Why did the Nationalists lose and under what conditions could the Nationalists have won the Chinese Civil War?
>>3105774
1) The nationalists were more damaged by WWII than the communists were.
2) After Stalin overran then-Japanese Manchuria, he gave it to Mao and the Communists for them to use.
Had they won, China would be a first world country today.
>>3105774
US backstabbing and communist insurgents within the department of state.
Nationalist China was fucked, even before the war it was full of competing assholes and business interests only looking out for themselves. to the extent people starved because the government officials stole it to sell the grain to other peasants. Then there was the fact Chiang enlisted Japanese soldiers for at least 2 years after the war ended, which did wonders for his popularity among the peasantry. It made the unknown quantity of Mao very attractive compared to what they had
>>3105783
Had the nationalists won, China would be an overpopulated shithole a-la Bangladesh rather than a world leader in technology. The communists were bad, but theres a reason the KMT was less popular. The KMT was corrupt as hell, and under them China was a South-America tier dictatorship + warlords.
>>3105810
So the only way that the nationalists could have had the chance of winning would have been foreign involvement, i.e. the US or UK deploying boots on the ground?
>>3105853
That's probably even worse, all the Communists would have to do is bring up all the times foreign armies have fucked China up in the past. The only way they could have won is if Sun Yat-Sen never died
>>3105814
Nationalists fled to Taiwan and made it a modern industrial powerhouse. All of China would have been like this and ruled the world.
>>3105906
>implying
>>3105906
Modern China is what Chong Gaishek wanted to achieve with painting of Mao instead of him on the wall.