Should they administer IQ tests to humanities departments in

>>3069266

No. IQ tests are limited by the understanding of intelligence of the people administering them. Theyre good to a point, but also a pseudo-intellectual circle jerk

>>3069266
No. We must keep up with affirmative action.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't IQ tests only good for proving how good a person us at taking IQ tests?

No professional places any significance on IQ alone

>>3069266
sounds like the same mindset that makes people think racism tests are a good idea
sort yourself

>>3069266
Post your iq score op

>>3069502
180 here.

>>3069508
I'm 210.

>>3069512
Very nice.

>>3069496
Only if you score lowly. It is okay for higher scores, but good for any scores suggesting learning disabilities which was the original application.

>>3069266
That test wouldn't work because I tested at 131 IQ on the Stanford-Binet and I am by and far the biggest pseudo-intellectual I know.

>>3069266
>IQ
>humanities

When will the "scientism" meme die off?

>>3069552
Bragging about IQ scores is one of the biggest clues that someone is a pseud.

>>3069266
a guy can be just a smart crook

>>3069575
I wasn't bragging, I was just proving OP wrong. How was I bragging? What should I have said otherwise?

>>3069575
wanna know how I know you're insecure

>>3069266
yes because peterson would be the first to go and i don't have to see his stupid face ever again

>>3069266
Why would the humanities need validation from people like OP? If /pol/ is to be believed, the humanities have had the whole western civilizations by the balls for the last 50 years.

>>3069611
I didn't say you were. I was supporting your conclusion.

>>3069624
Because you have an IQ of 150, right?