Have two countries been more bitter rivals?
Why couldn't they just get along?
>>3097487
They stole our land and rejected our claim to their throne.
>Oui oui, get off muh land.
>Doesn't get off land for 300 years
>>3097514
It wasn't "their" land. We had a claim to it and their throne.
But this doesn't explain the rivalry after the hundred years war
>>3097526
Perhaps they were >tfw too intelligent
to be friends
Daily reminder that Napoleon was the first Hitler.
Frogs are barely better than Jerry.
>>3097553
I like your channel
>>3097487
They would never have been able to fully hold the other save for a short period in the early 1200's. Even then, the two were making the smartest plays by farming each other for XP. By the Renaissance and Age of Sail, it was over for the rest of their competitors.
>>3097487
>Have two countries been more bitter rivals?
Of course however France and the UK are special in that neither one ever vanquished the other.
>>3097487
Now they are both being taken over by niggers and muslims.
Why would they get along? France was the reigning military and cultural power on the continent for a long time, and was the only one who could really threaten or challenge English domination of the seas or colonies. Napoleon conquering continental Europe was much more dangerous to England than the Spanish Armada
>>3099411
US is not the UK's "oldest son"
Bermuda and Canada are older, and that's just outside of Europe.
>>3097490
This. But it's important to remember such petty sectarian matters are beneath us now. We serve a high purpose as Anglo-Americans.
China and Mongolia.
>>3099558
Not every steppeshit that threatened China was a Mongol.
Sweden and Denmark
>>3097487
Denmark-Sweden was just as bitter desu
If those fucking Bulgar savages would have just stopped their dick wanging the result wouldn't be this. I blame them for the fall of Constantinople.
>>3100183
>result: ottoman rule on the Balkans
My fucking sides