.png (1MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1280x720px

>>3120154

Well if that is true, then women's suffrage is this guys fault.

>>3120895
Tell me more about British suffragettes. This sounds like an interesting topic.