What the fuck was wrong with the Aztecs?

>>3027857
I dunno, what the fuck was wrong with the Spanish?

> Using cultural fuckery to justify interference in the affairs of a foreign state.

File: 260-day ritual.jpg (81KB, 435x444px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 435x444px

They were pretty amusing tbqh

>>3027888
Omg look at the pic related, why wouldn't there be interference?? You are going off topic and making a new question for this thread

>>3027857
Nothing. They were trying to balance and order their world according to their worldview.

jesus, hispanics are just fucked genetically
aztec savages + spaniards (who are mixed between Arabs, Visigoths, Celts)

>>3028534
All of those people you mentioned are based.

>>3027888
>Moving the goalpost

File: chapel of skulls.jpg (865KB, 2048x1551px) Image search: [Google]

865KB, 2048x1551px

What the fuck was wrong with the Europeans?

>>3028534
Incas were superior to europeans though.

>>3028579
Why is European culture so dark and obsessed with death?

>>3028566
arabs are fags

>>3028534
>spaniards (who are mixed between Arabs, Visigoths, Celts)
You forgot Romans, Iberians and maybe even Phoenicians.

File: DSC_0343.jpg (2MB, 3872x2592px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3872x2592px

>>3028579
Danse Macabre

>>3028579
They died from natural causes

File: 3c6343e3[1].jpg (53KB, 949x472px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 949x472px

>>3027857
>>3028135

People call Muslims/Middle easterners violent. South America, with or without Christianity is a the most violent shit hole on the planet. More so than Saharan Africa.

Pic related

>>3028658
>mfw the superior inca meme is real

File: santa muerte.jpg (47KB, 442x555px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 442x555px

>>3028589
>so dark and obsessed with death
Not any more than Mexicans.

>>3028658
It wasn't always violent there though. Prior to the civil war and escalating tensions of the mid 70s El Salvador was pretty safe. After the civil war gangs formed in the US apparently taking after the chicano ones and they were deported back to El Salvador where the problem was ignored by our corrupt government and the youths weren't reintegrated to society. Then by the mid 2000s the problem blew up in the face of everyone and now death squads have returned to

>>3028658
So Argentina really is white after all.
>Honduras, Guatemala, Salvador
Holy fuck hahaha

File: boobsbutt.inline_yes.jpg (247KB, 1000x800px) Image search: [Google]

247KB, 1000x800px

>>3028701
Argentina has always been white.

>>3028579
While morbid, that's just bones of normal corpses, not a result of mass sacrifices.

>>3028696
That's imported European culture. Santa Muerte comes from catholicism and even Day of the Dead has been greatly influenced by Christian holidays.

>>3028712
Absolute nonsense, it doesn't exist anywhere in Europe, it's just subhuman Mexicans incorporating their Mesoamerican death cult into Catholicism much like the Caribbean niggers did with voodoo.
>Nuestra Señora de la Santa Muerte (Spanish for Our Lady of the Holy Death) or, colloquially, Santa Muerte (Holy Death), is a female deity (or folk saint depending on school of thought) Mexican folk religion, venerated primarily in Mexico and the Southwestern United States.
>Though the origins of the worship of Our Lady of the Holy Death are subject to debate, it is most likely a syncretism between pre-Columbian Mesoamerican religion and Spanish culture. Mesoamerica had always maintained a certain reverence towards death, which manifested itself among the religious practices of ancient Mexico, including in the Aztec religion.
>The Vatican has condemned the cult of Santa Muerte in Mexico as blasphemous and satanic, calling it a "degeneration of religion".

>>3028708
Based Iceland

>>3028708
>the only countries in continental Europe that like asses are muslim and gypsy shitholes
Makes sense. Iceland is the only country I cannot explain.

File: 1497208527190.jpg (71KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 1024x1024px

>>3028135
>>3028534
>>3028658
>>3028722
>According to the Spanish the Aztecs sacrificed 10 000 children every year., yet only 42 sacrificed children have been found in the most important temple of the empire. 42 children in 200 years. On the same spot the Spanish massacred 8 000 unarmed nobles and their children in a couple of hours. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massacre_in_the_Great_Temple

>>3028744
Asses are for grown-up men and people with high-sexual drive. Boobs are for manchildren and people with low sexual drive.

>>3028749
>Asses are for niggers and low IQ retard
Fixed.

>>3028751
I have 135 IQ and I like asses. Not that fat, but I like them.

>>3028712
>Santa Muerte comes from catholicism
Literally end yourself.

>>3028754
Are you a nigger?

>>3028756
I'm a mutt between spanish, coast and mountain amerindian and nigger.

>>3028763
My condolences, that sounds like an abominable mixture. Colombian or Ecuadorean?

>>3028766
It's not that bad, I lost my virginity on HS anyway.
I'm Spanish according to my ID card :)

>>3028772
Spanish citizenship you mean?

>>3028772
>I lost my virginity on HS anyway
What does that have to do with anything?

