Ancestry DNA kits

>>3081767

Yeah 23&me is good.
I have heard about alternatives but never a good reason why they would be better.

>>3081767
My uncle did an ancestory . com one, i think. so anyways him and this random woman on the other side of the country have an incredibly close match. they get to talking, turns out my grand father slept around back in the 50's knocked up some secretary and the baby was sent for adoption. This woman had been searching her whole adult life for her biological family. but year 23 is pretty good. i guess its the one i used

File: DNA Results SBH.png (74KB, 942x275px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 942x275px

>>3081767
oy vey

>>3081767
Depends on what you're interested in. The 23andme test is good all around, fairly quick return time (little less than 3 weeks for me), and you can download the raw data for use on third party sites.

There are more specific tests on FamilyTreeDNA, if you're interested in something specific about your heritage or want to take part in their surname projects.

>>3081959
>>3082041
kek

>>3082175
Originally it was just the ancestry part that appealed to me but the fact that 23andme will tell me a lot more useful shit like my chances of different illnesses and effects of different medication appeals to me too

>>3082512
>medication appeals

The health portion costs extra if done through 23andme. I paid for the ancestry test only then just used my raw data through Promethease for $5. Seems to be common practice.

>>3081767
Doesn't 23andme cost something like 300 bucks?

>>3082615
Do you not have at least a high school diploma ?

>>3082627
Feel free to correct me

>>3082659
I mean, 23andme is $99 cancuck buck's

So by all means for an American it should be cheaper