Christianity and Hominids

File: nignog.jpg (13KB, 299x225px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 299x225px

>>3015649
>human

>>3015649
How are they using "ape" in this context? Strictly speaking, humans are apes.

File: 91no25+qepL.jpg (611KB, 1542x2212px) Image search: [Google]

611KB, 1542x2212px

>>3017442
Prolly any non-human hominoid. I think some of them called Java Man a gibbon, and Peking Man a "monkey."

Bunp

File: 0c81c1b619da17381c5af58d13148fbe.jpg (24KB, 750x577px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 750x577px

>>3017731
>Java Man a gibbon

How rude. Java Man was a handsome individual. Look at how aesthetic his cheekbones are.

File: 5857aa1c1fec6e56299d94919b02975d.jpg (112KB, 836x543px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 836x543px

>>3019328
Thhat's what happens when you only have a skullcap to work with.

File: XyGNKq9.jpg (74KB, 524x480px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 524x480px

>>3019328
Should also note that later creationists say that they're human (either racial difference or deformity), and usually don't mention how any of their forebearers thought very differently.

Is it any worse when people support creationism for unscientific reasons than it is when they oppose GMOs or other artificial substances for unscientific reasons?

>>3021617
Just as bad, m8. Both impede change.