Eternal recurrence

Nietzsche spoke about it, right? Idea rests on two factors, that time is infinte but numbers of things are finite. Thus everything will in time repeat itself, eternally. But what if number of things is infinte as well?

Look up the ontological argument, God's existence is just taken for granted these days since the issue has been done and dusted.

>>3062770
>when it can be mathematically proven,
Yeeah, no.

>>3062798
>what is poincare recurrence theorem

>>3062805
umm... a theorem?
We can't sure what happens on such large timescale.
There is a popular theory(that rests on a ton of other theories were aren't sure about) that say there is a limited number of coins the Big Bang jukebox has(assuming the whole rebirth from macro-scale quantum foam is a thing, and it won't be just "frozen iron orbs floating in an eternal night" forever).

>>3062825
Not a large timescale, an infinite timescale, and we are sure what happens. The math says that on an infinite timeline all possibilities become certainties.

>>3062770
>can be mathematically proven

Source? Or are you just making a Wild claim. Cause it sounds like you don't know shit.

>>3062785
There is such thing as perfection.
It's more perfect to exist than to not exist.
There for a perfect thing exists.
Since my waifu is the perfect thing she exists.

That's about the level of discourse ontological arguements operate at. No one takes them seriously because they are jokes. Hell ontology itself is a joke.

>being is an empty fiction

>>3062837
>and we are sure what happens.
We aren't.
We are still stuck at the theory phase.
Stop being retarded.

>>3062852
Google, use it.

>>3062868
Google, use it.

File: Screenshot_1.png (170KB, 791x550px) Image search: [Google]

170KB, 791x550px

>>3062876