Since society is an agreed upon social construct, what factors/agents of change would be necessary for a widespread social acceptance of Nazism as an prevailing alternative counter culture?
>>3017906
any movement requires charismatic preachers and leaders
>>3017906
NATIONAL SOCIALISM IS AN INHERENTLY ARISTOCRATIC IDEOLOGY, THUS, A NATIONAL SOCIALIST REGIME MUST FIRSTLY BE INSTALLED BEFORE IT CAN BE ACCEPTED BY THE MASSES, IN CONTRAST WITH NONARISTOCRATIC IDEOLOGIES WHICH ARE FIRSTLY ACCEPTED BY THE MASSES BEFORE THEY ACQUIRE POLITICAL AUTHORITY.
>>3018043
>NATIONAL SOCIALIST REGIME MUST FIRSTLY BE INSTALLED BEFORE IT CAN BE ACCEPTED BY THE MASSES
>literally got to power because of mass popular support
>literally anti-aristocratic in its core ("Kameraden die Rotfront und Reaktion erschossen")
mandatory interracial breeding for all citizens between the ages of 14 and 44 with no birth control
>>3018043
>NATIONAL SOCIALISM IS AN INHERENTLY ARISTOCRATIC IDEOLOGY, THUS, A NATIONAL SOCIALIST REGIME MUST FIRSTLY BE INSTALLED BEFORE IT CAN BE ACCEPTED BY THE MASSES
What? Nazism made its rise as a popular movement in part through sophisticated propaganda among the middle and lower classes. It was a bottom up approach.
>>3018060
>literally got to power because of mass popular support
THE MASS POPULAR SUPPORT WAS FOR THEIR POLICIES, NOT FOR THEIR IDEALS.
>literally anti-aristocratic in its core ("Kameraden die Rotfront und Reaktion erschossen")
1. NATIONAL SOCIALISM PROMOTES INDIVIDUAL, AND COLLECTIVE, EXCELLENCE, THUS, IT IS AN ARISTOCRATIC IDEOLOGY.
2. HOW DOES THAT LINE FROM "DIE FAHNE HOCH" REFUTE MY STATEMENT, ACCORDING TO YOU?
>>3018083
m8 the Nazis hated aristocrats and aristocrats hated Nazis. Real aristocrats I mean, not LARPY "aristocrats of the soul" or whatever.
Read Julius Evola's Notes on the Third Reich. He talks about the tension between the Nazi Party and the former aristocracy a lot.
>>3018083
>THE MASS POPULAR SUPPORT WAS FOR THEIR POLICIES, NOT FOR THEIR IDEALS.
The policies and the ideals are one and the same.
>NATIONAL SOCIALISM PROMOTES INDIVIDUAL, AND COLLECTIVE, EXCELLENCE, THUS, IT IS AN ARISTOCRATIC IDEOLOGY.
Excellence =/= aristocracy. Don't dwell on the original etymology, aristocrats in Europe were the apex of degeneracy and stagnation.
>HOW DOES THAT LINE FROM "DIE FAHNE HOCH" REFUTE MY STATEMENT, ACCORDING TO YOU?
National Socialism is inherently against reactionaries (aristocrats and proponents of aristocracy). You should read actual works of NatSoc people, starting with Nazi-Sozi from Goebbels, rather than esoteric pseudo-aristocratic LARPing faggotry from deluded shitskins like Miguel Serrano and Savitri Devi. Those people are cancer.
>>3018103
1. NATIONAL SOCIALISTS DESPISE DYNASTS, AND EXPLOITERS, NOT ARISTOCRATS; "ARISTOCRAT" IS TERM DENOTING PERSONAL QUALITY, NOT SOCIOPOLITICAL STATUS.
2. YOU IGNORE WHAT THE WORD "ARISTOCRACY" MEANS.
>The policies and the ideals are one and the same.
?
NO.
A POLICY IS A SOCIOPOLITICAL IMPLEMENT; AN IDEAL IS AN ETHICOMORAL, AND SPIRITUAL, END.
>Excellence =/= aristocracy. Don't dwell on the original etymology, aristocrats in Europe were the apex of degeneracy and stagnation.
QUOD VIDE MY REPLY TO THE OTHER POSTER ABOVE.
>National Socialism is inherently against reactionaries.
THE REACTIONARIES ARE AND WERE A GENERAL CATEGORY COMPRISING ETHNOTRIBALISTS, CAPITALISTIC EXPLOITERS, DYNASTS, AND PROSTATUS QUO GROUPS IN GENERAL.
>>3017906
Same thing that led to fascism last time; a strong socialist/communist movement, financial turmoil, fear of racial decline, fear of social change, political gridlock, a squeezed middle class, a militaristic cult etc.
>>3018193
>"ARISTOCRAT" IS TERM DENOTING PERSONAL QUALITY, NOT SOCIOPOLITICAL STATUS
wrong.jpg
>>3018193
>"ARISTOCRAT" IS TERM DENOTING PERSONAL QUALITY, NOT SOCIOPOLITICAL STATUS
gud post i liek, rid teh tigger
>>3018323
Why do you reply to yourself?