Parent-Child sexual relations in history

File: 845546846354.jpg (36KB, 576x720px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 576x720px

>>2992188

Could you give me more information on "Mr. Papua" ?

I don't think censorship is good but at this point Psychohistory has rotten too many minds.

>>2992228
What are you going on about?

I found this on wiki about the New Guineans, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Etoro_people
>The Etoro believe that young boys must ingest the semen of their elders daily from the age of 7 until they turn 17 to achieve adult male status and to properly mature and grow strong.

>>2992188
It was standard practice for the pharaoh's son to have sex with his mother in ancient Egypt.

Can someone post that study on Polynesian sexual practices? It was quite possibly the most fucked up thing i've read on here.

>>2992188
I'm skeptical. One of the few anthropological universals is incest taboo (although "incest" varies a great deal).

>>2992311
>/fit/ invades /his/
For what purpose?
Did /k/ send you here?

>>2992346
What's interesting is how varied "the" incest taboo is. Pick any two cultures at random and it's unlikely that they'll have the same idea of what the incest taboo entails. I also think it's interesting that it exists in the first place when we already have the Westermarck effect to limit consanguinity to sustainable levels. The prevalence of incest porn suggests that the presence of the taboo may even serve to incite desire where it wouldn't otherwise exist.

>>2992188
It likely happened in those sorts of arrangements:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levirate_marriage
"Her new husband might be a brother or a son (by another woman) of her first husband, so she could end up marrying her brother-in-law or stepson; the difference in age did not matter."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polyandry
"According to Julius Caesar, it was customary among the ancient Britons for brothers, and sometimes for fathers and sons, to have their wives in common."

>>2992188
It has about a 75% chance of being Ming propaganda but Manchu mothers supposedly fellated young children to calm them down.

>>2992408
> where it wouldn't otherwise exist.

Lol. why make a taboo for what that does not exist without taboo.

>X cannot reason
>thus cannot be taught anything
>X has a sex drive
>X is seeing his mother or sister
>X gets a boner
>X is trying you know what
>Y the father of X comes along
>Y is an alpha male
>Y stops X with violence
>A taboo is born.

>>2992420
This is also not uncommon throughout southern and eastern Europe. There's a woodcut that I can't seem to find that shows a woman (Saint Anne?) fondling baby Jesus's penis, in what would have at the time been understood as an affectionate manner.

>>2992459
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westermarck_effect

It's unlikely that X would have had any sexual attraction to his mother or sister in the first place. But then once you make it a taboo, it becomes something strange and exciting. Ask a bunch of guys with no female siblings if they've ever fantasized about falling in love with their sister, and you'll get plenty of responses in the affirmative. Ask the same question to men with sisters and the responses are far more likely to convey casual disinterest than agreement or even scandalized denial.

>>2992567
Read Freud. Polymorph perversion.

Also this:
>X cannot reason
>thus cannot be taught anything
>X is seeing his sister
>sister looks like any other woman
>sister looks like any other woman
>the sex drive is a blind drive
>the sex drive reacts to woman when seen with the eyes.
>again sister looks like any other woman

>>2992681
>The year of our Lord twenty seventeen
>Unironically citing Freud
>On the topic of incest, no less
This is a joke, right?

>>2992228
I just like seeing a guy trying to turn his abuse porn hobby into something very vaguely academic.

>>2993256
Have you ever read a single book of him, dude?
I want to see your empirical research on that topic. I don´t say Freud is right about everything but he was for sure more honest to himself than you are.
> Ask the same question to men with sisters and the responses are far more likely to convey casual disinterest than agreement or even scandalized denial.

Yeah, denial, what did he say about denial.
Also asking random people is your way of proving him false. Have you thought of that they lie, because it´s embarrassing? That is not a good empirical method to prove him wrong.

By the way, that a book is old doesn´t refute it.