How historically accurate is this game /his?
>Mongoloids, negroids and caucasoids all living in the same tribe.
Yes goy, primitive tribes were just like cosmpolitan cities back then.
>>2942959
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOY VEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEY
>>2942959
There are no blacks in the game
>>2943092
Right, they just make every character so dark you can't tell what the fuck they are.
>>2942951
Well it's not bad, but it clearly ignores the writ tings of historian Munsa gaboonga, who although has been proven to not be completely accurate, it's still considered one of our best sources from the period.
In my opinion it's pretty good, even if it does show a big bias towards the more radical Ugu Iaaa who in my opinion tends to favor the Wenja and trash the Udam, you have to take it with a grain of salt like all videogames.
>>2943102
> so dark you can't tell what the fuck they are
Which is prolly what they looked like. Neandertals were the only "white" people around back then.
Also "races" as you know them didn't exist 30+k years ago, when the game is set.
>>2943117
sorry, it's set 10k years ago. Still. To answer the OP's question, it's horribly inacurate. First off there were no more neandertals (probably), and the people alive then were already mixed with them, and thus lighter-skinned. The fauna is wrong, as Smilodon fatalis lived in the Americas, not europe. Here we had various species of Homoterium (scimitar-tooth cat).
>>2942951
About on par with Wolfenstein.