>>3028575
t. conquistador

>>3028773
Yep.
>>3028774
It's not a bad amixture tho :)

File: lactating dog.jpg (85KB, 532x800px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 532x800px

>>3028749
>>3028751
>>3028756
>>3028708
Uhm you do know that women with bigger hips and by extension ass are more equip for child bearing right? If we are actually going to be /his/torians here like we should, instead of looking at modern culture and trends, Romans and Greeks prefered women with larger hips. There isn't even much evidence that men are instinctively attracted to breast outside of modern sensibilities and beauty standards. The main function of breasts has always been to feed babies and this occurs fine regardless of the size of the breasts. Otherwise, women would all have evolved to have very large breasts.
At most, the fact that human females always have visible breasts regardless of whether they are lactating could show some significance, bit it is likely secondary to hips and butts. One possibility in my opinion and a couple others is they evolved to simply show a person is likely female more easily and not male or as an "alternative ass" on the front considering they're round symmetric in n shape similar to butts. Makes some sense considering that humans are of the very few mammals that have sex face to face too, instead of only from the back.

>>3028817
>>3028778
>>3028772
>>3028766
>>3028763
>>3028756
>>3028755
>>3028754
>>3028751
>>3028749
>>3028744
>>3028737
>>3028722
>>3028712
>>3028708
>>3028701
>>3028696
>>3028658
this board was a mistake

>>3028869
Your birth was a mistake.

>>3028817
Hips =/= ass

File: Thou shalt not kill.png (73KB, 1056x596px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 1056x596px

>>3028658
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_I
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II
friendly reminder

>>3028878
War is okay. Capturing people by the thousands and sacrificing them to some moon god, or behading them because they didn't pay their monthly tribute to the narcos, is not okay.

File: 1489357502025.png (455KB, 500x611px) Image search: [Google]

455KB, 500x611px

>>3028885
>Capturing people by the thousands and sacrificing them to some moon god
Yeah, doing it for the god who told you to not kill is better.

>Pope Clement VII had given his support to the Kingdom of France in an attempt to alter the balance of power in the region, and free the Papacy from dependency, i.e. a growing weakness to "Imperial domination" by the Holy Roman Empire (and the Habsburg dynasty).
>The army of the Holy Roman Emperor defeated the French army in Italy, but funds were not available to pay the soldiers. The 34,000 Imperial troops mutinied and forced their commander, Charles III, Duke of Bourbon and Constable of France, to lead them towards Rome.
>After the brutal execution of some 1,000 defenders of the Papal capital and shrines, the pillage began. Churches and monasteries, as well as the palaces of prelates and cardinals, were looted and destroyed. Even pro-Imperial cardinals had to pay to save their properties from the rampaging soldiers. On 8 May, Cardinal Pompeo Colonna, a personal enemy of Clement VII, entered the city. He was followed by peasants from his fiefs, who had come to avenge the sacks they had suffered by Papal armies.
>The population of Rome dropped from some 55,000 before the attack, to 10,000. An estimated 6,000 to 12,000 people were murdered.
>Many Imperial soldiers also died in the following months (they remained in the city until February 1528) from diseases caused by the large number of unburied dead bodies in the city. The pillage only ended when, after eight months, the food ran out, there was no one left to ransom and plague appeared.

>>3028869
Hey, at least I'm the only one using historical facts and interpretations to make an argument here. There rest of them are just using modern society and "muh"degeneracy to make their argument.
>>3028874
Yes it does,It almost always follows that women who have a larger distribution of fat at their hips also a larger distribution at the butt as well. Otherwise, it kind of looks weird; just admit you are wrong. Breast worship is more of a product of more modern sexulization by porn and art.

File: Priest of Cholula devoured by dogs - Codex Aperreamiento.jpg (75KB, 462x500px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 462x500px

>>3028885
>or behading them because they didn't pay their monthly tribute to the narcos
really makes you think
>Guzman's troops everywhere committed terrible depredations. The first province he marched through was Mechoacan, the inhabitants of which still possessed abundance of gold, though not of the finest quality, as it contained a considerable alloy of silver, for which reason Guzman compelled them to contribute a larger amount. Casonci, the principal cazique of the province, boldly refused to give him so great a quantity of gold as he demanded, wherefore Guzman ordered him to be tortured, by pouring hot oil over his feet; but as the unfortunate cazique, notwithstanding all the torments he endured, still remained firm to his purpose, he was ordered to be hung.
- The True History of the Conquest of New Spain by Bernal Diaz del Castillo, CXCVII

>>3027857
They were proto-American Imperialists

File: IMG_20161222_103345.jpg (106KB, 1129x681px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 1129x681px

>>3028708
>A large amount of the red countries are races and ethnicities stereotyped as having women with large asses, likes blacks and latinos
>blue countries are mostly races infamous for having flat women, like whites and asians
Hmm..

All casual conjecture aside, I love me some thick ass. No, I'm not black nor do I have a low IQ.

>>3028980
What does what one finds sexually attractive have to do with IQ for fuck sakes?! That image has got to be the definition of correlation does not mean shit. If it happens to rain everytime I have an exam, but never when I don't, does that mean I control the whether. Who makes up this shit? Get over yourselves and stop trying to make up reasons why you must be superior to other people you've never met to get over your own insecurities.

