ITT: Draw historical events poorly and see if people can guess them
>>3044341
Henry the eighth?
>>3044360
Yup. Specifically, Anne Boleyn's miscarriage.
>>3044341
>the fucking plague doctor
hardcore mode
>>3044404
Jesuits in Latin America?
>>3044426
Manchu invasion of the Ming?
Fall of Byzantium?
>>3044436
Close with the second, but no
>>3044445
sack of rome?
>>3044404
Sack of Constantinople
>>3044459
Close. Siege of Catholic Zara, right before Constantinople. They put Catholic/Christian flags on the city walls while the Crusaders and Venetians advanced on them.
>>3044479
Too obvious, Adolf.
>>3044486
Massacre of L*tins.
>>3044498
Easy enough, I suppose. Byzzies had it coming.
>>3044521
>massacre of Latins was a religious conflict
>sack of Constantinople was caused by it
These memes need to die.
you'll never guess
>>3044571
Operation Barbarossa?
>>3044571
The Manhattan Project
>>3044571
Romulus killing Remus
>>3044571
The Declaration of Independence
>>3044571
Can't be the trojan war. The hoplon wasn't in use yet
>>3044593
no worries, that guy favors a long throwing spear
>>3044608
The Apollo moon landing
>>3044617
you could scarcely get warmer than the lunar surface
>>3044571
Sack of Constantinople (1204)
>>3044479
nice filename
Legends never die
>>3044647
>>3044659
Pharaoh WeWuz?
>>3044682
what?
no, not egypt in the slightest, not even egyptian architecture in my crude depiction
>>3044689
Alcibiades?
>>3044755
nope, any further hints and I might well tell you what it is
>>3044426
Siege of Nicaea?
>>3044779
while that's much warmer, it still isn't what's being depicted
>>3044789
Is it a Roman or Greek?
>>3044799
well, the last guess was a roman, and that was indicated as pretty close, so I think that might answer your question for you
>>3044787
Mongol invasion of khwarezm
>>3044804
Marcus Claudius Marcellus. That's the only other one I can think of.
>>3044571
Clearly the battle of Austerlitz
>>3044820
sadly I must again provide a negative reply
>>3044571
Can't be the Trojans as those kind of doorknobs didn't exist yet
we already have one of these threads
>>3041584