A couple of questions about the Hussite movement: Utraquists

>>2951516
I don't know about the marriage issue, but the two fractions you've named were an outcome of disputes among the original hussite movement, Tabirites being a lot more radical.

>>2951516
"Utraquists" is another name for the whole Hussite movement.

Taborites are a specific radical branch that is tied to city Tábor, which was founded specifically to be Hussite city. Which is why it became the most radically hussite city, and Taborites became a separate branch from the rest because of their radicalism.

i know they allowed priest marriage, i'm not sure about them banning marriage, but it seems bullshit, there were smaller sects who made up their own rules, but marriage is one of the crown principles of Christianity and i don't see a reason why Hussites would ban it.

May I borrow your thread for a bit op?
What was the underlying factors to the whole rebellion?
could the church have handled it any better?

>>2952602
I suppose i'm too late, but the cause was basically dissatisfaction with the general states of affairs

Things were great under Charles IV. and turned shit under Venceslaus IV. (plague came, politics turned tides, Vence didn't really care about ruling) so the rebelion was just cumlination of general dissatisfaction

Church certainly could handle it better, they didn't have to burn Hus