How concrete have borders historically been?
Say for example, 18th century Europe?
>>3085173
a river or a mountain range was about as concrete as it gets
>>3085173
tfw no nympho kuruminha gf
>>3085173
I live in Germany, and if you wander around forests and hilly regions, you can still find old (literal) milestones from the 18th century. Basically a rectangular stone block, the width of a loaf of bread, but a metre high (designs vary), with the year and a name chiseled in, although most are pretty eroded. These were used to demarcate borders.
Europe's pretty crowded, relatively speaking, so borders were jealously niggled over.
>>3085255
Nevermind the thread subject (which is idiotic anyway). Spam curuminhas and bundas plx.
>>3085173
>How concrete
What do you mean by that? Like, did people care where they were? Generally yes. Did they change a lot? Generally yes. Were there physical fences and guards and stuff? Generally no.
>>3085390
You're in the club and this girl slaps your gf's ass. What do /his/?
>>3085409
COLONIZE DAT
>>3085409
smear her paint, (if you catch my drift)
>>3085390
>>3085390
>>3085173
Borders have been quite lose up until the rise of nations, passport control was also quite lose. Identification and therefore belonging to a certain state really came up in the 19th century and a unified passport system after WWI
>>3086722
Just google kuruminha
>>3085173
As concrete as the nation was able to enforce without national ID's or picture ID's of any sort.
But if you're talking about whether or not say a Milanese could expect to freely move to say Madrid, the answer is usually yes with a bunch of unofficial and official asterisks involved.
>>3086752
cool, thanks!
>>3086722
there isn't much porn of her
>>3086944
well, there is my head...
>>3086692
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Yhyp-_hX2s
>>3086752