Buddha vs Mahavira Buddhism vs Jainism 2500 years later, the

Me.

File: 1481701386369.png (866KB, 760x864px) Image search: [Google]

866KB, 760x864px

>>3046422
kamma is intention, not result; so the buddha wins

>>3046422
Hinduism

>>3046422
The one who doesn't require his adepts a starvation to death

>>3046422
Jainism, tirthankara's were not limited by their sex. Both sexes can become ascetics, buddhists only allowed female monks a few centuries after the death of buddha.

>>3046762
Its not a requirement, its simply allowed. There is not forcing in jainism, it isnt an abrahamic religion.

>>3046776
>buddhists only allowed female monks a few centuries after the death of buddha.

Not true

>>3046422
Whats the difference between the two there literally same?

>>3047274
Buddha opposed the Vedas, while Mahavira was guided by Indra, a God from the Vedas.

>>3046811
>hasnt read Pali Vinaya
I am not surprised, you are probably some stupid white hipster pretending to be a buddhist, dirty Mleccha.

>>3047295
Oh ok thanks

>>3047295
Dharma, Karma, Nirvana are all concepts from HInduism, so is the concept of rebirth, the supreme consciousness, enlightenment through meditation and the concept of Ahimsa as well.

>>3047313

Buddha agreed to admit nuns in his lifetime m80

>>3047321
Buddha only adopted the names, not the meanings. He used the same words, as he spoke the same language, but he redefined them.

>>3047339
Thats like saying that Christians using neoplatonic terms but slightly changing the meaning doesn't mean the concepts were related

Of course they were related, the ideas were just slightly changed to fit the new theology

>>3046433
no Me