Really makes you think.
>>3045244
true
if you disagree you're a barbarian savage
China is still barbaric today.
>>3045310
lol no though
>>3045244
history is written by victor
WOKE AF
>>3045312
lol yeah though
>>3045244
And is China not more equal today than yesterday
Whilst also the Chinese were literally barbars
>>3045244
same tool, different function
The Qing broke the non-aggression principle when they denied goodly Anglo merchants the right to trade freely in their realm.
>>3045316
Who is this victor and who left him in charge of writting history?
>>3046042
So what are the thresholds for being primitive, savage, barbarous,semi-civilized and civilized?
>>3046068
My opinions> your opinions
>>3046068
If the barbarism holds a purpose, it's civilization.
Subjugation of native culture in order to establish a system that leads to a first world nation? Civilization.
Cutting off hands because you decide God hates left hands? Barbarism.
>>3046068
Whatever threshold serves the "civilized" side's propaganda.
>>3045244
>>3045249
>>3045310
>>3045312
>>3045316
>>3045334
>>3045518
>>3045534
>>3045616
>>3046042
>>3046068
>>3046088
>>3046094
>>3046097
>>3046134
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jxoMIH0BU00
Half of (you) are the bald "gentleman" in the video
>>3046097
>that memorial
>literally fought so they could keep selling their drugs to the chinese
Jesus
>>3046139
He was speaking the truth. Whether it makes people uncomfortable matters not
>>3046123
This. It's a two tier system.
>>3046068
my country > your country
>>3045316
This is dumbest saying ever.
>>3046068
What are the thresholds?
Anyone still human and not a higher life form as far as I'm concerned. Idc how edgy that makes me sound. Humans need to do better or naming word that is supposed to come from the word that is supposed to mean opposite of cruel or apathetic(humane/humanism) is a mistake.
>>3045244
The same comparison can be applied to the Europeans "civilizing" the Native Americans as well.
>>3046139
>Man speaks the truth entirely
>The joke is he has a funny voice and some guy calls him an anus
British really suck at arguments huh
>>3046042
>the marine was a barbarian
He would have had some training in Latin and his officer would know a fair amount of Greek
Shut up you have no points
>>3048177
Watch Yes minister
>>3045534
>this is what bribongs actually believe
>>3045244
Why was China so scary to 19th century Europe? I see these propaganda and political cartoons all the time with a big, scary Chinaman as if China was going to conquer the world or something then.
>>3049856
China is big.
Guys... Both used guns to kill people, so that means both are the same. I get it now, it doesn't matter WHY you're fighting, because simply fighting makes you both as evil as each other. Am I woke yet?
As you can see from my picture. Both the criminal and the policeman have a gun, therefore there is no moral distinction between the two. Aren't I clever?
>>3049969
Kidnapping someone at gunpoint is morally equivalent to the police arresting the kidnapper.
>>3049978
No it isn't you absolute fucking imbecile. Not unless me killing you so I can rob your house is equivalent to you killing me in self-defence.
>>3046238
It's a cliche but obviously true
>>3049969
So, you're assuming the Chinese guy OPs pic is in the wrong just because he's Chinese?