Why do Indo-Aryans have more cold adapted noses than western Europeans?
Is it more of a low humidity adaptation? Western Europeans seem to consistently have a very wide nasal bridge, which is more hot/humidity adapted.
>>3091362
Very, very odd choice of marketing my friend.
>>3091370
lolwut
>posts a pic of a recent movie somewhat related to the topic
>must be marketing
>>3091370
The guy could perfectly be a Southern Italian/Sicilian
>>3091497
not nigger enough
>>3091362
Europe is very humid.
The main factor in nose shape is air contact, for moisturizing the air. Air temperature is of little consequence (though oxygen concentration, dependent on temperature, may be)
a thin nasal bridge moisturizes air very efficiently. This is consistent with the Indo-Aryan origins postulated to be in dry places like Central Asia, Siberia, Iran, etc.
a wide nasal bridge is poor at moisturizing air, and only survives in a wet climate.
>>3091497
For a southern Italian to be that brown they'd have to have a sun-tan, that is not a suntan. Although anyone can have babyface like that, Indians/Pakis etc are more likely to look like that
>>3092098
It's pretty common in eastern Europeans too.
Again, r1a
>>3091362
It's more acclimated to dry climates and evolved probably in Mesoptamia or An*tolia, and then dominated Iran and spread to India.
There is no difference between Semitic nose you see in Yemen and Oman and Iranian as well as Indian hook noses.
Prove me wrong.
You can't
>>3092595
Also Tajiks and Ossetians don't have Semitic noses, their noses look more East Asian than Semitic.
Look it up. Indians and Iranians are more similar to each other than any of those to Ossetians or Tajiks
>>3091362
Because the himalayas maybe?