How would Kurdish rule be bad for the Middle East?
>(F)ersians proved to be too cucked to rule anything
>Arabs couldn't rule more than 300 years before shitting the bed and fall out of relevance and this was after 3 different civil wars
>Turks had constant rebellions and infighting while getting shit on by Russians and the Habsburg meme
Kurds are more secular and democratic than any of the other inferior races and tribes currently making up the Middle East. And they have proven to work well together with the West while respecting all minorities of their vast nation.
I believe the time has come for a Kurdish ruled Middle East to combat the degeneracy of Arabs and (F)ersians. And to rule over Islam like the Prophet envisioned while having a stable relation with Israel.
>>3105116
Kurds are basically all that is bad about arabs, turks and iranians mixed in a single mongrel nation. How the fuck are they supposed to rule anything?
>>3105116
Kurds are Persians, they're just bumpkin / yokel Persian mountainmen.
>>3105175
>Kurds
>(F)ersians
nice try Alireza, but Kurds are actually proud of their Iranian heirtage unlike those filthy Arabs in disguise
>>3105116
If all those groups are so bad why do you think the kurds who never managed to get country going would be better?
>>3105175
This, kurds are basically just feral persians. Kurd is not even an actual ethnic name, just a sasanian buzzword for all iranic tribal shits.
>>3105116
The only secular democratic kurds are in Syria
>vote for independence in about 2 months
soon
>>3105116
That's Armenian, Assyrian and Persian land, sweetie
>>3105904
umm no, sweetie