>when you BTFO both Hitler AND Stalin
How can one man be so based?
Literally no historical evidence for his existence
>>3039252
downvoted
His regime killed one million people. How can you like him?
>>3039272
Jesus Christ man, every regime ever has had people die on their watch, doesn't mean their bad. Yugoslavia was like heaven compared to the Soviet Union, Nazi Germany or DPRK.
>>3039272
Yeah he killed 6 gorillion Ustashe and Chetniks
>Literally makes a country that lives off foreign loans and that is so badly put together that it splits as soon as Tito dies.
>LOL GUYZ THIS IS AN EXAMPLE OF COMMUNISM THAT WORKS FUCK SOVIETS WE ARE NON-ALIGNED
So...
>>3039344
Modern ex-yu countries have 10x bigger debts than Yugoslavia ever had
>>3039272
It was closer to 400,000 and all immediately after the war. I don't think the partisans even organised all of them. A lot of revenge in the woods and turning of blind eyes.
>>3039344
It's true, he fucked up by not reforming the economy and political system when he had the chance in the 60s
>>3039360
Yes, and that is a direct result of both Tito's economic policies and the cost of yugoslav wars.
>>3039371
By the time Yugoslavia dissolved Tito was already dead for more than 10 years.
He may have left some unresolved differences but his successors fucked it up even more.
>>3039380
Nah it was going that way since the early 70s
>>3039396
In what way? Nationalism was a threat but the escalation could've been avoided if post-Tito rulership wasn't that retarded.
>>3039245
Tito did jack shit, as did most resistance fighters eber, Tito was helped by both the brits and the soviets, the only thing they did was harass the germans who were already retreating to germany, they couldnt even handle Bulgaria, they got btfo by the Bulgarians, it was the Soviet advance that got Bulgaria out of the war.
>>3039518
[citation needed]
>>3039245
*teleports at your back*
>>3039936
M'ladina
Also was Tito smug Pepe the whole time?
>>3039411
Nationalism wasn't a big problem until the late 80s when the economy tanked. The economic decline began in the 70s due to the lack of reforms.
>>3040089
yes
>>3040335
ironicaly it was the people demanding the reforms in the early 70is that fucked up because the reforms were allready planned but then with the 71. protests he couldnt seem weak so the reforms got pushed back to act hardline, because then if you talked about reforms youre a nazi and tito cant be a nazi so no reforms
silly shit
the 74 constitution should of been realy implemented and practiced and everithing would have worked out just fine
>>3039245
he had more guts than this crippled wretch, FDR
>>3039360
relative to GDP? No way.
>>3039272
talk shit get hit tee bee aytch senpai