>>3028980
>>3029067
Oops sorry I replied to the wrong person.
Meant to reply to
>>3028744
>>3028749

>>3028980
IQ is important, because civilized people fuck facing each other while animals fuck each other from behind like monkeys do, hence the exposure of tits and ass respectively.

File: china.png (68KB, 1396x778px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 1396x778px

>>3028878
>Those beginner-tier casualties
Step aside, white boy.

>>3029067
My entire family has never had a problem with maths and academic stuff. We all had mathematical "talent" on a certain degree.

All the brainlet whiteys I've beat intelectually have showed me the actual situation of the white man on the world.

There was one event long ago, I remember a white nerd who bullied latinos, was a fascist-wannabe and he tried to do the same with me (almost 3 years of difference). He always asked me about definitions and tried to look down on me, unfortunately he failed so hard and got ridiculed by my poker face and correct answer every time.

It's kind of funny knowing that he actually wasn't that bright; my ecuadorian friend got better grades than him without studying that much.

Asses are better.

>>3028917
fat distribution at the hips is not what helps with child birth

>>3029100
>Implying because a woman has a big ass men hit it from the back most the time.
What is groping during sex??(mainly sideways but also missionary).
Confirmed for virgin. Like it's indisputable anon. You are a virgin and have no idea what you are talking about and it is all speculation for you. Just go away and continue to fap to porn with big breasted women you will never fuck anyway while you speculate how superior you and your race are because of it.
Good day and quit derailing the thread with pseudoscience based on your inexperience.

File: 13308230_10209382399099290_3259349029407909440_o.jpg (167KB, 1228x2048px) Image search: [Google]

167KB, 1228x2048px

I like how this turned into a ass vs tits thread. To bring it on topic of the Aztecs, a reminder that they favored the ass too - pic related.

File: 5780.jpg (39KB, 552x600px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 552x600px

>>3029186
The Maya on the other hand favored tits.

>>3028746
>Archeologists discover the remains of "only" sacrificed 42 children hundreds of years later
>This means that only 42 children were sacrificed
LOL
There's nothing more pathetic than this meme of modern archeologists overturning eye-witness testimony because they find a few shards of pottery in a ditch.

>>3029199
>testimony>material proof
?

>>3029159
May point is it usually is accompanied by fat distribution. Fat definitely helps with padding anyway. Not just birth is important but also carrying a child to term.

Get over yourself anyway, all humans have sex face to face or from the back like I mentioned earlier. It's a hallmark of being human and there is little variance between races in this duality. That shitty "plot" (which btw has no context so you can hardly extrapolate anything to an entire country's preferences based on a group of people who happen to browse a site regularly but I don't expect you to be scientifically literate) shows nothing in way of variance of how these people will have sex even most of the time. It is all speculation by you. That and the fact you are a virgin who thinks there is only one novelty of big asses and that is to fuck from behind. Let's forget about groping during sex. Of course, because you have never had it.

>>3029186
>>3029190
Or..Or how about this novelty? It may be a revolutionary concept for autists on this site but how about the possiblity that men can like both on an actual woman?

It's almost like because we find one artifact that showed a people having sex a thought of way that it is how they always had it. Or even worse, that it is how most people preferred it.

>>3029263
I like both. But a woman with nice tits and no ass is more disappointing than a woman with small tits and a nice ass. Thicc is truly god tier though.

>>3028658
Jesus, I've been to Jamaica, I didn't realize what a shithole it was

>>3029190
Why is the man so small compared to the women btw? Lol
Did some of these men really want THICC women to the point where they were actually almost fat?

>>3027857
Nothing, they were more advanced than Galls(Ancestors of French nation). But Aztecs had bad luck: Spanish Conquistadors destroyed Aztec Empire.

>>3029206
>Escaped sex slave testifies that captors killed hundreds of people
>police dig up the basement and only find one body
>HURRR OBVIOUSLY WE SHOULD DISREGARD THE TESTIMONY OF THE WITNESS WHO IS THE ONLY REASON WE WENT DIGGING FOR BODIES IN THE FIRST PLACE CLEARLY THEY WERE LYING IT'S NOT LIKE MAYBE WE MIGHT HAVE BEEN DIGGING IN THE WRONG SPOT OR SOMETHING
The irony is I bet you uncritically believe allegations like
>>3028919
without any material evidence whatsoever.

>>3029557
>no proof=disregard testimony
Hehe try again.

Azteks were banished from mainland for centuries because of their sacrificial culture. Some Aztek prince was suppose to marry a Toltec princess, and instead they decided to flay her alive and turned up to the ceremony wearing her skin.

>>3030214
Their allies and enemies also did human sacrifice. In fact, that practice goes back pretty far in Mesoamerica.

>>3030220

Not to the extent the Azteks practiced it, and the Toltecs were horrified by it. The Maya sacrifices also often survived, since it was primarily for bloodletting.

>>3030235
The Toltecs were long gone by the time the Aztecs showed up. Toltec civilzation ended like in 11th century. Aztecs didn't show up until the 13th or 14th century.

>>3030255

The Toltecs exiled the Azteks. The Aztek dominations came after the collapse of the Toltecs yes.

Other Aztek fun fact worth mentioning is that they burnt their own literature long before the Spanish got there.

