What the fuck was his problem?

greatestpierre did nothing wrong

>To punish the oppressors of humanity is clemency; to pardon them is barbarity. The rigor of tyrants has only rigor for a principle; the rigor of the republican government comes from charity.

Therefore, woe to those who would dare to turn against the people the terror which ought to be felt only by its enemies! Woe to those who, confusing the inevitable errors of civic conduct with the calculated errors of perfidy, or with conspirators' criminal attempts, leave the dangerous schemer to pursue the peaceful citizen! Perish the scoundrel who ventures to abuse the sacred name of liberty, or the redoubtable arms which liberty has entrusted to him, in order to bring mourning or death into patriots' hearts! This abuse has existed, one cannot doubt it. It has been exaggerated, no doubt, by the aristocracy. But if in all the Republic there existed only one virtuous man persecuted by the enemies of liberty, the government's duty would be to seek him out vigorously and give him a dazzling revenge. . . .

>>3019264
This.
Robespierre>any other revolulitionary leader except for Lenin

>>3019255
It's well established that collectivists who seek to impose their will on others (tankies, Nazis, etc) are some of the most insecure people out there. The only group more insecure would be computer engineers and they tend to love such things.

>>3019313
Robespierre strikes me as an impossibly insecure man but he was one of the few revolutionaries who was vehemently opposed to imposing revolutionary ideals on the rest of Europe in the beginning. Where did you learn this homosexuality?

File: zizek-would-prefer-not-to.png (119KB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 500x281px

Did nothing wrong

https://youtu.be/azKNngXBICs