Was Christ when he was around fully Divine? or was he just a Man who from being crucified and taking on mans sins and becoming the Last Lamb then become Divine? or the Resurrection?
Or was he both Man and God?
>>3037898
This is theology mate.
Which means you interpret the works the way it fits you so you can back up your claim about a guy that claimed he was the son of god.
>>3037898
belongs to /x/ not /his/
>>3037898
depends on your theology
But in antiquity nobody but maybe gnostics believed in "evolution" of Christ from mortal to divine. People believed Christ was fully God, or subordinationist god Logos, or archangel, or just a prophet. Usually this Christ, whatever He may be, never changed his ontological status through His mission (or even existence). If treated as lower-than-God Logos, He would still be Logos. If treated as a prophet, He would be still human (saintly of course, but human).
>>3037898
Go away to /x/ pls
>>3037898
Chalcedon was over 1500 years ago. Get with the program.