>>3030287
No the Aztecs or more specifically Mexica were Chichimec migrants and among the last of them to enter the valley of Mexico. They settled in Tenochtitlan their promised land after years of wandering as nomads. They later adopted Toltec culture since it was so highly regarded akin to a Germanic tribe copying Rome and claiming to be their successors. You're confusing Toltec with Tepanecs from Azcapotzcalco who kicked them out of Chapultepec.

The books they destroyed were of their predecessors ordered by Tlacaelel to rewrite their history once they became imperialists. It's also when they made Huitzilopochtli their Sun.

>>3028688
post erotic Inca pottery

>>3030400
Not for this thread. Better post erotic Mesoamerican art instead.

>>3030486
kek I've never seen this one

>>3030486
That's not Inca.

>>3030509
what do you mean?

>>3030513
It's Mochica or Moche. Both Andeans but Incas came afterwards.

File: 200x285_moche_culture_map.jpg (39KB, 200x285px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 200x285px

>>3030509
>"Moche pottery is some of the most varied in the world. The use of mold technology is evident. This would have enabled the mass production of certain forms. But Moche ceramics vary widely in shape and theme, with most important social activities documented in pottery, including war, metalwork, weaving and sex."

>"Traditional north coast Peruvian ceramic art uses a limited palette, relying primarily on red and white; fineline painting, fully modeled clay, veristic figures, and stirrup spouts. Moche ceramics created between 150–800 AD epitomize this style. Moche pots have been found not just at major north coast archaeological sites, such as Huaca de la luna, Huaca del sol, and Sipan, but also at small villages and unrecorded burial sites as well."

>>3030517
When I asked fo Inca pottery I was referring to Andean pottery, my bad

File: 1487485165083.jpg (80KB, 403x538px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 403x538px

>>3027857
Nothing wrong with a little human sacrifice to keep the gods and people happy.

Also, it's not like the Aztecs were the only ones with such practices.

>>3030553
Didn't Celts and Greeks do it too?

>>3030581

Very rarely, and it was generally disapproved of. A hangover from Mycenaean Greece.

>>3030581
Off the top of my head, I remember hearing about this relating to the Celts.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wicker_man

A bit off the subject from Celts and Greeks, but Japs apparently had this thing going on in the human sacrifice department.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hitobashira

>>3028534
Arab and visigoth genes are too tiny to be mentioned in their genetic base. Their main base is celt + iberian + basque

>>3029233
>Fat definitely helps with padding anyway. Not just birth is important but also carrying a child to term

No, what is attractive UNIVERSALLY is a 0.7 waist to hip ratio. You don't need a fat ass to get an easy birth, you need wide hips. So much fat on your woman while being pregnant as to maker her hips wider is actually really bad, due to 1) epigenetics and 2) ketosis, which also negatively affacts the childs brain.

There is a reason why the "boob" fraction have higehr IQs on average. It's not intelligent to go after women because they have stored too much fat in their rear end. It would be evolutionary much wiser to go after healthy slim women to be able to see the actual hip size.

Boobs on the other hand evolutionary came from the fact that we homo sapiens sapiens started to change from doggie style (animalistic) to missionary (many edvantages, like bonding, longer coitus etc). Which means, countries which prefer still ass are most likely more animalistic. The superior ones have evolved a taste for boobs.

That's what science says. I'm sorry if you now have to feel bad because you still favour a more primitive sexual characteristic.

File: danse_macabrebernt_notke_1-e1477307527501.jpg (124KB, 905x527px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 905x527px

>>3028589
1350

File: hips.jpg (106KB, 952x840px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 952x840px

>>3032180
Homo sapiens have sex both ways and your theory is full of shit. Again you know nothing of sex if you think liking a big butt on girls means person also prefers sex doggy style, you virgin. That map you showed gives no proof of that either, idiot. All humans like to pair bond extensively, it's hallmark of being human. Boob preference has nothing to do with intelligence of one race over another outside your imagination of trying to make up reasons of superiority that don't exist. There wasn't even a,study done on it either to top it off, it's all just stupid speculation on /pol/tard's part.

Btw, No woman ever gets to a hip waist ratio of 0.7 naturally. It's "ideal" but impractical. Check to see the hip ratios of actual women as reference.
I never said "so much fat" to the point she is actually fat you dingus. I simply said women with wide hips also tend to have a "fat distribution"(women naturally have more uneven fat distribution than men due to estrogen you know this right?) such as the lower body stores fat way more than the upper body and abdomen. The latter of which is actually gross(and upper body too if you're talking about arms strictly, also puts you at risk for CVD)
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02342445
Of course being too fat during pregnancy is bad! It also puts you at risk for dilated cardiomyopathy and gestational diabetes. I never said ideal is being fat. You're putting words in my mouth because you don't understand what I mean by fat distribution.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secondary_sex_characteristic

> Bad due to Epigenetics
Never mind you have no idea what you're talking about and I don't think you know what Epigenetics is nor do you understand science. If you did you wouldn't have dared cited that plot from porn hub random data collection on USERS of THAT PARTICULAR SITE as a conclusion that men in those countries prefer anything:"Nonrepresentative sample"

File: 35F94D5C00000578-3675040-image-a-4_1467730244789.jpg (78KB, 634x633px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 634x633px

>>3032489
>Btw, No woman ever gets to a hip waist ratio of 0.7 naturally. It's "ideal" but impractical.

