How much of their success is owed to Motown?

>>3090279
All of it. They're literally just 1960's wiggers.

The Beatles bought a few Motown tunes when it was a small company and got solid hits. Both benefited.

File: adorno.jpg (33KB, 625x390px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 625x390px

This man wrote 2/3 of the Beatles' songs, George Martin (the fifth Beatle) wrote the rest.

>>3090379
I think Lenin himself had to record the drums because Ringo was useless

>>3090445
Yeah and Stalin played guitar.

>>3090749
Trotsky on bass.

Fun fact the first romans was ruled by kings who was black. Tarquinius superbus the last black king of rome was overthrown by the whiteys who ruled rome for a couple of centuries. Until sulla the great black general overthrew the whiteys and exterminated them in the social war. Now blacks was running rome again and a whitey wasnt seen in the region again until it was sacked by alaric and the whiteys eventually killed or sent the black romans to africa. Julius caesar was black

we wuz beatles n shit

Beatles sucked. Nothing but sing along songs for hippies and fags

Lennon stole a song from Zappa. Fuck the beatles.

>>3090925
>>3090950
>*blacks do literally anything worthy of taking credit for*
>HAHAHA WE WUZ X N SHIT

are those the beach boys?

Is hating the Beatles one of the more childish and edgy opinions out there?

Why didn't you post this on /mu/sic, a board made to discuss exactly the topic of your shitty thread? Are you afraid that people who are actually knowledgeable about music will mock you or worse, ignore your retarded thread?

>>3090279
is /mu/ history /his/ or /mu/?

>>3092299
is anime history /a/ or /his/?
is video game history /v/ or /his/?
is automotive history /o/ or /his/?
is sports history /sp/ or /his/?
How fucking dumb do you have to be for this to be an actual question for you?

>>3090445
>>3090749
>>3090881
would listen/10

Who would be on vocals

>>3093409

Gorbachev

>>3092251
Absolutely. They are known by anyone who takes music and their own opinion seriously as superior for real reasons. The only reason I ever hear for why they are bad is that they suck, it's "just hippie music" , or some shallow attack on their character.

The Beatles are exemplary in almost every regard you can measure quality in. Taste is taste but people who try to make objective claims that they are bad are nothing but edgy bastards and musically illiterate fools.

>>3092284
>/mu/
>actually knowledgeable about music