My best guess would be the Aztecs.
It's hard to imagine a more brutal culture than one based on warfare, slavery and human sacrifice.
But I'm sure /his/ can change my mind.
http://faculty.uml.edu/ethan_Spanier/Teaching/documents/CP6.0AssyrianTorture.pdf
>>3081407
The Spartans where pretty brutal
>>3081407
White civilization.
>>3081407
A Persian eunuch made a Greek castrate his 4 children then his children castrated him. Shit was brutal in most cultures for a long ass time.
>>3081477
Zap Slamchest
>>3081477
Whip Squatthrust McThornbody
>>3081477
Smash Side-Iron
>>3081477
Thick Hardmeat
I win
>>3081477
Blast Chunkhead
>>3081407
A lot of cultures were built on warfare and slavery, Aztecs just really liked human sacrifice and that sets them apart. Btw their style of slavery seems lenient compared to others.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aztec_slavery
Why are the muh Aztecs were evil fags still unable to conceive of something called human nature?
>>3081477
>Smash Beefknob
Gay as fuck fammo
>>3081477
bold deadlift
but i'm shy and weak...
>>3081407
Anglos, Assyrians, Germans, Japanese and Comanche.
Aztecs just had human sacrifice but they don't compare to the above peoples brutality.
>>3081477
Bold Slamchest
>>3081407
The modern Chinese
>>3081407
>It's hard to imagine a more brutal culture than one based on warfare, slavery and human sacrifice.
>But I'm sure /his/ can change my mind.
So Sparta was the most barbaric Civ.
>>3081407
If you are honest about it OP the aztecs did not murder more people than the europeans of their time, who would not mind the butcher for religious reasons. The aztecs are just used as a scapegoat of what barbarism is. Were the romans barbarians for killing people for entretaintment in their arenas?
>>3081488
r u me?
>>3081407
aztecs
>>3082765
The idea you should butcher those of another religion is as barbaric as human sacrifice, but it does not result in butchery in places where everyone has the same religion.
>>3081407
The Eternal Anglo.
Unironically Western civilization.
>>3081407
>Christianity 31% of the humain population
>Islam 22%
>Atheist 15%
>Hinduism 13%
y-yeah that the a-aztecs
>inb4 barbarism is subjective and morals don't exist hurr durr
>>3081407
>>3084709
>>3082479
>It's hard to imagine a more brutal culture than one based on warfare, slavery and human sacrifice.
That's monotheist civilization more than Aztec - just think about how many worthless scumbags we've had in positions of authority over the centuries and how many decent/innocent/worthwhile people they've tortured and/or killed.
But, like Jesus said, "What does it profit a man if he gain the whole world and forfeit his soul?"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NOWmRG7euy0
>>3081407
>My best guess would be the Aztecs.
Not even close. For all their brutality the Aztecs still had monumental architecture, written poetry, sagas, music and musical instruments and a paradoxical duality that celebrated life as well as death.
If you want to see real barbarians with trappings of civilizations look at people like the Caribs, Maori, Polynesians or Iron age Irish or basically anyone that practiced regular and widespread cannibalism and Genocide and little else.
>>3081477
Buck McRunfast
>>3081407
USA
t. Avram Noam Chomsky
>>3085063
How the fuck does modern religion factor into this.
>>3081407
Germany
>>3086893
Explain
>>3086891
>It's hard to imagine a more brutal culture than one based on warfare, slavery and human sacrifice.
>you should die,kill for: a book, a dead man, an ideology, me, mony,...
You don't become this BIG without a barbaric culture anon.
Any way barbrism is subjective, cultural like morals.
>>3081407
Didn't change too much nowadays
>>3081407
>control+f
>Vandals
>Phrase not found.
You had ONE job.
>>3081477
>Punch Hardcheese
I like it
>>3081407
>What is the most barbaric Civilization in history
Maori
Their tribes rolled around literally genociding any weaker tribe and then eating them. When Europeans rolled around all they did was use their tech to genocide and eat more people going so far as sailing to a nearby isolated island group and eating damn near everyone there.