Sorry mate, but I am a woman and 0.7 is absolutely normal and most women have it in a healthy weight. So stop acting as if you know shit. Pic related instead of your pic straight out of tumblr lmao.

>I simply said women with wide hips also tend to have a "fat distribution"
No. That's like saying blonde women tend to have long hair. Wide hips = bones. Fat ass = fat distribution. Those two are not linked, otherwise there would not be such a thing as a tight cap (due to wide hips and normal fat distribution).

>Never mind you have no idea what you're talking about
Sure, that's why there have ben epigenetic studies on for example the german people which due to war diets have born children with higher psychological problems and higher probability to get fat (store for bad times).

> If you did you wouldn't have dared cited that plot from porn hub random data collection on USERS of THAT PARTICULAR SITE
I'm not that anon, you retard. That was literaly my first comment in this thread.

>>3032489
And just to make clear that it's not a bias: I've got wide 0.6 wth due to small waist, additionally aesthetically wide thighs and small-regular C-cups making me a typical pear. So I'm not arguing for my own sake - in contrast to you, which already has stated him favouring big butts.

>>3032521
>>3032554
>B-but I wasn't that retarded anon I swear
Yet in that post you make that ridiculous claim that i already said does not hold(muh IQ and boob preference and sex face to face) with reasons backed by actual science. One of them being that "study" doesn't even use the scientific method so it is shit. And you didn't even post a source too boot. You're still an idiot and a /pol/tard at that.
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0050601#references
I said women get close to 0.7 but few if any actually have that number.
I didn't say "tight caps" can't exist,anon. I said wide hips "tend" to go with more lower body fat distribution.
I'm not arguing for my own sake, I'm arguing against unsubstantiated bias and racism that makes literally no sense based on the arguments you made with them.

>>3028708
>North Korea likes ass
>United States likes ass

Why do these two not get along again?

>>3032587
Btw I forgot to mention the hair reference was a major false equivilancy because unlike hair color and length, both fat distribution and hip size ARE DETERMINED BY ESTROGEN. But then again, I don't expect you to actually read the sources I post or anything. It's not like you're used to that seeing you barely post any youself besides pictures.

File: (you).jpg (33KB, 819x219px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 819x219px

>>3032587
>>B-but I wasn't that retarded anon I swear
Pic related you sperging butthunter.

>I said women get close to 0.7 but few if any actually have that number.
No, it's quite common, nearly all girls I know look like that. Which is obviously the most probable thing while being the middle of both extrems.

>I said wide hips "tend" to go with more lower body fat distribution.

It doesn't biologically. Your fat distribution isn't linked, although anecdotal evidance might suggest it due to often being visually linked on fat people.

>I'm arguing against unsubstantiated bias and racism
Race realism is a fact, and that distribution is somehow "saying". You might not like it but it'S widely known that noggers and south americans like big butts and cannot lie. There obviously is a genetic and therefore cultural reason for it. You might not like it, but I'm pretty sure objective studies (if ever allowed to take place in the current political climate) would prove such preferences so we would not need a porn side telling us that.

>>3032607
Yes, but the distribution of fat cells says nothing, due to the fact that fat cells usualy grow on the same body parts on women (thights, belly, ass). But you try to claim that the amount of fullness of those cells (fat cells expant and multiplivate) is linked to bone structure - which would mean your probability of getting fat is linked to it. Which isn't the case. Stop trying to sell half truths.

>>3032610
>south americans
No. We like medium and round butts. Niggers on Brazil like celulite obese asses.

>>3029133
>shit that never happened: the post

>>3029181
Fuck off nigger.

>>3032671
Whatever makes you sleep at night.

>>3032610
Because you have to be the one who posted it to agree with the study right?
I said you cited(as in referenced)it; not posted it you fucktard.
Again, you still don't get it. Your conclusion of boob preference and more human qualities like pair bonding and thus intelligence doesn't make sense because it is contingent on the fact that people who like big butts must also prefer missionary which has not been proven and can't be surmised.
And studies like that would be allowed to be held, since it doesn't necessitate studying IQ so what are you talking about?
Stop trying to fool people, you're a virgin and don't know what you're talking about. I don't care if you're actually a girl or not. It doesn't change much.

>No, it's quite common, nearly all girls I know look like that. Which is obviously the most probable thing while being the middle of both extreme

>Use anecdotal evidence
>Then condemn anecdotal evidence
Besides, did you actually measure all the girls you know?
I'm talking about from the actual averages that exist in many studies done on group. The standard deviation is always there and the average from 0.73 to 0.7
>>3032621
I'm not selling half truths, it is you that has been doing that from the beginning with the huge logical leap you and other /pol/tards made in the first place.
Genetics of individual woman would determine the fluctuations in those fat cell distributions is my point.
I didn't say you HAD to get fat with that distribution(slim is ideal) but obviously few women have <17%bf and no one can have 0%(or even 3).
And getting fat is a non sense term in a way, the correct term is "gaining" fat since getting fat paints the negative connotation of inching towards obesity and unattractive body type( i.e a fat abdomen and rolls) vs. a person who gains fat at a low increment. Those gaining fat on the lower body more are those who would be slower to gain a larger waist and gut(and thus more unattractive body type) with small weight gain.

