is he right?

>>3013049

About there being far more advanced people in the past than we think yes, when he takes it too far and says there were Roman tier civilisations around before the last ice age no.

>>3013049
no.

No. Archaeology is about being able to provide good evidence of your claims; he has none, and he knows it. It's why he refuses to debate actual academics, gets butthurt when anyone calls him on his ridiculous statements, and hides behind not actually being a scholar that's "just asking questions."

He was literally wrong about nothing the people here didnt read his works.

>>3014049
I dont have time to waste on a buffoon

>>3014416
You're not really qualified to criticize something you know literally jack shit about.

>>3013229
He actually brings up a lot of good evidence for most of his claims. He gives the sources and you can read up on the material yourself.
For example the comet impact at the younger dryas has been conclusively proven by geologists.
Did you listen to some butthurt archaeologist hiding behind outdated textbooks and trying to attack his character without ever reading a single letter of his work?

>>3014416

Classic

>>3014416
t.coon

>>3014626
Yea most /his/sokks are just buttsore