>>2964476
parrtially they are.
celts had a footprint in almst all western europe...
then you have places where they were more present, or where they resisted and the legacy is bigger, like cornish, bretagne, galicia and portugal etc.
>>2964476
Scots are a coward race who spat on the freedom they could have had.
t. Englishman who laughs at the goatfuckers north
>>2964476
Highlanders are Lowlanders are not.
>>2965872
t. anglo-saxon'd celtic cuck
>>2964476
From what I understand Scots are a plethora of different backgrounds.
There where the Picts which are likely a Brytonic Celt, the Cumbric guys in Ayrshire which where definitely Brytonic, the Gaels which where Goidelic and where the scots name comes from, Anglo-Saxons which settled around Edinburgh, and finally the Norse living in the Isles eventually making the Norse-Gaels.
Depending on what you define as "Celtic" most of the population has some kind of Celtic roots, if you base it solely off of language then it's only the Highland Gaels.
Lowland Scots did retain a weird language and held Celtic traditions but they really progressed in a manner that followed French-English traditions hoping to keep up with the modern world.
they're something of an eddy, where disparate barbarian peoples built up like grime over the eons
>>2964476
celtic is culture, language, locality, etc..a lot of things but an actual celtic race is another thing altogether.
>>2965872
>englishman
So you're a cowardly briton that submited to the Nordic invaders and abandoned your language
It must sucks to be you
>>2967137
The English man merely evolved, in contrast, grunts and groans remained the parlance of the day in the north.