>>3032682
Nice argument. I am sure you have such high intelligence and are great at intellectual discourse. You must be valuable in debates and your opinions highly substantiated.
>>>/pol/

>>3029133
I don't think anything is better. I just think people have their own preferences and the world would be a better place if we stop going out of our ways to make having certain preferences superior over others for no rational reason or universal truth other than for people to stroke their own egos.
/His/was in fact a mistake btw. And this comment is proof, at what point do you think it is appropriate for you to post your own personal story here?

>>3032695
>>3032610
oops meant 0.73 to 0.75*

Not* prefer missionary

>>3032610
Sorry you have a small ass, roastie. But making up /pol/ pseudoscience isn't a good excuse to make up for it.

>>3032779
It's not about her being a girl (though I find it really disturbing that a woman wants to belong on the alt right considering it attracts so many weirdos and autist who will literally say women are all inferior subhumans incapable of real love. the "Greeks were right" etc ) it's about her being wrong and illogical.

She is a virgin as I said, so she can't be a "roastie" anyway. That's why she hangs out on /pol/ and doesn't know about how actual people have sex except speculation.
It's weird because somewhere deep down I think she might have thought her being a girl would make any of this less true.

File: IMG_0698.jpg (127KB, 640x1055px) Image search: [Google]

127KB, 640x1055px

I wanted to add my 2 cents to this, but it looks like this thread is already derailed as fuck.

>>3032838
Who said anything about the alt right you stupid neckbeard

So why do you think the Aztecs built a city on the water?

>>3032850
>Neckbeard
Kek.
Alright sweety, just go back to your containment board or where ever already. This board is supposed to be for people who actually make claims on evidence and who focus on history.

>>3032886
Answer the question retard

>>3032862
Isn't it common for a civilization to arise near ample water sources. Perhaps they just took it to the next level?

>>3032862
Because they saw an eagle eating a snake on top of a stick sticking out of the lake

>>3032895
You actually wanted an answer? That is not /his/related though.

The alt right is anything that has alternative right wing views which may include any or all of these: white supremacist, race "realism" and segregatists, traditionalsim/ staunch antifeminism, contempt for homosexuality, muh Jews, contempt for Islam and all people who practice it and , then there is the added problem of being a /pol/tard which just means it's all stormfaggotry and bad science.
now go away and quit derailing with all your /pol/lacks

>>3032926
That doesn't make any sense. Sources?

>>3032850
>>3032926
This. Also there were a few other Mesoamerican cities in the middle of lakes.

>>3032838
She is wrong, yes. But I get she formed these views out of purely personal issues. It sounds shallow, but this is a general trend and it shouldn't be an ignored factor into why she thinks this way.

>>3032974
Its their story of how the city was founded nigga. Look it up.

>>3032974
It's literally in the flag of Mexico.

>>3029100
>because civilized people fuck facing each other
>What are the tens if not hundreds of sexual positions humans have came up with, both front and back
>monkeys fuck exclusively from the back
>what are bonobos
Gtfo faggot.

>>3032737
To bait poltards. Why do you think mods don't delete those silly threads?

The story is true by the way.

>>3033445
Didn't say it wasn't but again why?
You get rid of /pol/tards by superior debate skills and facts not with personal entries from your life as a kid. Bait on keeps them coming. Why do people keep treating this site like their own diary?

>>3033557
You may be right.

>>3032838
I'm proudly a right winger, you calling me "alt right" only shows your lack of, well, knowledge on anything globaly relevant. Born and raised in an white ethnostate.

>She is a virgin as I said
Bait, but lame. I'm a 8.5/10 and would rather be called a semi-roastie.

Always amusing how you wannabe psychologists try to analyse stuff you know nothing about with your burger-centered constructions.

>Again, you still don't get it. Your conclusion of boob preference and more human qualities like pair bonding and thus intelligence doesn't make sense because it is contingent on the fact that people who like big butts must also prefer missionary which has not been proven and can't be surmised.
Adding a hypothesis on a theory is somehow bad.

>Besides, did you actually measure all the girls you know?
It's literally the middle ground. People find avergaes to be most attractive. 0.7 is the average and the most attractive. Good lord. Such a retarded discussion because you got butthurt big time due to your fetish.

>Genetics of individual woman would determine the fluctuations in those fat cell distributions is my point.
Your first point what the correlation between wide hips and fat asses, which is made up, know you jumo to distribution which varies in each individual. Weather vane.

>And getting fat is a non sense term in a way, the correct term is "gaining" fat
A kek a day keeps the doctor away.

>>3028589
modern european culture erased the discourse on death. it is seen as something unnatural and unjust. past cultures dealt with death in a whole different ways. southern european proto magic catholicism maybe is an avant garde in that sense

>>3035349
You're not fooling anyone with your roleplaying, neckbeard

>>3027857
I still don't know what's the big deal about it considering that Europe has been a hotspot for poor excuses for execution by the clergy.