The Aztecs weren't even more brutal than the Spanish who conquered them, let alone "most barbarous ever."
>>3087744
They were a little more brutal.
>>3081407
Technically civilization becomes more barbaric by the day and each. Just as time degrades our body to old age so our society becomes more and more degraded over time. The pollution is rampant, we've invented weapons of mass destruction, sex is prominent and socially acceptable, and we have slaughterhouses designed to do nothing but slaughtered animals to satisfy our taste for meat. This degenerate stage of civilization is called the Kali Yuga
>>3087054
>>3081477
Smash Buttsteak. Sounds awesome.
>>3082492
That's the joke.
>>3084685
>but it does not result in butchery in places where everyone has the same religion.
>what is the ME
>>3087719
>this
More people need to know about how degenerate the Maori are. Basically the even more retarded cousins of the nigger
The water nigger
>>3081407
Definitely the Aztec. It was only through sheer luck that they haven't developed iron weapons when the Spaniards arrived. Imagine if the Conquistadors found those mf's with swords and armor.
>>3081407
Pick any Muslim majority country.
>>3087744
That distinction might have to go with the Mayans. They're supposed to have started industrial-scale human sacrifices that make the Nazis look like amateurs
>>3087719
You're referencing the beginning of Guns Germs and Steel, right?
>>3087812
If sex wasnt socially acceptable you wouldnt be here, faggot.
>>3090623
Paris isn't that bad
>>3081477
>Trunk Chunkhead
I like it
>>3081407
The USA. Hiroshima and Nagasaki alone are worst than all the Aztec sacrifices.
>>3093384
>implying its worse than nanking, comfort women, unit 731 and shiro ishii
shamefur dispray
>>3093416
Didn't imply that. Only said Hiroshima & Nagasaki was worse than the Aztec sacrifices. But if you add up Hiroshima + Nagasaki + Vietnam + CIA etc. I think its the most brutal civilization to date.
>>3093435
m8, the japs murdered between 3 and 10 million civillians during ww2, the US is nowhere NEAR being the most brutal civilization
>>3090628
That's a ridiculous statement to make. Aztecs were far bigger on human sacrifice than the Maya ever were.
>>3093384
Ghengis khan killed more people in a shorter amount of time than the US killed the Japanese with combat and the bombs combined.
>>3081477
>Fridge Hardmeat
fuck yeah
>>3087812
>muh degeneracy
Cato pls go
>>3081407
Abbos
>>3090552
I thought water nigger is a contradiction in terms, like frostfire or moderate islam
>>3093449
Quick google:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/us-has-killed-more-than-20-million-people-in-37-victim-nations-since-world-war-ii/5492051
>The overall conclusion reached is that the United States most likely has been responsible since WWII for the deaths of between 20 and 30 million people in wars and conflicts scattered over the world.
And that's post WWII.
>>3093814
This is probably the best answer.
>>3081477
Slam Mcrunfast
>>3081407
Spanish Empire
>>3090628
>maya
>industrial-scale human sacrifices
Uh, where did you even hear that?
The Mongols and Central Asians were the most brutal and barbaric by the sheer amount of people they slaughtered.
Ghenghis's Khanate killed more people as a % than WW2 did. They'd go around cities killing anyone taller than a wagon wheel and leave only women who survived rape and very young children alive.
>>3081407
>slavery
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aztec_slavery
https://slaveryinjustice.wordpress.com/slavery-in-ancient-aztec-mayan-and-inca/
Aztec slavery wasn't something particulary cruel.
>>3084685
>The religions wars were made because of religious matter and not because of secessions, insurrections and negation of king's authorities
>>3081477
Buff slagcheek
>>3081463
fpbp
Assyrians don't fuck around
>>3081477
>Trunk Rockbone
Come at me.
>>3081477
Fist Deadlift Slamchest. I think I'll drop my first last name. Fist Slamchest is perfect.
>>3081407
Any non-Greek civilization.