Based on the historical analogs in Europe, East Asia, and the Near and Middle East, would a centrally administered and appointed bureaucracy along the lines of great empires like the Romans and the Chinese have been more suited to a stable and united Westeros continent than the hereditary feudal system with powerful ex-monarchy lords that the Targaryens opted for?
>>3022984
>Discuss this book guys!
>This is the history board, guy. You want the literature board.
>Okay!
>NO FUCK OFF KEEP BOOKS OUT OF /LIT/ REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>3022984
>muh genre fiction
>>3022937
How big is Westeros compared to Europe? It might be too big to rule effectively by a central administration, as the Romans found out.
>>3023499
The Iron throne only directly controls the lands around Kings-Landing, the other big families rule kind of autonomously.
>>3022984
You should have at least posted the pic
>>3022937
More than suited.
For all his "BUT WHAT IS ARAGORNS TAX POLICY???" GRRM's Seven Kingdoms' government structure is nebulous:
Like you just have
>The King.
>The Great Lords
>and their lesser vassals.
And you've no fucking idea if the "Small Council" seats are like actual bureaucracies or just a bunch of lords fobbed off to do something.