How would the current Century be described later on in history?
>>3099820
>The 21st century is a decade and a half in so far.
>"How would the current Century be described later on in history?"
>>3099828
up until now of course
>>3099849
>9/11
>war in the Middle East
>2008 recession
>refugee crisis
>rising right
That's how it would be described. A better description would be "a lot a Muslims are about to Jews 2.0"
>>3099820
The time when people finally realised the dangers of climate change but were too greedy to do anything against it
>>3099820
"the age of pissing about"
t. Karl Pilkington
>>3099828
The century is like 17.6% over mate.
>>3101217
kek
>>3099820
So far I think this century is about 1) reaping the consequences of interventionist foreign policy (active terrorist cells, refugee crises, even a degree of political instability at home) and 2) the degradation of personal liberties in the West thanks to no longer having to prove ourselves superior to the Soviet Union (TSA, mass surveillance, internet censorship, decline of wages, wiping out of middle class, etc.).
>>3099828
Bad things:
>dot-com crash, enron, 2001 recession
>9/11, war on terror
>dumbass war in Iraq
>other sporadic terrorist attacks throughout Europe and America (London, Madrid)
>giant 2008 recession
>ISIS
>political polarization
>seeming dramatic uptick in terrorism, Paris in particular comes to mind
>global warming
>Obama gutting NASA
Good things:
>amazing advances in medicine (particularly cancer drugs)
>invention of very small computers (smartphones, tablets, etc.)
>self-driving vehicles
>3-d printing
>absolute poverty ($1 a day kinda shit) nearly eradicated
>dank memes
>>3099820
"Brave New World" in reality.
Less than two decades in 21st century and we already got legalization of drug abused, fag marriage, rampant lgbt propaganda and promiscuity, demoralize family institutes and religions, and genome editing. What do you think what's going to happen? I presume Huxley will be very "happy" to see the fictions in his novel become real...
>>3099820
>And though one be right in saying of a sluggard that he is "killing time" yet in respect of an age that rests its salvation on public opinion,—that is, on private laziness,—one must be quite determined that such a time shall be "killed," once and for all: I mean that it shall be blotted from life's true History of Liberty. Later generations will be greatly disgusted, when they come to treat the movements of a period in which no living men ruled, but shadow-men on the screen of public opinion; and to some far posterity our age may well be the darkest chapter of history, the most unknown because the least human. I have walked through the new streets of our cities, and thought how of all the dreadful houses that these gentlemen with their public opinion have built for themselves, not a stone will remain in a hundred years, and that the opinions of these busy masons may well have fallen with them. But how full of hope should they all be who feel that they are no citizens of this age! If they were, they would have to help on the work of "killing their time," and of perishing with it,—when they wish rather to quicken the time to life, and in that life themselves to live.