What does his say about this man?

File: not an argument.jpg (28KB, 567x565px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 567x565px

>>2983223
He never makes any actual arguments but just repeatedly claims that religion is superstitious and nonsensical, but that doesn't necessarily make it false

Stance on veganism is pathetic.

File: neckbeard-fedora.png (377KB, 594x422px) Image search: [Google]

377KB, 594x422px

He is the leader of the atheist neckbeard cult

>>2983267

>molyjew over there

File: pope-francis-1.jpg (36KB, 620x465px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 620x465px

>>2983280

>neckbeard

Don't you have some Jamal's feet to kiss?

http://www.southcotabato.org/2017/05/mindanao-catholic-bishops-issues.html?m=1

Cucking.

>>2983223
Fuck off faggot, this is a monotheist board

>>2983328

>his church lets muds into it and he has a muddy grandchild

>>2983267
There is absolutely no evidence that supports the existence of a creator, and indeed there is a world of evidence that contradicts the claims made in religious text. Submission to unreason in favour of religion represents a leap of faith, unlike the proper consideration of an objective reality.

>>2983363
>There is absolutely no evidence that supports the existence of a creator,

merely asserting t doesnt make it so. And that is the problem with most vocal atheists, making statements like this that are too absolute. They are TOO certain, and they claim that atheism is not a belief or a religion, when its clear that most atheists believe there is no god.

>>2983373
It's not possible to prove that there is no God, however it is possible to demonstrate that the belief is unjustified (and it regularly is, for those with ears to listen).

File: bombs internally.jpg (28KB, 260x260px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 260x260px

>>2983373

True. Asserting God is a Christian god is merely asserting.

>>2983287
let me guess, you run or follow a kekistani twitter account

>>2983223
ignore is religion banters
his works on biology are actually very good

He invented memes, imagine where we would be without them.

>>2983376
> It's not possible to prove that there is no God
It is possible to do if you subscribe to at least some kind of logic, depending on logic and gods in question.

Good biologist.

>>2984730
Is he, though?
Is he really?