Should historical sites destroyed by Isis be rebuilt?
>>3085541
after the country itself gets rebuilt and has money to spare, it should
>>3085541
No, although maybe replicas should be built nearby. The actual buildings and statuary on the sites were not important because they were buildings and statuary, what mattered was their historical significance, which can't really be inheritd by similar buildings on the same site.
>>3085541
Mosques should be build in their place. You dirty numale fedora cuck postmale low test mangina.
>>3085541
They should be rebuilt, but in Western countries. Arabs are obviously not able to defend such sites.
All historical sites should be demolished and be replaced with temples of science
Waste of money. The money should be donated to increase African birth rates and to boost Israel armĀ“s program.
>>3085584
They destroyed a lot of mosques, so yeah. Now go back to rebbit
If it's historical it can't truly be rebuilt.
I hope the ghosts of time bury islam.
>>3085745
Not happening habibi
In my opinion Islam should be destroyed and the Middle East should be greened.
>>3085725
>If it's historical it can't truly be rebuilt.
You think so?
>>3085786
Go back to your shitty subreddit kiddo, adults are talking here
>>3085791
that's incredibly autistic, why not just rebuild the fucking thing as it was?
who gives a fuck if the rocks are original or not?
>>3085791
Can we just make this into a terrible restorations thread?
Before
After
do you like it :^)?
>>3085819
it's not so dreary and mold covered now
>>3085799
Removing Islam is the only logical conclusion to it, bucko.
The destruction of these ruins is in itself history