Why did it take so long for the first New Testament texts to

>>2976863
weak bait

>>2976863

everything in this sentence is wrong
like, read something, anything, before making a thread

>>2976863
>Why did it take so long for the first New Testament texts to appear

They were busy making up lies to cover up the truth, as the tradition is oral.

This is evidenced for the crazy train that is reading every gospel and not just the synoptic ones, read the apocryphals, read the gnostic texts and be amazed at the hallucinating travel that you will behold.

It's all filled with lies because we live surrounded by children of the devil whom sacrifice children to satan when they are bankers and very rich, you know, the things of the elite everybody forgets when they wanna tip their fedora.

>>2976863
Costantine II

7 of the letters of Paul are considered by all experts to have been written by him. He died in the first century, around 65-70
all Gospels are considered to have been written in the first century, except for John, which may have been written around the years 90-110, but it also may have been written earlier
Some church fathers were disciples of the apostles, like Polycarp, who knew the apostle John.
you can read his letter to the Philippians here
http://www.bunkertownchurch.org/docs/ce/polycarp-philippians.pdf


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apostolic_Fathers

>>2976863
The very first christian document (the Didache) has obvious references to the Mathew gospel.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Didache

Nigga do you even read?

>>2977395
>>2977433

So what happened to the other apostles?

>goy, I discovered your religion and let me tell you how it is done

>>2977501

why dont you read something?

>>2977516

I'm reading comic books here and they say nothing.