>>3027888
Is there a better reason to interfere?

>>3035713
There were no more cultural fuckery on the Inca empire compared to eurangutan chimps.

Incas were superior to europeans.

>>3035349
Post cleavage with a history book to prove you're a girl.

>>3035361
Europeans really should return to their roots.

>>3027857
Apparently it's in their genes since mexicans still chop people in to pieces all the fucking time to this day

>>3035809
Ironically that's more Northern Mexico which is whiter and not Aztec territory.

>>3032604
The only one who can look at porn in NK is kim jong un, I guess he's all about the booty

>>3033135
>>3033141
And you're absolutely certain it's meant to be interpreted literally?

>>3028589
They built massive densely populated cities before the discovery of germs, so death was basically something the average Europoor saw on a daily basis.

>>3035825
If you're Aztec It'd be both literal and metaphorical.

>>3027857
Why couldnt the spaniards draw for shit?

>>3035349
Again you know nothing of science. You can't just form a hypothesis out of your ass, you need to research and confirm a phemenon actually may exists. First step would technically be making sure that the porn hub user base study was actually representative of the country pop. Second step(most important since it is what your hypothesis out is contingent on)would be figuring out if there is a large difference between people who prefer ass to boobs also doing dog style more often.
If you actually ever had sex though(which you didn't) you would know people go into a variety of sexual positions anyway, but even so you would need to know such data before making your "hypothesis". You scientific illiterate!
It's not literally the middle ground you idiot, did you even read the sources I posted? It's the ideal.
I'm not but hurt over a "fetish. I'm angry at bad science being used to feign superiority over others when you your self are an idiot most of all. The worst kind of idiot, the one who thinks they are smart.

No my first point still stands, there are fluctuations in those patterns obviously, I was saying those patterns are more likely to go with wide hips. Not that its always but more likely. And you have not posted a single source to say otherwise.
Look no one is trying to make anyone's preferences seem inferior to anyone else's but you insecure /pol/tards. There are men who prefer women who are totally petit, and that is ok too. It doesn't mean shit about their intelligence or humanity. It's just a damn preference. Again get over yourself.

It's like arguing men with small dicks must some how be more intelligent with some ridiculous leap of logic. Thus races with small dicks must be more intelligent. When it is literally just likely how a group of people developed together (more women of that group just so happen to having tighter vaginas on average). Nothing to do with anything except how a group just happened to develop.
>>>/Pol/

File: maxresdefault.jpg (237KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

237KB, 1280x720px

>>3035913
Why couldn't medieval artists in general draw for shit? Most drawings and paintings had people looking high as fuck.

>>3035973
Minoan painting and Baroque were probably the best European art styles. Roman is nice too.

>>3027857
am mayan from belize were pretty nice

>>3035973
Because they all studied from corpses.
Corpses had those expressions all the time, in addition to looking bloated, yellow, and uncanny.

>>3028763
el chicANO

File: 17458263_1315289368565776_7875256617357257817_n.jpg (30KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 600x600px

>>3035963
>You scientific illiterate!
> You can't just form a hypothesis out of your ass
Actually I can. That the nice thing about a hypothesis, it's the proposed explanation, which would yet have to be studied. A hypothesis is the beginning of scientific knowledge. You make a hypothesis as an idea. Then you do your research (which needs a hypothesis in the first place to meet the golden standard) to form be able to form a theory with your findings.

>It's not literally the middle ground you idiot, did you even read the sources I posted? It's the ideal.
I guess you're again thinking in american terms, but for that you should also consider that North America and sadly even western europe are getting fatter and fatter, this makes the measurment of the actual wtHR quite diffult, as you will get the mixed structure of bone and fat and not the bone structure alon which is relevant to say whichh is the norm (meaning: without considering fat accumulated through personal lifestyles). Just like the AVERAGE body height represents to most attractive for each nation, I am quite certain that this will also be the case for other to be born with characteristics (but I'm lazy to waste time for an discussion on 4chins about fat women).

>It's like arguing men with small dicks
It's saying about your mentality that you get salty after posting a made uo absolutely unscientific tumblr "bodyshape" image to make your point for fatties and now try to shame men which can nothing for their genetical predisposition (unlike fatties). Even funnier when you try to shame me for muh racism, which is at least a semi-relatet topic in this discussion.

>Nothing to do with anything except how a group just happened to develop.
Nothing to see here, please keep going. It's all an (((coincidence))). :^)

Have a nice day, buttraider.

>>3028746
That doesn't take into account that many of those victims were thought to be returned to their families, who usually had small tombs under their huts/houses.
A few of those tombs had bodies of people whose bodies looked like they had been sacrificed.

File: 39305037373727392939.png (91KB, 500x446px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 500x446px

>>3036638
Lel, you tried way too hard to compensate for having a flat ass throughout your entire exchange with that anon.

File: when shes standing in a wheatfield.jpg (142KB, 767x1023px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 767x1023px

>>3028589
A seemingly never-ending series of devastating plagues.

