What countries are contedors to become the heir of Rome with

File: 01.jpg (62KB, 500x750px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 500x750px

>>2967558
If I see this thread ONE more time, Im gonna plotz. Saged, hidden, mic muted.

>>2967558
Romania

As a spaniard I would say Italy.

>>2967563
It's a humanities lovers place... who doesn't love roman culture?

>>2967558
america

>>2967558
Spain made an empire similar to the roman methods, except in religious terms, but Italy is closer culturally, so i would say Italy. Greece has nothing to do.

>>2967558
Syria

finland. :DDD

>>2967558
Russia is the 3rd Rome

File: translatio imperii - Anglo edition.png (392KB, 1600x2021px) Image search: [Google]

392KB, 1600x2021px

>>2967558

>>2967558
Napoleonic France was the last Roman Empire

>>2967565
>The only one that was never an empire
Why? Because of the language? It takes more than that to be the heir of Rome

>>2967558
What does a nation need to have in order to be in the running?

File: 1496014857665.png (40KB, 475x433px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 475x433px

>>2967558

>>2967558
Mount Athos

>>2967558
America

>>2967558
>Roaches need not apply.
You are feeling it but denying nonetheless.
Ottomans were the heirs of the Roman Empire, a brutal conquest based empire with relative degrees of tolerance. The only alternative would be the Imperial Russia which is ironically is not even on your list

File: liberty.jpg (649KB, 897x944px) Image search: [Google]

649KB, 897x944px

>>2967558
America, obviously.

>>2971525
>>2971539
>>2971584
kys you're selves

File: statue.jpg (535KB, 700x938px) Image search: [Google]

535KB, 700x938px

>>2971606
You do realize that kys stands for "kill your selves" right? You don't need to say kill yourselves after the kys.

>>2969525
Who said anything about being an heir?

Everyone knows that the Dacians spoke the same language as the Thracians, who moved to Italy after the Trojan War and became the Etruscans who eventually became the Romans.

Latin is a Romanian language.

File: 1496896255872.jpg (115KB, 790x837px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 790x837px

>>2967558

>>2971610
RIP in peace that guy lol

>>2971610
>>2971658
Man, he just btfo the fuck out of that guy.

File: smug.jpg (499KB, 850x890px) Image search: [Google]

499KB, 850x890px

>The colour red being associated with the Roman Empire is a meme.

>Red pigment for clothing/armour/artwork was too expensive to come by for the average soldier and even patrician.

>The Roman Legions were most likely a hodgepodge of dark, brown colours.


Wake up, fags.

>>2967558
France, and you know that I'm right

>>2972957
>France
>Germanic monarchy
>Shit tier martial tradition
>Liberal faggotry
France is literally the anti-Rome

>>2967558
The Vatican.

>>2967558
Romania.

>>2972972
>Shit tiers martial tradition
Reread what you just wrote. Slowly.

>>2972953
You're right about it being a meme, but there are several middle eastern historical sources which mention the red garb of a soldier, though they are probably talking about centurions who would have invested a lot of money into making their uniform gaudy and showy.

Also, Julius Caesar was known to have a scarlet military cloak which he wore into battle in order to be conspicuous to his men.

>>2967558
Russian Empire.
Here's how: Roman Empire->Western RE->Byzantine->Russia

>>2973330
This

>>2971612
Oh you're one of those guys

>>2972953

Red pigment wasn't expensive at all, in fact, it was the cheapest color to make.

Brazil.

>>2974781
Not all reds are the same, senpai. Ochre would be easy and cheap to make, but those rich reds we see Legionnaires sporting in movies and video games would have been a lot more rare and expensive.

>>2971610
I loled out loud

>>2971612
kek

>>2967558
Unironically, the US. The politics is similar enough with the Roman republic. Its people are similar in pride and nationalism too. You know, just before the decline.

>>2975519
>Unironically, the US.
ram your head into the nearest corner RIGHT now my senpai

>>2975519
Honestly that's stretching it. If you think about it they have very few in common.
Rome wasn't a former colony, didn't expand through religious values, and didn't have the "explorer" state of mind. You can find ways to relate them but sometimes it's just because the founding fathers intended it (architecture of monuments, senate, etc).
Just think of their caste system, too. Rome was by no means egalitarian.

File: phpwj9SBf.gif (423KB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

423KB, 320x240px

>>2967656
>>2967840
holy fugg :DD