>>3032610
pls be my gf

>>3036638
SA likes butts like your pic, prefering asses doesn't mean we prefer fat and obese asses you fucking neckbeard.

>>3028708
This is a neat map, but arguing about it is a waste of time.

If they polled me I would have said "boobs," but that doesn't me I would turn down a woman with very small boobs. I think most guys develop a taste for whatever their gf/wife's best asset is anyway.

We're supposed to be talking about why there is or isn't something wrong with the Aztecs

>>3037317
Kill yourself.

File: Curvy+girls+need+to+be+posted+more+often+here+_b3362c053ee35fe0d62d0909849e0e85.jpg (49KB, 537x858px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 537x858px

>>3036638
You're a fucking idiot. I dare you to go on /sci/ with this driven and watch them laugh at you.
You don't just pull random hypotheses out your ass though with no proposed explainations or reviews how would you figure out how you will test it without gaining some data first if the phenomenon is worth studying you idiot. Ugh I'm wasting my breath, you have never conducted research and likely have never been to college like most of your alt right friends who shun "liberal brainwashing institutions"

No you idiot try again. It is either less than or a bit more than 0.7 but not exactly 0.7 for women.I mean if you actually looked at the data, you would not see 0.7 on actual women that are measured. It's an ideal at at most a arithmetic mean.

>I'm shaming people
>Women with big butts are usually fat
Are you fucking retarded? You have to be trolling.
You know what I'm done with you. You clearly don't understand the concept of "fat in all the right places" pic related, that prevents some women from looking like fat peices of shit(and to a certain degree all women) as well actual heart disease. I literally posted a source about the latter. I'm actually done with you just stop spreading pseudo science with no evidence or actual research done to people to further your agenda mkay?

For the record I am not making fun of a group of people who on average may have small penises especially when it is easily explained that the women in said group on average may have tight vaginas. I'm not like you trying to feign superiority over a group of people due to my own insecurities and lack of actual accomplishments in life.
Just get off this fucking board already you stupid cunt. People like you are the reason why this board is going to shit and intellectually stifiled. Fuck off!
And YOU STILL HAVE YET TO POST ANY SOURCES.

>>3036638
>>3037501*You don't just pull random hypotheses out your ass though, with no proposed explainations or reviews. HOW would you figure out how you will test it without gaining some data first? More importantly, if the phenomenon is worth studying you idiot.
Damn I just jacked up that whole paragraph..stupid tablet.
I need to stay away from you. You're stupidity is rubbing off on me clearly. Get away from here! Shuu!

>>3037401
/Pol/invasion like usual. They have to take every opportunity to import modern politics and culture into /his/ because they think it is their alternative board. They are also insecure and must find every chance to assert why they think they are superior to a group of people. Meanwhile having no accomplisments of their own and stay on a taiwanese water coloring forum falling to porn and sperging out at intervals. Nothing new.
It's quite funny sometimes actually.

>>3037541
I find it amazing how far the thread got derailed. How do you go from morality of aztec practices to preference of tits or ass.

>>3037629
This is exactly why there needs to be a new rule to prevent pol leakage onto boards outside of /pol/ like /mlp/ or at least certain specialized boards committed to certain discussions like this one, /sci/, /lit/ , or /k/

File: 1486329296899.jpg (56KB, 490x746px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 490x746px

>>3037501
>You don't just pull random hypotheses out your ass though with no proposed explainations or reviews how would you figure out how you will test it without gaining some data first if the phenomenon is worth studying you idiot.
Obviously I'm not going to study this correlation. My data is this thread, my hypothesis it's conclusion. You might not like it, but calling me silly names while you obviously can't deliver serious counter points only makes you look yourself poorly educated. Pic related.

>Ugh I'm wasting my breath, you have never conducted research and likely have never been to college like most of your alt right friends who shun "liberal brainwashing institutions"
Show it to those Plebs, stupid workingclass people . How dare they disapprove of your liberal arts degree qualifying for the best starbucks on the new continent. Humility and scepticism of your own wordly perspective isn't your strenght, hue?


>It is either less than or a bit more than 0.7 but not exactly 0.7 for women.I mean if you actually looked at the data, you would not see 0.7 on actual women that are measured. It's an ideal at at most a arithmetic mean.
Are you seriously taking deep decimals to claim 0.7 isn't the average?
>nazi alt right idiot there is nearly no perfect 0.7^- wth haha gotcha

> YOU STILL HAVE YET TO POST ANY SOURCES
Ar you autistic? My popular hypothesis is based on the results of this thread. I'm not gonna waste tax payers money to prove some sperg von 4chins wrong.

Well, thank you very much for your well researched and eloquently put response.

File: 343.jpg (10KB, 200x211px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 200x211px

>>3038127
I don't have a liberal arts degree you dumb fuck. Obviously I have a science degree(cell biology and Neuroscience). What is the difference between an arithmetic mean and an actual average? Besides, you're still not listening it is an ideal and I say it for the last time. Forget it you're a fool and are contents to stay that way.
>My "popular" ""hypothesis"" is based on the results of this thread.
Kek. You can't be serious all. Just go away, anon. you're embarrassing yourself. mfw